Couple of questions on website contents

I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master branch : Initial page: - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page, but it looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted

Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 November 2016, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.11.0-incubating ! The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

+1 On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Acs S wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version > 0.11.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.11.0-incubating ! The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package

Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

Indeed, some of these operations do allocate additional data structures. Other problems were (1) that our memory estimates do not account for the explicit copy into commons math data structures (e.g., Array2DRowRealMatrix), and (2) unnecessarily raised exceptions due to unknowns. However, both

Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

if I remember correctly then it is not trivial to accurately estimate the memory foot print for these commons math functions at compile time depending on what intermediates they produce ... Meaning you may still end up with java heap space OOM at runtime. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden

Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

well, we still compute memory estimates for these operations. So I guess, a good compromise would be to raise a warning whenever the memory estimate is known to exceed the local memory budget. Regards, Matthias On 10/24/2016 8:29 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: Would it be acceptable for a user to

Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

Would it be acceptable for a user to receive a log warning if the user uses an operation that is currently only implemented for single node? My concern is that there is an expectation for operations to be distributed with SystemML, and if an operation is not currently distributed, the user needs

Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

Hi, There is an initial implementation and PR. https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/273 -Nakul > On Oct 24, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Berthold Reinwald wrote: > > Thanks, Imran. I think it is a good idea to start off with the DML-bodied > function implementation.

Re: Local versions of Linear Algebra Operators in DML

Thanks, Imran. I think it is a good idea to start off with the DML-bodied function implementation. This will hold until we can have a built in implementation. We prototyped an implementation of distributed Cholesky as a DML bodied function as well. For performance optimization, as the matrix

Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas

+1 on #4. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden Research Center office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com From: Luciano Resende To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/21/2016 04:37 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo