[dev] [st] tty widthheight

2012-09-19 Thread Aurélien Aptel
Changeset 317 (14adb004eb78) introduced tw and th in the XWindow struct. They are currently equivalent to the window width and height (x.w and x.h). What are their purpose?

Re: [dev] [st] tty widthheight

2012-09-19 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Hello. On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:42:02 +0200 Aurélien Aptel aurelien.ap...@gmail.com wrote: Changeset 317 (14adb004eb78) introduced tw and th in the XWindow struct. They are currently equivalent to the window width and height (x.w and x.h). What are their purpose? The tty size is different

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote: CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web server) or as a standalone HTTP server, handing over all requests to a given CGI script. Is this just a wrapper for compatability (which seems odd, since most servers also speak CGI), or

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread hiro
prefork

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote: Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote: CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web server) or as a standalone HTTP server, handing over all requests to a given CGI script. Is this

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote: Sadly not all servers speak CGI this days, most notably nginx, and others often have broken CGI support. Oh? I guess I just never tried CGI with nginx. the called CGI script can't be 'preforked' because before you fork a CGI script you have to set the

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Robert Ransom
On 9/19/12, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote: Still, forking is never the bottleneck Never? Isn't forking-as-bottleneck most of the reason alternatives to CGI exist? The bottleneck is more likely to be exec-ing an interpreter which parses/loads a huge pile of standard

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Andreas Krennmair
* Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net [2012-09-19 17:00]: Still, forking is never the bottleneck Never? Isn't forking-as-bottleneck most of the reason alternatives to CGI exist? One of the bottlenecks of CGI is that the popular web scripting languages (i.e. PHP, Perl, Python,

Re: [dev] POLL: most beautiful suckless cloud

2012-09-19 Thread Alexander Sedov
2012/9/19 Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net: Greetings. Suckless can't stand behind the developments of the sucking world. Because of this I have a request. Please vote for your most favourite suckless cloud implementation. Both are attached. The winner will be shown in art galleries all over

Re: [dev] POLL: most beautiful suckless cloud

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Hartman
I'd like to know is this kind of jokes is considered funny here. Which kind of joke? -- sic dicit magister P Université du Québec à Montréal / Loyola University Chicago http://individual.utoronto.ca/peterjh gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B) gpg

Re: [dev] POLL: most beautiful suckless cloud

2012-09-19 Thread Martti Kühne
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Peter Hartman peterjohnhart...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to know is this kind of jokes is considered funny here. Which kind of joke? Those metajokes are indeed funny. I'm still not sure if he was relating to OP or just to himself.

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at wrote: * Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net [2012-09-19 17:00]: Still, forking is never the bottleneck Never? Isn't forking-as-bottleneck most of the reason alternatives to CGI exist? One of the bottlenecks of

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Kurt Van Dijck
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 04:43:17PM +0200, Uriel wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote: Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote: CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web server) or as a standalone HTTP server,

[dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Hi, A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions. Best regards. From 703b3cfc0cdb4998abca6815dd32699705a9f912 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:42:48 +0200 Subject: Clear X window in tsetreset()

Re: [dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread Martti Kühne
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote: Hi, A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions. Best regards. Would you also port st to wayland? cheers! mar77i

Re: [dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread pancake
How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer? On Sep 19, 2012, at 20:42, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote: Hi, A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions. Best regards. 0001-Clear-X-window-in-tsetreset.patch

Re: [dev] POLL: most beautiful suckless cloud

2012-09-19 Thread Andrew Hills
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote: Because of this I have a request. Please vote for your most favourite suckless cloud implementation. Both are attached. cl has fewer lines of code, and a shorter name, so it sucks less. I don't really care if they perform

Re: [dev] POLL: most beautiful suckless cloud

2012-09-19 Thread hiro
computas are not art.

Re: [dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Hartman
2012/9/19 pancake panc...@youterm.com: How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer? We don't want scrollback buffers. -- sic dicit magister P Université du Québec à Montréal / Loyola University Chicago http://individual.utoronto.ca/peterjh gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42

Re: [dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread Nick
Quoth Peter Hartman: 2012/9/19 pancake panc...@youterm.com: How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer? We don't want scrollback buffers. Some of us do.

Re: [dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread hiro
Just use 9term.

Re: [dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Well... I was asking about comments and suggestion of the patches. I am not the person who can accept or deny new suggestion, but I am going to give my personal opinion. Would you also port st to wayland? I think in case of being possible, st is very far to do this, because it has a lot of

[dev] [st] xft

2012-09-19 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. Attached is a port of the xft branch to the current tip of st. It will activate xft support and more fonts than just corefonts. I really tried to find corefonts that would look good and represent nearly all unicode characters – it's impossible. Please report back if it works. I will

Re: [dev] [st] Patches

2012-09-19 Thread Strake
On 19/09/2012, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote: Maybe a good solution could be integrate tmux inside of st (for example if STTMUX is defined, run tmux in starup). Yeah! Oh, we could have a variable for everything that one could wish to start in st: STTMUX, STGNUSCREEN,

[dev] st eight bit input

2012-09-19 Thread Carlos Pita
Hi, I wonder if it's possible to get something like xterm's eightBitInput=true in st. I would like to use the alt key for some vim mappings. I'm not at all savvy on terminal stuff so any hint about how to hack the code to get this working would be very much appreciated. Best regards -- Carlos

Re: [dev] [st] xft

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Hartman
What was wrong with -f commandline switch from the xft branch? Half the point is to avoid having to compile a unique binary per font. But whatever 2012/9/19 Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net: Greetings. Attached is a port of the xft branch to the current tip of st. It will activate xft