Re: What new in Tomcat 6.0 ?

2007-09-06 Thread Ashish Jain
Hi!! Thanks a lot for the quick response. I also want to know how these changes leads to performance improvement. Thanks and Regards Ashish On 9/6/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ashish Jain wrote: Hi All!! I am new to Tomcat. Can someone tell me what is new in Tomcat

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: you start to sound like you believe yourself by this point. After my vacation, I'll pull out the emails you wrote, where, even though it was a veto, you clearly specified to leave it in. I will also pull out the email, where I offered to elaborate more, and you

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: you start to sound like you believe yourself by this point. After my vacation, I'll pull out the emails you wrote, where, even though it was a veto, you clearly specified to leave it in. I will also pull out the email, where I offered to

Re: Draft for September 2007 Board report

2007-09-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 9/3/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We need to file the board report by next week for a board meeting on September 19th. Here is my draft, so please fill in the gaps, since it's my first one :) Seems to me that theres a serious community issue here in TomcatLand - with two

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ? It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant. We had CTR policy till now and it was working. Now we have a new situation with different developers POVs, and cause of that, this

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I get more and more provocations from you, for example on the Servlet expert group, where you could not resist alluding to this conflict in your introduction. huh? it was a mere reference that we are working on the same project, twist it anyway you want. Ok. It

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 9/6/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant. I agree with that. We had CTR policy till now and it was working. It's still working. We've already voted to move the current trunk into a special sandbox, with no loss of

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ? It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant. We had CTR policy till now and it was working. Now we have a new situation with different developers POVs, and cause

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hey, On 9/6/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the comments were that it was too annoying to do for casual bugfixing, and it's true it's not justified for all patches. Maybe a finer rule could be devised, something like using a RtisTC (tis = the important stuff) model. To

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 9/6/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we need it? Yes, if we wish to survive as a project. It's pain in the ass, I know, but IMHO it's also the only way to get some sense in this chaos. I disagree. I think the current CTR policy has worked just fine and

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007-09-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: To give an idea, tis could mean: - API changing patches (any protected or above signature change) - code changes in the critical path (for example, code which gets executed on each HTTP request) Fine. - any other commit for which a committer asks for the RTC procedure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35941] - Wrong remote IP reported when using AJP and APR

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35941. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35941] - Wrong remote IP reported when using AJP and APR

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35941. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42729] - Documentation - Installation - JDK Not JRE

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42729. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41513] - JSP examples don't work and don't display source

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41513. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42188] - Missing Source File Headers and Copyright statements

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42188. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41463] - Exception report with IE but not firefox!

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41463. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35941] - Wrong remote IP reported when using AJP and APR

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35941. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41827] - Not support SSI

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41827. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35941] - Wrong remote IP reported when using AJP and APR

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35941. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42729] - Documentation - Installation - JDK Not JRE

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42729. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41538] - Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41868] - Not able to start the Tomcat 6.0.10 in WinXP as a Service with JRE 1.6.0

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41868. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36121] - Including JSP's changes working directory

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36121. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40528] - missing error message localisations

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40528. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41430] - JkOptions +ForwardDirectories with Apache's DirectoryIndex

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41430. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43126] - Webapp Classloader put exclusive locks on (DB2) JDBC driver native library?

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43126. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41538] - Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6

2007-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.