GitHub user mpollmeier opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715
change behaviour of repeat step to be depth first search (DFS)
OLTP traversals are normally DFS unless there is you use a barrier
step. This wasn't the case for `repeat` though, and this
that's what i meant by "reflection" or as you suggest eval(). I guess the
point is that if the language can support some way of taking the string
value and turning it automatically into a traversal in that GLVs style then
we should do that.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Kuppitz
For unparameterized queries it can probably be as easy as:
@given("the traversal of")
def translate_traversal(step):
g = step.context.g
step.context.traversal = eval(step.text)
Cheers,
Daniel
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote:
> That's great
That's great stuff. I haven't used Cucumber / Gherkin for years, but I
really like the BDD approach.
and then you can look at the GLV Gremlin translations specifically here:
> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/TINKERPOP-1784/
>
I've brought this issue up in the past and had suggested some options I had
in mind but now I've finally put the basics of those ideas in place so I
figured I'd start a fresh thread. Recall that the issue at hand is that we
don't have a test suite for GLVs as gremlin-test is bound to the JVM. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1783:
Component/s: process
> PageRank gives incorrect results for graphs with sinks
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1777:
Component/s: process
> Gremlin .max step returns -2147483648 for empty result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1777:
Affects Version/s: 3.2.6
> Gremlin .max step returns -2147483648 for empty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166826#comment-16166826
]
Cédric L. Charlier commented on TINKERPOP-1772:
---
I tried to replicate on a third
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166523#comment-16166523
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1782:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on a diff in the
Github user dkuppitz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/714#discussion_r138940544
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/strategy/optimization/RangeByIsCountStrategyTest.java
---
@@ -99,6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166503#comment-16166503
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1766:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/704
I just cherry-picked the two commits from @jorgebay's PR and merged tp32
into master afterwards. So master should be in a good state now.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Florian Hockmann closed TINKERPOP-1766.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Gremlin.Net: Closed connections should not be re-used
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Florian Hockmann updated TINKERPOP-1766:
Fix Version/s: 3.3.1
3.2.7
> Gremlin.Net: Closed connections
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166463#comment-16166463
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1766:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/704
yeah - i remember that now! i wonder how i messed that up.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166439#comment-16166439
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1766:
---
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/704
It's weird because 6a3fc39a912bec98707dd69d461955330627df10 was merged by
@spmallette on master in 75502eef222b0dfc7aa83c2456ab319a9f9dd1a6 (he beat me
to it because I was taking too long to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166400#comment-16166400
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1766:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/704
what the heck?! I wonder what got messed up there. i don't see a merge
from jorge from tp32 to master after that, so i guess it never got in there,
yet how could it have been ignored? we
Artem Aliev created TINKERPOP-1783:
--
Summary: PageRank gives incorrect results for graphs with sinks
Key: TINKERPOP-1783
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1783
Project: TinkerPop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166366#comment-16166366
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1766:
---
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/704
Thanks for the explanation @spmallette. I was about to ask about the
approach for merging pull requests as the documentation only talks about the
case where separate pull requests are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166122#comment-16166122
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1766:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/704
@FlorianHockmann When you merge a PR to tp32, please make sure you also
merge tp32 to master. Technically it is best to do that locally first, make
sure both tp32 and master are building
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166052#comment-16166052
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1766:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/704
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16165813#comment-16165813
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1761:
---
Github user ko-mueller commented on the issue:
Github user ko-mueller commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/709
Alright, it just would be nice to have this fixed in the next release. I
didn't upgrade from 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 because of this. It's not a big issue for me
right now, just that I'd like to stay
30 matches
Mail list logo