Thanks for taking 3.2.9 Robert. 3.3.3 is still up for grabs if anyone else
wants to take that one.
We still need to merge these three PRs:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/854 - needs a VOTE still before
merge
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/858 and
https://github.com/apache/
I'll take 3.2.9
Robert Dale
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> Seems like we're all on board with getting a quick turnaround release out
> the door. At this point the groovy fix is now in place and Jorge has both
> TINKERPOP-1943/1944 prepared. Unless there are other maj
Seems like we're all on board with getting a quick turnaround release out
the door. At this point the groovy fix is now in place and Jorge has both
TINKERPOP-1943/1944 prepared. Unless there are other major issues anyone
wants to bring up, we should consider a code freeze starting this friday
and p
sgtm, I'm also +1 on releasing patch releases asap to fix it.
Regarding gremlin-javascript, we could include TINKERPOP-1944 (I just
submitted a pull request) but I'm not sure we can include TINKERPOP-1943,
the implementation is trivial but it will require some changes to make the
test suite pass w
+1
Robert Dale
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> Based on:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de4ec9054fd7a88cbd42163a0b1050
> 19aae52a7e930b09a9bd4c971d@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E
>
> We have a pretty serious bug that I can't seem to find a workaround for.
>
Based on:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de4ec9054fd7a88cbd42163a0b105019aae52a7e930b09a9bd4c971d@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E
We have a pretty serious bug that I can't seem to find a workaround for.
The only workaround I can think of would be to replace this:
Lambda.function("it.get()")
