Yes, this is a clear -1, so I'm cancelling this RC.
I think these snuck past the apache-rat check as they contains BOTH
ASF and LGPL headers.
Thanks for checking, Alan!
On 2 June 2016 at 17:29, Alan Williams wrote:
> On 02-Jun-16 17:01, Gale Naylor wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am finding Univers
On 1 June 2016 at 12:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Engine 3.1.0-incubating
> Apache Taverna Common Activities 2.1.0-incubating
> Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating
Thanks to everyone reviewin
On 1 June 2016 at 12:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> SHA-1 checksums:
>
> cb0176c33391d1c2d17eae973e0d665cc90bbc94
> apache-taverna-commandline-3.1.0-incubating-source-release.zip
> 1c0446734950c7360aa0d1c95952d0acb148a783
> apache-taverna-common-activities-2.1.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
There is no #3. I just forgot to adjust the numbers.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:56 AM Gale Naylor
wrote:
> I finished reviewing all the file headers. Here is what I found:
>
> ---
> Non-ASF Copyrights
> ---
>
> 1) University of Manchester copyright in taverna-prove
I finished reviewing all the file headers. Here is what I found:
---
Non-ASF Copyrights
---
1) University of Manchester copyright in taverna-provenanceconnector
files (see previous email).
2) taverna-execution-hadoop Crossproduct.java file contains copyright
by Ad
On 02-Jun-16 17:01, Gale Naylor wrote:
Hello,
I am finding University of Manchester copyright notices on many of the
files in taverna-provenanceconnector. This is not allowed, right? (
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers)
For example:
src/main/java/org/apache/taverna/provenance
Hello,
I am finding University of Manchester copyright notices on many of the
files in taverna-provenanceconnector. This is not allowed, right? (
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers)
For example:
src/main/java/org/apache/taverna/provenance/api/ProvenanceAccess.java
and all the j
Starting the review process...
--
UP-FRONT CHECKS
--
The MD5 checksums in the [VOTE] email are the same as the SHA1 checksums.
I'm using the downloaded MD5 and SHA-1.
(Question) I'm curious what r13865 means:
https:
On 1 June 2016 at 12:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Engine 3.1.0-incubating
> Apache Taverna Common Activities 2.1.0-incubating
> Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating
> ..
> Build the release can
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Taverna Engine 3.1.0-incubating
Apache Taverna Common Activities 2.1.0-incubating
Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating
This is the second release candidate, fixing TAVERNA-975 and TAVERNA-973.
If you tested R
10 matches
Mail list logo