[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665752#comment-16665752
]
Matthew Allen commented on TINKERPOP-2070:
--
Could I suggest this be added to
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-2082:
---
Summary: g:Set type is not be validated in some variant tests
Key: TINKERPOP-2082
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2082
Project: Tink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kuppitz closed TINKERPOP-2062.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3.5
3.4.0
> Add Traversa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665561#comment-16665561
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2062:
---
dkuppitz closed pull request #
[ pull request closed by dkuppitz ]
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/971 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
@spmallette Let me look at how this scenario stuff works. I will add one that
return a list.
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/964 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
I re-ran the travis build and the error is gone. probably a fluke of travis or
something. I guess this is good now. do you happen to know if there is a test
for the alternative scenario somewhere (i.e. where a set becomes a list)?
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665403#comment-16665403
]
Daniel C. Weber commented on TINKERPOP-2067:
I revised the test to force
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665372#comment-16665372
]
Daniel C. Weber commented on TINKERPOP-2067:
I meant only that build job
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665354#comment-16665354
]
Florian Hockmann edited comment on TINKERPOP-2067 at 10/26/18 4:10 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665354#comment-16665354
]
Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-2067:
-
What do you mean with "onl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665343#comment-16665343
]
Daniel C. Weber edited comment on TINKERPOP-2067 at 10/26/18 4:01 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665343#comment-16665343
]
Daniel C. Weber edited comment on TINKERPOP-2067 at 10/26/18 4:00 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665343#comment-16665343
]
Daniel C. Weber commented on TINKERPOP-2067:
It is, but why only for that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665337#comment-16665337
]
Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-2074:
-
The fix was really trivial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Florian Hockmann closed TINKERPOP-2074.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Florian Hockmann
Fix Version/s: 3.3.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665306#comment-16665306
]
Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-2067:
-
It's a bit hard to find a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665303#comment-16665303
]
Daniel C. Weber commented on TINKERPOP-2067:
I don't have enough insight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665290#comment-16665290
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2081:
---
artem-aliev opened a new pull
call rdd.count() action to trigger the caching
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/973 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665251#comment-16665251
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2067:
---
danielcweber opened a new pull
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2067
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/972 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Artem Aliev created TINKERPOP-2081:
--
Summary: PersistedOutputRDD materialises rdd lazily with Spark 2.x
Key: TINKERPOP-2081
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2081
Project: TinkerPop
I'm +0 on formalizing too muchsome common sense like "release next
cycle unless someone can provide a proof of concept or just feels strongly
otherwise" is fine by me.
> If you're going to reopen tp32, then I'll retarget
sounds good - thanks for staying up on the "security" stuff
On Fri, Oct
If you're going to reopen tp32, then I'll retarget
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/969
Robert Dale
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:56 AM Robert Dale wrote:
> So to answer your earlier question on security fixes, the driver should be
> our security policy ;-)
>
> For example, if tp32 is not
So to answer your earlier question on security fixes, the driver should be
our security policy ;-)
For example, if tp32 is not officially closed and accepts bug fixes, and
given "security problems are just bugs" [1], then tp32 should get
security-related bug fixes.
We can use CVSS [2] to score vu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16665039#comment-16665039
]
Jorge Bay commented on TINKERPOP-2027:
--
That sounds good! It would be the same a
tp32...
i started thinking that we could keep a JIRA ticket open that had a list of
bugs we might backport to tp32 should we have some triggering event,
buti dunno. maybe we go with a first step at this and re-open the
branch but just ship security+bug fixes at it and not try to wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16664909#comment-16664909
]
Matthew Allen commented on TINKERPOP-2027:
--
[~jorgebg] okay, I'll get workin
sgtm, VOTE +1
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/971 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16664796#comment-16664796
]
Jorge Bay commented on TINKERPOP-2027:
--
I think it would be best for the definit
31 matches
Mail list logo
