Github user joshsh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/375
Sure. Here: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/376
Note that the distros for giraph-gremlin, spark-gremlin, and hadoop-gremlin
don't use the apache-tinkerpop- prefix. I haven't
Github user joshsh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/375
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user joshsh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/376
Finished renaming distribution from 'apache-' to 'apache-tinkerpop-'
Fixed gremlin.sh and assembly descriptor, updated documentation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/375
hey @joshsh - wowtotally missed all those. this would have all bit me
on release day so thanks for that.
can i ask that you please retarget your pull request for the tp31 branch?
GitHub user joshsh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/375
Finished renaming distribution from 'apache-' to 'apache-tinkerpop-'
Fixed gremlin.sh and assembly descriptor, updated documentation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1396.
---
Resolution: Done
completed on https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/371
>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/371
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15410090#comment-15410090
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1350:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/367
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
## Description:
Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases
(OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP).
## Activity:
As discussed in the previous report, TinkerPop was preparing for the first
releases outside of incubation. Those releases were voted on positively by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409951#comment-15409951
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1400:
---
Github user analytically commented on a diff in
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/372
Ah. Gotcha. Yea, please feel free to update my branch source with respect
test that does the break and I can work to fix it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Hello,
This is cool. Check out also ImmutablePath.extend(labels) as that is ultimately
what Traverser.addLabels() calls. We have a lot of set copying and I don’t know
if its needed (as you seem to be demonstrating). What I don’t like about your
solution is the explicit reference to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409927#comment-15409927
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1400:
---
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
Sorry forgot to add a rather important part.
I changed ImmutablePath's constructor to
private ImmutablePath(final ImmutablePathImpl previousPath, final
Object currentObject, final Set currentLabels) {
this.previousPath = previousPath;
this.currentObject = currentObject;
Hi,
I have been optimizing Sqlg of late and eventually arrived at TinkerPop
code.
The gremlin in particular that I am interested is path queries.
Here is the test that I am running in jmh.
//@Setup
Vertex a = graph.addVertex(T.label, "A", "name", "a1");
for (int i = 1;
Github user dalaro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/372
Thanks for the replies.
@spmallette I will investigate whether this behavior also exists on 3.1 and
retarget if so. I think this will involve making a standalone test instead of
just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1400:
-
Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
> SubgraphStrategy introduces infinite
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1400:
-
Summary: SubgraphStrategy introduces infinite recursion if filter
has Vertex/Edge steps.
Key: TINKERPOP-1400
URL:
19 matches
Mail list logo
