[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #887: fix(DriverRemoteConnection): return the promise...

GitHub user elliotttf opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/887 fix(DriverRemoteConnection): return the promise on close The jsdoc indicates that the `DriverRemoteConnection.close()` method returns a `Promise`; however, the first time the method is called i

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1994) LazyBarrierStrategy fully responsible for barrier() additions

stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1994: --- Summary: LazyBarrierStrategy fully responsible for barrier() additions Key: TINKERPOP-1994 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1994 Pro

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1822) Repeat should depth first search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16530125#comment-16530125 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1822: --- Github user spmallette comment

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #838: TINKERPOP-1822: Change default RepeatStep to DF...

Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/838#discussion_r199549370 --- Diff: gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/branch/RepeatStep.java --- @@ -273,11 +300,40 @@ public Repea

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1822) Repeat should depth first search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16530124#comment-16530124 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1822: - I added three JFRs for ana

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1822) Repeat should depth first search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1822: Attachment: default.jfr dfs.jfr bfs.jfr > Repea

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

OK, good to now. I thought that GLV packages would also include the template but I guess that a release candidate for the template wouldn't make much sense for version 3.4.0 right now anyway. So we can better publish a rc of the template for 3.2.10 or 3.3.4 at any time. Am 02.07.2018 um 15:34 sch

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

I've pushed manually El lun., 2 jul. 2018 a las 15:07, escribió: > Shouldn't that also have published a RC version of the new .NET template > or did you publish Gremlin.Net manually without using Maven? > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jorge Bay Gondra > Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juli 20

AW: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

Shouldn't that also have published a RC version of the new .NET template or did you publish Gremlin.Net manually without using Maven? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jorge Bay Gondra Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juli 2018 13:49 An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packag

ASF Board Draft Report - July 2018

Here is the draft of the January 2018 board report - please let me know if there is anything else to add. --- ## Description: Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases (OLTP) and graph analy

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

Thanks Stephen! I've published 3.4.0-rc1 on nuget.org: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Gremlin.Net/3.4.0-rc1 It's ok to maintain RC for historical reasons :) El lun., 2 jul. 2018 a las 13:10, Stephen Mallette () escribió: > Since you have access to the node repo, I see no reason not to give you

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

Since you have access to the node repo, I see no reason not to give you access to the nuget one as well - invitation sent. > For next time, shouldn't we use "alpha/beta" instead of "rc"? rc denotes code completion, no further API changes. I think we've taken a fairly loose meaning of "release ca

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

I've published 3.4.0-rc1 on npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/gremlin?activeTab=versions I don't have access to publish Gremlin.Net on nuget.org, can anyone grant me access? El lun., 2 jul. 2018 a las 11:45, Jorge Bay Gondra (< jorgebaygon...@gmail.com>) escribió: > About npm, within the "lates

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

About npm, within the "latest" distribution tag , it sorts by date on their web UI but the dependencies are resolved correctly according to semver and tilde/caret notations, so there isn't much to worry about except that the latest shown on the website is not *t