DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42085.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Hi there is new quality check release available from:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/
It contains few minor fixes mostly for documentation
and release script (owner/group for .tar)
I'll give it 24 hours before making a tag for any
last minute checks.
+1 for NetWare,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Here is a revised patch for the memory leak.
One thing I noticed is that it goes a little farther than I think it does.
Since every request processor gets registered with JMX, I just couldn't
find a spot where it was unregistered.
And since the name was dynamic,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41956.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41956.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Filip,
I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not
working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't deregistered:
Access Log:
'127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46 /cometchat/?null - - - 200 0.001
'127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46 /cometchat/chat?null 'connect'
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yoav
On 4/11/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.11/
Rémy
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hi Filip,
I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not
working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't deregistered:
So far the patch is only for NIO, I will make it for APR and JIO today.
Access Log:
'127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46
diff to our last candidate and simple build on Solaris look good :)
Mladen Turk wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
The quality check release was out few days ago.
Hi there is new quality check release available from:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/
It contains few minor fixes
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:53:06 2007
New Revision: 527964
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=527964
Log:
Don't unmark the object as a comet, if we do, it will not call the cleanup for
it
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProcessor.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Filip,
I have testet with NIO and the memory leak is still there.
Peter
Am 12.04.2007 um 16:29 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hi Filip,
I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not
working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Thu Apr 12 08:34:51 2007
New Revision: 527981
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=527981
Log:
- 42085: The handlers for the root logger are now added in addLogger when they
are explicitly specified.
Modified:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
HI Filip,
with your last checkin my trace changed but leak is there. Also I got
a exception too:
yes, still working on it,
Filip
12.04.2007 17:20:30 org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioSelectorPool
getSharedSelector
INFO: Using a shared selector for servlet write/read
Yoav Shapira wrote:
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag.
Rémy
David Jencks wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/GERONIMO-3010-4.patch
In addition, this one combines the InstanceManager interfaces. I think
this is a bad idea because it forces jasper to use an interface shared
with catalina, which the previous patch does not.
+1
Peter
Am 12.04.2007 um 18:13 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 18:13 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42104.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag.
much appreciated, I'm
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/
GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the
InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it
forces jasper to use an interface
Author: mturk
Date: Thu Apr 12 11:47:35 2007
New Revision: 528084
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528084
Log:
Mark version for a release.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Thu Apr 12 11:52:18 2007
New Revision: 528085
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528085
Log:
made a copy
Added:
tomcat/connectors/tags/jk1.2.x/JK_1_2_22/
- copied from r528084, tomcat/connectors/trunk/
David Jencks wrote:
Excellent, thanks! Would this be shortly after 6.0.11 is out or further
in the future? If you have any guess about a date it would be much
appreciated.
No idea. For example, I thought 6.0.11 would be ok, but it's not. I
don't know if I'll commit as is either, since I
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Apr 12 19:28:01 2007
New Revision: 528323
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528323
Log:
Fix the handling of the Http11NioProcessors when the thread pool can be
shrinking and growing.
So we are not associating the processor with a thread local, instead going
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Apr 12 20:22:29 2007
New Revision: 528341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528341
Log:
Updated with some useful info
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
URL:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Apr 12 21:19:09 2007
New Revision: 528347
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528347
Log:
Since we can keep alive a HTTP connection, even after we have stopped using it
as a comet, then we need to go back to the original timeout
Modified:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
much appreciated, I'm still working on the deregistering of the JMX
resources, somehow they are slipping through the cracks
Originally, the purpose of the JMX stuff was to provide thread
monitoring. Now that the processors are not tied to
33 matches
Mail list logo