Let me actually take a look before answering. Sorry!
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tim Allison wrote:
> Thank you for reading the reports!!!
>
> The files are very likely broken. I can take a look. The change was
> probably because of an "upgrade" to junrar. Should I revert to the
>
Thank you for reading the reports!!!
The files are very likely broken. I can take a look. The change was
probably because of an "upgrade" to junrar. Should I revert to the
version we used in 1.19.1?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:34 PM Luís Filipe Nassif wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Reading your great
Hi Tim,
Reading your great reports, I also saw some new exceptions with RAR files
in likely broken folder, but seems tika was able to extract some text from
them before. Do you know if those files are really broken and why tika
extracted text from them before?
Thank you,
Luis
Em qui, 13 de dez
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16720463#comment-16720463
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-2792:
--
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika-trunk #1608 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16720430#comment-16720430
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-2792:
--
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build tika-branch-1x #141 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16720381#comment-16720381
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-2792:
--
UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build tika-2.x-windows #362 (See
Roll forward! Yay!
From: Tim Allison
Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 7:02 AM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Subject: Re: 1.20?
Reports are here:
http://162.242.228.174/reports/tika_1_20-pre-rc1.zip
I'm going to revert the mp4 parser, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison reopened TIKA-2792:
---
There were surprises. Let's revert for now and work with [~sannies] on
improvements to the fresher code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison updated TIKA-2792:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.20)
(was: 2.0.0)
> Upgrade mp4parser dependency
>
When I update our keys file, should I leave in my revoked key and
append my new key, or should I overwrite my old key with my new key?
I'm guessing the latter, but wanted to check.
Thank you!
Cheers,
Tim
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:23 AM Nick Burch wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec
Reports are here:
http://162.242.228.174/reports/tika_1_20-pre-rc1.zip
I'm going to revert the mp4 parser, and commit the few dependency
upgrades I ran.
The _major_ difference in content for ppt is explained by the
duplication of header/footer info. To confirm this, note that the
values for
11 matches
Mail list logo