Hi Remy,
I saw you taking over classes from commons modeler into tc 6. Just
yesterday William Barker commited a very small and non-risky patch I
submitted two years ago to bugzilla against Registry.convertValue():
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31608
The method has
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 02:00:57 2006
New Revision: 390055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390055view=rev
Log:
- Add missing patch (I didn't update from sources before merging).
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/modeler/Registry.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39149.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 05:27:59 2006
New Revision: 390120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390120view=rev
Log:
- Remove modeler.
- Fix CRLF.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/.classpath
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/.classpath
URL:
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 05:32:04 2006
New Revision: 390124
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390124view=rev
Log:
- Move output so that Eclipse doesn't pollute the useful classes folder with
his junk.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/.classpath
Modified:
Costin Manolache wrote:
You could easily remove them from your tree.
Do you have any valid reason to no longer have the files ? I remember
for 4.x people felt they were usefull. I'm not sure 'I can't ignore
them easily' or 'I don't need them' is a real -1 reason. ( and by
'I'll remove them from
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39149.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: mturk
Date: Thu Mar 30 06:25:42 2006
New Revision: 390144
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390144view=rev
Log:
Fix sprintf formating warnings.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Thu Mar 30 06:32:04 2006
New Revision: 390147
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390147view=rev
Log:
Copy/paste error. Remove extra format.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c
URL:
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 07:08:31 2006
New Revision: 390155
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390155view=rev
Log:
- Clean up a bit.
- For some reason, trying to recycle a static digester doesn't improve
performance.
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 07:10:13 2006
New Revision: 390157
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390157view=rev
Log:
- Standardize on the digester (which is apparently a bit faster than using
DOM). This way, digester
now handles all XML parsing in Catalina.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39149.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 3/30/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
You could easily remove them from your tree.
Do you have any valid reason to no longer have the files ? I remember
for 4.x people felt they were usefull. I'm not sure 'I can't ignore
them easily' or 'I don't need
Costin Manolache wrote:
I was going to ask - when did our policy changed to use windows line endings
???
I was a bit annoyed to see windows ending as well, it looks bad on unix and
mac.
There's a config in svn for that, I think, and for some reason it's not
the default.
Rémy
I don't know about svn - but the repository itself should be in unix format,
or at least that used to be
the convention. I'm not the tab and line ending police - but it would be
good to be consistent, it's really
ugly to have files with both windows and unix line ending.
Costin
On 3/30/06, Remy
On 3/30/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I was going to ask - when did our policy changed to use windows line endings
???
I was a bit annoyed to see windows ending as well, it looks bad on unix and
mac.
There's a config in svn for that, I think, and
On 3/30/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/30/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I was going to ask - when did our policy changed to use windows line
endings
???
I was a bit annoyed to see windows ending as well, it looks bad on unix
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 09:40:57 2006
New Revision: 390187
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390187view=rev
Log:
- Revert fix for 38113, which doesn't seem to be a bug, and appears to be
causing regressions.
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 09:41:19 2006
New Revision: 390188
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390188view=rev
Log:
- Revert fix for 38113, which doesn't seem to be a bug, and appears to be
causing regressions.
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 30 09:42:06 2006
New Revision: 390189
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390189view=rev
Log:
- Copy the XML descriptors.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39130.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
21 matches
Mail list logo
