[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: Additions to hadoop-gremlin conf...

Github user dkuppitz commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/170#discussion_r64518418 --- Diff: hadoop-gremlin/conf/hadoop-graphson.properties --- @@ -28,14 +28,43 @@ gremlin.hadoop.jarsInDistributedCache=true # the vertex

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1310) Allow OLAP to return properties as Detached

stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1310: --- Summary: Allow OLAP to return properties as Detached Key: TINKERPOP-1310 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1310 Project: TinkerPop

[DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and 3.2.1 and I wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to do a release and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" distributions and artifacts. thoughts?

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP-818 Consider a P.type(...

Github user spmallette commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/206#issuecomment-221395541 @dkuppitz This PR kinda died - is it worth keeping it open? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP-818 Consider a P.type(...

Github user dkuppitz closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/206 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP-818 Consider a P.type(...

Github user dkuppitz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/206#issuecomment-221398753 Probably not. As @okram said "limited use cases" and then there's an open question on how to handle those things properly in different languages. Since

Re: [DISCUSS] Oldest open PR

yeah - the "fragility" was something i'd hoped to see addressed. the PR has a long way to go to be something that could be really merged i think. Note that groovysh does have: http://cndoc.github.io/groovy-doc-cn/en/groovysh.html#GroovyShell-doc so they already have something like this. it just

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1298) Save OLAP results to file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15298817#comment-15298817 ] Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1298: --- Because I'm sure that I will forget anything

Re: [DISCUSS] Oldest open PR

That's unfortunate, I liked the idea. However, most of the code was written to scrape content from web pages - that's a pretty fragile approach. That said, it looks like we wouldn't lose a lot if we drop it. Thus, no objections from my side. Cheers, Daniel On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:56 PM,

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: Do not include TraversalMetrics ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/195 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-818) Consider a P.type()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15298914#comment-15298914 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-818: -- Github user spmallette commented on the pull

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-818) Consider a P.type()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15298868#comment-15298868 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-818: -- Github user spmallette commented on the pull

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP-818 Consider a P.type(...

Github user spmallette commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/206#issuecomment-221401320 cool - please close up the JIRA issue too if the intention is to never do this at all. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1003) Setting up latest/current links for bins and docs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15298937#comment-15298937 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1003: --- Github user spmallette commented on the pull

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP-1003 Setting up latest...

Github user lewismc commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/317#issuecomment-221380642 :( --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: TINKERPOP-1003 Setting up latest...

Github user spmallette commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/317#issuecomment-221404811 weird - i never noticed that you replied to my post in jira @lewismc - i'll just say that i basically agree with what you wrote there. we can push off

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop pull request: Do not include TraversalMetrics ...

Github user spmallette commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/195#issuecomment-221402006 Had a talk with @rjbriody - this PR can be closed as its stale at this point, but the JIRA ticket should stay open. --- If your project is set up for

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1078) Do not include TraversalMetrics cap in profile results.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15298920#comment-15298920 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1078: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: