Re: Workflow for assigning issues to users

2016-01-20 Thread Matthias Boehm
well, I would prefer to use common sense here instead of a fixed workflow. There are many different scenarios of external contributions w/ or w/o JIRA - one size does not fit all. In general, we should create an atmosphere were we encourage people to contribute. However, if a new user likes to

Re: Workflow for assigning issues to users

2016-01-20 Thread Deron Eriksson
Sounds good. We can follow that workflow and modify it as we need to. I added Nakul as a contributor and assigned the JIRA to him. Deron On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Mike Dusenberry wrote: > I vote yes, let's use Deron's suggestion. It's simple, and assigning a

Release source package

2016-01-20 Thread Deron Eriksson
I have a question (mostly for Luciano). I'm examining the release candidate files to try to verify that our candidate files are compliant with the Apache release management policy ( http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html). I see under the Release Check List (

SystemML Hadoop version support

2016-01-20 Thread Deron Eriksson
Does SystemML still support Hadoop 1? I see in MRConfigurationNames a static initialization block for Hadoop v1/v2 properties. I'd like to remove the current deprecated property warnings (log messages in the console) that we get with Hadoop v2.4.1 and I was wondering if I should add the old v1

Re: Release source package

2016-01-20 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > I have a question (mostly for Luciano). > > I'm examining the release candidate files to try to verify that our > candidate files are compliant with the Apache release management policy ( >

Re: SystemML Hadoop version support

2016-01-20 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > Does SystemML still support Hadoop 1? > > I see in MRConfigurationNames a static initialization block for Hadoop > v1/v2 properties. I'd like to remove the current deprecated property > warnings (log messages in

Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.9-incubating (RC1)

2016-01-20 Thread Luciano Resende
This vote is canceled. Please create tasks under the umbrela jira for us to track the issues being raised. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-463 On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Mike Dusenberry wrote: > Upon further review, I've found multiple issues

Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.9-incubating (RC1)

2016-01-20 Thread Mike Dusenberry
Upon further review, I've found multiple issues with the "standalone" package that should block this release candidate. 1.  The "readme.txt" in the "standalone" distribution refers to a "jSystemML.jar" file that will be generated for the user to allow the use of "java -jar jSystemML.jar".  

Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.9-incubating (RC1)

2016-01-20 Thread Shirish Tatikonda
+1 On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version > 0.9.0! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, January > 23 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1

Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.9-incubating (RC1)

2016-01-20 Thread dusenberrymw
+1 -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Jan 20, 2016, at 3:39 AM, Frederick R Reiss wrote: > > > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > >>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Shirish Tatikonda >>