-1.
We didn't even have a discussion about this, let alone a vote. I'm open for
whatever documentation
tool we find does the job best but the sources for the official documentation
will not be hosted
somewhere where it's not under the control of the PMC and we won't use a
technology that not
Please also fix the build ;)
Uli
On 02.11.2012 03:28, kao...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 015816ed4 - b108e06f4
FIXED - TAP5-2022: Add PropertyAccess.getAnnotation
- implement convenience for
PropertyAccess.getAdapter().getPropertyAdapter().getAnnotation()
And I will be happy to explain what the tools do and how to use them and even
drive the effort.
Uli
On 02.11.2012 09:19, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
-1.
We didn't even have a discussion about this, let alone a vote. I'm open for
whatever documentation
tool we find does the job best but the
Tapestry supports localization for templates, messages and assets. It will
firstly attempt to locate a resource for Romanian before falling back to the
default unlocalized resource.
http://tapestry.apache.org/assets.html
http://tapestry.apache.org/localization.html
If you'd like explicit control
-1 from me too. We have far too much invested in Confluence at this
point to move off of it when we don't have to. Besides, Jekyll looks
like a big step backward in functionality from Confluence.
A quick reminder of just a fraction of the Confluence features we're
currently using:
1) inclusion
In your pages / components
@Inject
private Locale locale;
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Retrieveing-specific-desc-from-the-base-tp5717585p5717589.html
Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Bob Harner bobhar...@gmail.com wrote:
-1 from me too. We have far too much invested in Confluence at this
point to move off of it when we don't have to. Besides, Jekyll looks
like a big step backward in functionality from Confluence.
A quick reminder of just a
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote:
-1.
We didn't even have a discussion about this, let alone a vote. I'm open for
whatever documentation
tool we find does the job best but the sources for the official documentation
will not be hosted
somewhere where
Lets say I have desc for the article in English and Romanian, and that based
on what language user has selected, I want to retrieve specific desc from
the base. I thought about making method that will return boolean whether or
not is specific persistenlocale used. And I should apply in t:if
It would it be better to create it under a github organization e.g. Tapestry5
or ApacheTapestry rather than a personal account.
Denis
Nov 2, 2012 v 2:56 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote:
-1.
We didn't even have a
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote:
Please also fix the build ;)
Uli
I couldn't access builds.apache.org (502 or the requests never complete). I
added one test and all ioc tests pass on my machine. I'm not quite sure how
the addition would break the build or
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Bob Harner bobhar...@gmail.com wrote:
-1 from me too. We have far too much invested in Confluence at this
point to move off of it when we don't have to. Besides, Jekyll looks
like a big
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:17:20 -0200, o3005659 o3005...@rtrtr.com wrote:
Lets say I have desc for the article in English and Romanian, and that
based
on what language user has selected, I want to retrieve specific desc from
the base. I thought about making method that will return boolean
I'd like to help with this effort and I submitted a CLA.
I don't really care how it's hosted but I do have one comment. Before
Tapestry I used ACS and it had some of the best documentation I've seen. I
think there were two reasons for this.
1. It was considered a priority
2. The documentation
On 02.11.2012 14:56, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote:
-1.
We didn't even have a discussion about this, let alone a vote. I'm open for
whatever documentation
tool we find does the job best but the sources for the official
15 matches
Mail list logo