i'm involved in a c parsing tool project, c99tree,
and pleased to announce its first release
http://repo.hu/projects/libporty
it is in early development, but it can parse c99 code
(without includes and preprocessor tokens) and print
an abstract syntax tree
eg useful for listing function calls
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 01:44:06PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
i'm involved in a c parsing tool project, c99tree,
and pleased to announce its first release
http://repo.hu/projects/libporty
it is in early development, but it can parse c99 code
(without includes and preprocessor tokens) and
On 2 Sep 2010, at 10:06 am, Stefan Mark wrote:
Im not sure if this is right, but most Terminals seem to make bold
text also bright. Some programs, like htop for example, rely on this.
You missed a word: some broken programs. Not only was bright for bold
was a hack for very brain-damaged
On 3 Sep 2010, at 8:49 pm, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 08:56:22PM +0200, hiro wrote:
Admittedly, the newer auto-hinters do a decent job of this these
days
The freetype autohinter?
http://freetype.sourceforge.net/autohinting/hinter.html#screenshots
Perhaps this is outdated,
On 1 Sep 2010, at 8:30 pm, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 06:00:17PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
If someone were to write a simple clean xft patch for libdraw it
could be useful, perhaps even integrated into mainline.
This may just be my limited
Don't tell me Arial is a bad font.
And about this aliasing shit: my printer doesn't show it.
Is this really a matter of taste? Or my younger eyes?
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:20:47AM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On 1 Sep 2010, at 8:30 pm, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 06:00:17PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
If someone were to write a simple clean xft patch for libdraw it
could be
There was a time where I pitied myself for growing up with dos and
windows boxes all arround.
That's changed a lot...
I sometimes still open notepad on my old xp machine just to get that
nice and warm feeling I had when I discovered the search-and-replace
function as a little kid.
It all fits
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:40:32AM +, hiro wrote:
Don't tell me Arial is a bad font.
And about this aliasing shit: my printer doesn't show it.
Is this really a matter of taste? Or my younger eyes?
Don't be a fool. Your printer doesn't show it because it has 10
times the horizontal
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Kris Maglione maglion...@gmail.com wrote:
I use Xft with wmii wihout antialiasing, because I do need UTF-8 support and
the X font system doesn't get it right for me.
This is why I prefer Xft. The X font system is horrible about UTF-8.
At least if you throw
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:50:24AM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
Last I really checked the autohinter had become very good. A few years
ago I actually recompiled freetype to disable the interpreter because the
autohinter produced so much better results for me. I suspect that was due
to my
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:02:58PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
I still don't think that the auto-hinter is nearly up to par with
designer hinted fonts. For the fonts that I have screen and print
varieties from different foundaries, the versions without hinting
information look considerably
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:28:17PM -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:02:58PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
I still don't think that the auto-hinter is nearly up to par with
designer hinted fonts. For the fonts that I have screen and print
varieties from different foundaries,
13 matches
Mail list logo
