[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop issue #325: TINKERPOP-1321 Introduce Kryo shim to suppor...

2016-06-02 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/325 Thanks for the comments and for running the tests. @okram: 1. I also dislike HadoopPools and would prefer to remove it, but I don't know how to do it correctly, even

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop issue #325: TINKERPOP-1321 Introduce Kryo shim to suppor...

2016-06-03 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/325 Additional notes from Marko: > okay, so as long as there is never a need for MyRegistrar, then can you please update your PR accordingly? > Finally, call it GryoReg

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop issue #325: TINKERPOP-1321 Introduce Kryo shim to suppor...

2016-06-06 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/325 I saw the `shouldHandleMonthDay` test failure on CI and pushed a fix. I carelessly broke the read leg of that serializer while doing some tedious, boilerplate-y method signature changes

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop issue #325: TINKERPOP-1321 Introduce Kryo shim to suppor...

2016-06-06 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/325 These questions involved a lot of back-and-forth that would have been slow to resolve on github comments, so and I discussed the failures and the code on a hangout earlier today

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop issue #325: TINKERPOP-1321 Introduce Kryo shim to suppor...

2016-06-03 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/325 The problem is that GryoSerializer doesn't actually work. This is not the first time it has shown behavior on Spark or scala runtime classes which diverges from the behavior of Spark's

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop issue #325: TINKERPOP-1321 Introduce Kryo shim to suppor...

2016-06-03 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/325 @spmallette You're right about overrides being the problem. The last thing I did before opening this PR was to rebase on latest master, when I encountered conflicts solely

[GitHub] incubator-tinkerpop issue #325: TINKERPOP-1321 Introduce Kryo shim to suppor...

2016-06-06 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/325 Just a reminder: we are voting on branch https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/tree/TINKERPOP-1321. That subsumes the PR and adds a combination of fixes from Marko and me

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #372: DSP-1397 Fix StarGraph addEdge for self-edges

2016-08-03 Thread dalaro
GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/372 DSP-1397 Fix StarGraph addEdge for self-edges StarGraph has directionally-specific classes for its edges: * StarInEdge * StarOutEdge StarIn(/Out)Edges belong only

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #377: TINKERPOP-1397 StarGraph filtering with self ed...

2016-08-10 Thread dalaro
GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/377 TINKERPOP-1397 StarGraph filtering with self edges See: * old PR #372 * JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1397 You can merge this pull request into a Git

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #378: TINKERPOP-1397 Fix StarGraph.addEdge

2016-08-10 Thread dalaro
GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/378 TINKERPOP-1397 Fix StarGraph.addEdge See: * old PR #372 * JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1397 As far as I can tell, GraphFilter did not exist

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #372: DSP-1397 Fix StarGraph addEdge for self-edges

2016-08-10 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/372 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #372: DSP-1397 Fix StarGraph addEdge for self-edges

2016-08-10 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/372 I'm closing this not because the conversation is settled and everything's done, but because this PR is superseded by #377. We can keep discussing here if you like. That's probably easier than

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #:

2016-07-06 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/f9706a38fbe546c0a7e5b038a6b99303d21aec01#commitcomment-18144496 @okram i don't understand the failure this caused, but the change seems innocuous to me... no objections --- If your project

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #372: DSP-1397 Fix StarGraph addEdge for self-edges

2016-08-05 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/372 Thanks for the replies. @spmallette I will investigate whether this behavior also exists on 3.1 and retarget if so. I think this will involve making a standalone test instead of just

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #462: TINKERPOP-1525 Avoid starting VP worker iterations tha...

2016-10-25 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/462 I force-pushed this branch with a fix (`emptyIterator -> emptyList`). --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If y

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #462: TINKERPOP-1525 Avoid starting VP worker iterations tha...

2016-10-25 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/462 I made a version of this change for TINKERPOP-1389 as #466. That one's optional, but I thought merging this into TINKERPOP-1389 might help ensure this fix does not get lost in the eventual

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #462: TINKERPOP-1525 Avoid starting VP worker iterati...

2016-10-24 Thread dalaro
GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/462 TINKERPOP-1525 Avoid starting VP worker iterations that never end SparkExecutor.executeVertexProgramIteration was written in such a way that an empty RDD partition would cause it to invoke

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #462: TINKERPOP-1525 Avoid starting VP worker iterations tha...

2016-10-25 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/462 Marko's right, I wrote and tested this against TINKERPOP-1389 (before the latest rebase), then cherry-picked against current master without retesting. Sorry about that. He's also right about

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #497: Limit JVM system props passed around in Spark j...

2016-11-17 Thread dalaro
GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/497 Limit JVM system props passed around in Spark jobs Prior to this commit, SGC indiscriminately set the entire job config as JVM system properties on Spark executors. It didn't account

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #616: TINKERPOP-1680 Add string performance options t...

2017-05-26 Thread dalaro
GitHub user dalaro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/616 TINKERPOP-1680 Add string performance options to StarGraph By default, StarGraph invokes intern() on vertex label and property key strings. It also toString()s vertex and edge IDs

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #616: TINKERPOP-1680 Add string performance options to StarG...

2017-05-30 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/616 @spmallette maybe -- basis of the PR branch is b755788c6fe7b902a3e81f3c2f11eb5a8b02c4be (May 11). I'll rebase on latest tp32 and force-push the PR branch. --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #616: TINKERPOP-1680 Add string performance options to StarG...

2017-05-30 Thread dalaro
Github user dalaro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/616 I force-pushed this PR's branch. The new basis is 4f7b8595bbcd691649e63e49deb9ed0adcaa81e7 (May 28). --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear