Bug report for Taglibs [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 7 [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 6 [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2011/06/26]

2011-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.06.2011 01:45, bradleymccrorey wrote: I'll be watching this quite closely. We run thousands of TC6 instances onsite here, and are a daemontools shop. This change breaks daemontools, as the svc command will attempt to stop the tomcat service by sending a TERM to the catalina.sh process,

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread bradleymccrorey
Rainer Jung-3 wrote: Did you follow the later messages in this discusison thread? I made an error in not including all quotes use din catalina.sh in my simpl test script. So when using the correct scripts, the eval did *not* leave a copy of the shel process hanging around. I

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.06.2011 17:35, bradleymccrorey wrote: Rainer Jung-3 wrote: Did you follow the later messages in this discusison thread? I made an error in not including all quotes use din catalina.sh in my simpl test script. So when using the correct scripts, the eval did *not* leave a copy of

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread bradleymccrorey
Rainer Jung-3 wrote: You can clearly see here that there are two processes: one for the shell script, and one for the actual java process. Is this not what I should be seeing? You should, bot only when using run, which is precisely meant to not decouple the console from the process.

svn commit: r1139904 - /tomcat/trunk/bin/catalina.sh

2011-06-26 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Jun 26 18:34:10 2011 New Revision: 1139904 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1139904view=rev Log: Use eval exec instead of eval for catalina.sh run. Originally it was exec before we switched to eval which leaves an additional intermediate shell process hanging around.

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

2011-06-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.06.2011 17:59, bradleymccrorey wrote: Rainer Jung-3 wrote: You can clearly see here that there are two processes: one for the shell script, and one for the actual java process. Is this not what I should be seeing? You should, bot only when using run, which is precisely meant to