[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-786) Patterns for DSL Development

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16023985#comment-16023985 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-786: -- Github user n-tran commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #610: TINKERPOP-786 Gremlin DSL Support

Github user n-tran commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/610 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #606: Corrected copy-paste error in until step for predicate...

Github user mpollmeier commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/606 In theory, yes. But it seems to behave fine as it is. Here's a scenario for the gremlin-groovy shell: ``` g = TinkerGraph.open() v0 = g.addVertex("x", 1) v1 =

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1675) RemoteStep#processNextStart() throws CompletionException instead of underlying exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16023638#comment-16023638 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1675: --- Github user okram commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #609: TINKERPOP-1675 Throw underlying unchecked exception in...

Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/609 VOTE +1. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala 2.11 and Spark 2.0 support

RERO +1 Robert Dale On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > well - i guess i'm realizing that i was thinking a lot of big things for > 3.3.0 but it's almost 6 months into the year and i don't think everything i > wanted to see is going to get done. then

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala 2.11 and Spark 2.0 support

well - i guess i'm realizing that i was thinking a lot of big things for 3.3.0 but it's almost 6 months into the year and i don't think everything i wanted to see is going to get done. then you add in the Spark 2.0 stuff you already mentioned which is more reason to release. smaybe it's

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala 2.11 and Spark 2.0 support

Interesting you brought this up. I was going to start a discussion on it actually next week when I started another discussion about 3.2.5/3.1.7 release. I think we should just talk about how to release 3.3.0. Let's just figure out what things need to absolutely go in 3.3.0 and then aim for a

[DISCUSS] Scala 2.11 and Spark 2.0 support

This question on TinkerPop 3.3 on the Gremlin users list ultimately comes back to Scala 2.11 support . I can understand that some features slated for

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1676) Improve GraphSON Performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16023305#comment-16023305 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1676: - Just pushed the change that removes

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1676) Improve GraphSON Performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1676: Labels: breaking (was: ) > Improve GraphSON Performance >

[DISCUSS] GraphSON serialization of Path

In doing some performance enhancements to GraphSON I noticed a 'bug" in GraphSON's serialization of Path. It is inconsistent with Gryo in that it includes properties if elements are present. That's a massively expensive operation and will obviously make GraphSON always lag behind Gryo in terms of

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16023063#comment-16023063 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- Github user robertdale commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #612: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/612 `docker/build.sh -i -t -n` success on tp31 VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022895#comment-16022895 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- Github user robertdale commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #612: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/612 `docker/build.sh -i -t -n` success on master. Waiting for tp31 to finish. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #612: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user oscerd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/612 This seems to be fine. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022743#comment-16022743 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- Github user oscerd closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022740#comment-16022740 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- GitHub user oscerd opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022742#comment-16022742 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- Github user oscerd commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #611: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user oscerd closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/611 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #611: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user oscerd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/611 I'm closing this now. New PR here: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/612 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #612: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

GitHub user oscerd opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/612 TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/oscerd/tinkerpop TINKERPOP-1677-tp31 Alternatively you

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #611: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user oscerd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/611 I already run a full build locally --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022733#comment-16022733 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- Github user oscerd commented on the issue:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1675) RemoteStep#processNextStart() throws CompletionException instead of underlying exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022732#comment-16022732 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1675: --- Github user robertdale commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #609: TINKERPOP-1675 Throw underlying unchecked exception in...

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/609 VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022726#comment-16022726 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- Github user robertdale commented on the issue:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022723#comment-16022723 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #611: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/611 @spmallette I have this pull request building now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #611: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/611 Also - have you run a full build with integration tests to success? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #611: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/611 @oscerd can you retarget your pull request to tp31 and add an entry in the CHANGELOG? Changelogs: - [2.4.10](http://groovy-lang.org/changelogs/changelog-2.4.10.html) -

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022461#comment-16022461 ] Andrea Cosentino commented on TINKERPOP-1677: - PR opened:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16022459#comment-16022459 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1677: --- GitHub user oscerd opened a pull request:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #611: TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

GitHub user oscerd opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/611 TINKERPOP-1677 Bump Groovy to 2.4.11 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/oscerd/tinkerpop TINKERPOP-1677 Alternatively you can

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1677) Bump Groovy to 2.4.11

Andrea Cosentino created TINKERPOP-1677: --- Summary: Bump Groovy to 2.4.11 Key: TINKERPOP-1677 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1677 Project: TinkerPop Issue Type: