[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15326151#comment-15326151
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3850:
Github user nsuke commented on the issue:
Github user nsuke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1024
A job is failing due to `make[2]: write error` and it seems to be
reproducible.
The same commit 4b7dbe3 as the current master worked for my travis account
at the time of PR, though:
I've disabled both jenkins jobs for now and have pushed pr 1024 [1] to get
the baseline of where travis is at against the current trunk. anyone
wanting to follow progress please watch THRIFT-3850 [2], ping or irc if
interested in helping
-Jake
[1]: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1024
[2]:
GitHub user jfarrell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1024
THRIFT-3850: All apache builds are failing when initiated from a github
THRIFT-3850: All apache builds are failing when initiated from a github
pull request to Jenkins
Disabled jenkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15326124#comment-15326124
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3850:
GitHub user jfarrell opened a pull request:
No, I'm perfectly fine with Github and I'm not bound in any way to JIRA
patches. I believe I made my point already. I just wanted to mention that
should not repeat that discussion. From my feeling we should decide and act
now. If that means that Jenkins and JIRA patches have to go, then fine.
Jens, if the proposal is technically still pending, shall we resume it here
or on the existing thread ?
If I remember correctly, we were to choose between these two options.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 12:45 AM Jens Geyer wrote:
>
> The interesting thing is that I made this
The interesting thing is that I made this exact proposal just a few weeks
ago, with exactly the same arguments. It was answered that we (can?) have
JIRA patch pre-commit builds as well.
$0,02
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
From: Aki Sukegawa
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 5:26 PM
To:
Currently JIRA patches need manual verification that can to be error prone
and/or tedious.
It would make much sense to either enable the JIRA-patch-Jenkins
integration or stop accepting JIRA patches.
The latter seems reasonable to me, for the sake of simplicity and focus.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at