Re: Consistency SystemML configuration properties

2017-09-16 Thread Arvind Surve
/2017 04:34:46 PM---Currently, our SystemML > configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, som > >> > >> From: Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> > >> To: dev@systemml.apache.org > >> Date: 09/16/2017 04:34 PM > >

Re: Consistency SystemML configuration properties

2017-09-16 Thread Nakul Jindal
> +1 for 'sysml'. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Glenn > >> > >> Matthias Boehm ---09/16/2017 04:34:46 PM---Currently, our SystemML > configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, som > >> > >> From: Matthias Boehm <m

Re: Consistency SystemML configuration properties

2017-09-16 Thread Niketan Pansare
> configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, som > > From: Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> > To: dev@systemml.apache.org > Date: 09/16/2017 04:34 PM > Subject: Consistency SystemML configuration properties > > > > > Curren

Re: Consistency SystemML configuration properties

2017-09-16 Thread Glenn Weidner
+1 for 'sysml'. Thanks, Glenn From: Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> To: dev@systemml.apache.org Date: 09/16/2017 04:34 PM Subject: Consistency SystemML configuration properties Currently, our SystemML configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix

Consistency SystemML configuration properties

2017-09-16 Thread Matthias Boehm
Currently, our SystemML configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, some properties use the prefix 'dml' (e.g., dml.yarn.appmaster), others 'systemml' (e.g., systemml.stats.finegrained), and yet others no prefix at all (e.g., localtmpdir). We discussed this before but