Thanks for bringing this up Mike - this is a useful discussion. Let us
first clarify the R semantics. In R, any scalar/vector matrix indexing
gives a numeric vector because there are no scalars but vectors of length
1. So Nakul, R does not behave like this proposal. If I remember correctly,
Matlab
+1
Numpy also behaves the way Mike is suggesting here.
imran
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Nakul Jindal wrote:
> +1 to Mike & Deron.
>
> Two other languages/packages that behave like this:
> R : http://www.r-tutor.com/r-introduction/matrix
> Octave :
> https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/do
+1 to Mike & Deron.
Two other languages/packages that behave like this:
R : http://www.r-tutor.com/r-introduction/matrix
Octave :
https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Index-Expressions.html
-Nakul
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Thank you Mike for br
Thank you Mike for bringing this up. To me, this definitely makes sense at
the user (DML) level.
For a Java-style pseudocode example, currently we require the user to do
the following:
int[][] m = int[][]{1,2,3,4};
int[][] n = m[0][0];
int x = (int) n;
I feel the following would be more 'na
