+1 for 1 and 4,
1 is great for a flat logo icon, for the top of the website, headers, etc.
that can be scaled very small (and large)
and
4 is perfect for the interactions throughout the website, and other
animations, branding pieces, etc.
We can definitely have a range of uses for iconography that can utilize
more than one design!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nakul Jindal wrote:
> +1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist
>
> Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of SystemML
> being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng worked
> on.
>
> -Nakul
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for SystemML action figures as well :D
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
> > > favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
> > > Jeremy.
> > >
> > > These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> > > jer...@objectadjective.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 Mike.
> > >>
> > >> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons.
> Action
> > >> figures would be really cool!
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy Anderson
> > >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > >>
> > >> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main
> logo,
> > >> and
> > >> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the
> designs
> > >> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks!!
> > >> >
> > >> > -Mike
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > Mike Dusenberry
> > >> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > >> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >> >
> > >> > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I vote for #4.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Niketan Pansare
> > >> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > >> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > >> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=
> > >> us-npansar
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
> > >> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> > >> > >
> > >> > > From: Deron Eriksson
> > >> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Deron
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <
> > >> jason.aza...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I vote for #1
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > >> > mboe...@googlemail.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I
> wasn't
> > >> > expecting
> > >> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > > > Matthias
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
> > >> > features of
> > >> > > > 3
> > >> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here
> > >> since
> > >> > I
> > >> > > > have
> > >> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations
> > >> involved
> > >> > such
> > >> > > > as
> > >> > > > >> scalability.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of
> the
> > >> ASF (
> > >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
> > >> > although I
> > >> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Deron
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > >> > > > mboe...@googlemail.com>
> > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer
> to
> > >> > remove
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with
> no
> > >> > > > intentions
> > >> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it
> too
> > >> but
> > >> > it's
> > >> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
> > >> > discussions to
> > >> > > > >>> add
> > >> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > >> > > > >>>