Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

Hi, However, in general we just need an “object mapper pattern.” For instance: For any JSON object { } that has a @type field, the @type value maps to a deserializer. Thus, while we need to be able to serialize/deserialize the standard Vertex/Edge/VertexProperty/etc. the representation should

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1379) unaccounted excess in TailGlobalStep

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Plurad updated TINKERPOP-1379: Description:

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1379) unaccounted excess in TailGlobalStep

Jason Plurad created TINKERPOP-1379: --- Summary: unaccounted excess in TailGlobalStep Key: TINKERPOP-1379 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1379 Project: TinkerPop Issue

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

$ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.1 Validating binary distributions * downloading Apache Gremlin Console (apache-gremlin-console-3.2.1-bin.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache Gremlin

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

ah - sorry - didn't follow that. that makes sense to me. inVLabel and outVLabel are kinda awkward. +1 from me on that one. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Robert Dale wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Mallette > wrote: > >> > >> > -

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: >> >> > - VertexProperty and (edge) Property are implicit types. I don't know >> > if this is ok. Could they ever be used outside of their parents where >> > they would need to be typed? >> >> I agree with the

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

Ran all the driver tests again neo4j and tinkerpop and everything works as expected. VOTE: +1 On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Hello, > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.1 is ready for release - note > the lack of "-incubating"

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

> > > - VertexProperty and (edge) Property are implicit types. I don't know > > if this is ok. Could they ever be used outside of their parents where > > they would need to be typed? > > I agree with the VertexProperty remark. That's one last question I wanted > to solve, if we go for typing

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1378) Provide a config for Optout

pieter martin created TINKERPOP-1378: Summary: Provide a config for Optout Key: TINKERPOP-1378 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1378 Project: TinkerPop Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

There's also Path that can be returned from a query. It looks like GraphSON 1.0 handles this today in the REST API but it's not typed as a path. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:14 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On 2016-07-19 18:02 (+0100), Robert Dale

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-19 18:02 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote: > - It seems redundant to nest a vertex or edge inside a type-value > object and is inconsistent with a VertexProperty. > - VertexProperty and (edge) Property are implicit types. I don't know > if this is ok. Could they ever be

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-19 17:47 (+0100), Stephen Mallette wrote: > it should - properties are a Map of Lists of Property values. > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Dylan Millikin > wrote: > > > Quick question which is probably handled automatically but

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

- It seems redundant to nest a vertex or edge inside a type-value object and is inconsistent with a VertexProperty. - VertexProperty and (edge) Property are implicit types. I don't know if this is ok. Could they ever be used outside of their parents where they would need to be typed? - Edges: -

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

it should - properties are a Map of Lists of Property values. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Dylan Millikin wrote: > Quick question which is probably handled automatically but is this working > with multiple cardinalities on properties? > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

Quick question which is probably handled automatically but is this working with multiple cardinalities on properties? On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com < gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"< >

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com" wrote: > > > On 2016-07-09 16:48 (+0100), Stephen Mallette wrote: > > With all the work on GLVs and the recent work on GraphSON 2.0, I think it's > > important that we have a solid,

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x code line

That's typically how we do things here at TinkerPop - we tend to allow "features that don't break public API" into the "z" of "x.y.z", however, we're trying to wind down development on the 3.1.x line of code and not introduce too much more there. I'd be open to a new bits of documentation on that

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x code line

Stephen, I noticed a couple of issues moved out of 3.1.4 for reason of bug fixes only. Typically the semantic versioning is limited to "public API". So I would argue that adding a service script (optional usage at that) and a tutorial (documentation) would not affect the public API or even general

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-980) Add a service script or daemon mode in the distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-980: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.4) Release 3.1.4 is for bugs only at this point as

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1342) Allow setting scriptEvaluationTimeout in driver

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1342: Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.4) 3.2.2 Release 3.1.4 is for

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1007) Gremlin at the Movies Tutorial (SQL-Style in Gremlin)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1007: Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.4) Release 3.1.4 is for bugs only at this point as

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.3/3.2.1

I've set up version 3.1.4 and 3.2.2 in JIRA and migrated all old issues in those lines to them. As per previous discussion about the 3.1.x line, I'll be moving out all issues that aren't bug or release related which should just leave: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1376 Also, I

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

Hello, We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.1 is ready for release - note the lack of "-incubating" everywhere. :) The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.1/ The source distribution is provided by:

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1358) spark-gremlin tests require special setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1358: Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2.1) > spark-gremlin tests require special setup >

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1358) spark-gremlin tests require special setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1358. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > spark-gremlin tests require special setup >

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1358) spark-gremlin tests require special setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1358. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > spark-gremlin tests require special setup >

[jira] [Reopened] (TINKERPOP-1358) spark-gremlin tests require special setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reopened TINKERPOP-1358: - > spark-gremlin tests require special setup >

[jira] [Reopened] (TINKERPOP-1358) spark-gremlin tests require special setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reopened TINKERPOP-1358: - > spark-gremlin tests require special setup >

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1358) spark-gremlin tests require special setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1358: Labels: (was: spark) > spark-gremlin tests require special setup >