?person=us-npansar
From: Frederick R Reiss/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 09/30/2016 04:33 PM
Subject:Re: Enhancing SystemML JavaDocs
Wow, I was not aware that those empty JavaDocs were put in -- and left in
-- on purpose! To me
: 09/30/2016 03:18 PM
Subject: Re: Enhancing SystemML JavaDocs
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I do not see how these automatically generated javadocs are useful. For
> instance:
>
> /**
> *
> * @param pb
> *
g
> Date: 09/30/2016 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Enhancing SystemML JavaDocs
> --
>
>
>
> Hi Luciano,
>
> I am definitely in favor of fixing these javadocs. I created
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-842 two months ago to
> add
: 09/30/2016 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Enhancing SystemML JavaDocs
Hi Luciano,
I am definitely in favor of fixing these javadocs. I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-842 two months ago to
address this issue.
However, there are so many problems with the javadocs that I
Hi Luciano,
I am definitely in favor of fixing these javadocs. I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-842 two months ago to
address this issue.
However, there are so many problems with the javadocs that I think
addressing this should probably be broken down into separate java
Currently we have a bunch of wrong, incomplete or obsolete javadocs on our
APIs, and this continue o grow because we have the following configuration
in our build:
ignore-doclint-warnings-for-javadocs-on-java-8
[1.8,)
