DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42085] - java.util.Logging duplicated since 5.5.23. 5.5.20 is OK

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42085. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

2007-04-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Hi there is new quality check release available from: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/ It contains few minor fixes mostly for documentation and release script (owner/group for .tar) I'll give it 24 hours before making a tag for any last minute checks. +1 for NetWare,

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

2007-04-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Here is a revised patch for the memory leak. One thing I noticed is that it goes a little farther than I think it does. Since every request processor gets registered with JMX, I just couldn't find a spot where it was unregistered. And since the name was dynamic,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41956] - New HTTP connector - The ip address not saved within server.xml

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41956. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41956] - New HTTP connector - The ip address not saved within server.xml

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41956. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

2007-04-12 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Filip, I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't deregistered: Access Log: '127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46 /cometchat/?null - - - 200 0.001 '127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46 /cometchat/chat?null 'connect'

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

2007-04-12 Thread Yoav Shapira
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yoav On 4/11/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.11/ Rémy

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

2007-04-12 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Filip, I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't deregistered: So far the patch is only for NIO, I will make it for APR and JIO today. Access Log: '127.0.0.1:30014' 2007-04-12 13:05:46

Re: Tagging 1.2.22

2007-04-12 Thread Rainer Jung
diff to our last candidate and simple build on Solaris look good :) Mladen Turk wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, The quality check release was out few days ago. Hi there is new quality check release available from: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk-1.2.22-dev/ It contains few minor fixes

svn commit: r527964 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProcessor.java

2007-04-12 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 07:53:06 2007 New Revision: 527964 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=527964 Log: Don't unmark the object as a comet, if we do, it will not call the cleanup for it Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProcessor.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

2007-04-12 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Filip, I have testet with NIO and the memory leak is still there. Peter Am 12.04.2007 um 16:29 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists: Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Filip, I have test your patch with my comet testclient. It seems not working. The RequestProcessors JMX Objects aren't

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r527981 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoaderLogManager.java

2007-04-12 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Thu Apr 12 08:34:51 2007 New Revision: 527981 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=527981 Log: - 42085: The handlers for the root logger are now added in addLogger when they are explicitly specified. Modified:

Re: memory leak with shrinking thread pools

2007-04-12 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Peter Rossbach wrote: HI Filip, with your last checkin my trace changed but leak is there. Also I got a exception too: yes, still working on it, Filip 12.04.2007 17:20:30 org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioSelectorPool getSharedSelector INFO: Using a shared selector for servlet write/read

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

2007-04-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag. Rémy

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

2007-04-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
David Jencks wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it forces jasper to use an interface shared with catalina, which the previous patch does not.

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

2007-04-12 Thread Peter Rossbach
+1 Peter Am 12.04.2007 um 18:13 schrieb Remy Maucherat: Yoav Shapira wrote: After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42103] New: - Parans trustStoreType trustStorePass trustStoreFile

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42103. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

2007-04-12 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 18:13 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42104] New: - Tomcat crash unespected

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42104. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

2007-04-12 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so, things look good to me. Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag. much appreciated, I'm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.23

2007-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

2007-04-12 Thread David Jencks
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: David Jencks wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/ GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it forces jasper to use an interface

svn commit: r528084 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h

2007-04-12 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Thu Apr 12 11:47:35 2007 New Revision: 528084 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528084 Log: Mark version for a release. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_version.h URL:

svn commit: r528085 - /tomcat/connectors/tags/jk1.2.x/JK_1_2_22/

2007-04-12 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Thu Apr 12 11:52:18 2007 New Revision: 528085 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528085 Log: made a copy Added: tomcat/connectors/tags/jk1.2.x/JK_1_2_22/ - copied from r528084, tomcat/connectors/trunk/

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

2007-04-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
David Jencks wrote: Excellent, thanks! Would this be shortly after 6.0.11 is out or further in the future? If you have any guess about a date it would be much appreciated. No idea. For example, I thought 6.0.11 would be ok, but it's not. I don't know if I'll commit as is either, since I

svn commit: r528323 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/coyote/ java/org/apache/coyote/http11/ java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/ webapps/docs/config/

2007-04-12 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 19:28:01 2007 New Revision: 528323 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528323 Log: Fix the handling of the Http11NioProcessors when the thread pool can be shrinking and growing. So we are not associating the processor with a thread local, instead going

svn commit: r528341 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml

2007-04-12 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 20:22:29 2007 New Revision: 528341 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528341 Log: Updated with some useful info Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml URL:

svn commit: r528347 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProcessor.java

2007-04-12 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Apr 12 21:19:09 2007 New Revision: 528347 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528347 Log: Since we can keep alive a HTTP connection, even after we have stopped using it as a comet, then we need to go back to the original timeout Modified:

Re: Candidate binaries for 6.0.11

2007-04-12 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: much appreciated, I'm still working on the deregistering of the JMX resources, somehow they are slipping through the cracks Originally, the purpose of the JMX stuff was to provide thread monitoring. Now that the processors are not tied to