[Bug 53112] Following asynchronous responses do not contain set response headers

2012-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53112 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 53112] Following asynchronous responses do not contain set response headers

2012-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53112 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID -- You are

[jira] [Commented] (MTOMCAT-149) Error deploying on Tomcat 6

2012-05-03 Thread *$^¨%`£
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267302#comment-13267302 ] Olivier Lamy (*$^¨%`£) commented on MTOMCAT-149: do you have at least

[Bug 52751] Optimized configuration of the system info displayed in the default error page

2012-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52751 --- Comment #8 from polina.gen...@gmail.com --- Hi, What do you think of my previous comment – in this case should I provide server attribute handling for the AJP connector in addition to the given patch? I’m looking forward hearing from

[jira] [Closed] (MTOMCAT-149) Error deploying on Tomcat 6

2012-05-03 Thread costas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] costas closed MTOMCAT-149. -- Resolution: Fixed Error deploying on Tomcat 6 --- Key:

[jira] [Commented] (MTOMCAT-149) Error deploying on Tomcat 6

2012-05-03 Thread costas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267312#comment-13267312 ] costas commented on MTOMCAT-149: Consider the issue closed, somehow I could not receive

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-trunk-validate (in module tomcat-trunk) failed

2012-05-03 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an issue affecting its community integration.

svn commit: r1333454 - in /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs: changelog.xml config/ajp.xml config/http.xml

2012-05-03 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu May 3 13:42:09 2012 New Revision: 1333454 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1333454view=rev Log: Whitespace police Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/ajp.xml tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml

svn commit: r1333459 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/

2012-05-03 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Thu May 3 13:48:47 2012 New Revision: 1333459 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1333459view=rev Log: Remove svn:mergeinfo property on o/a/c/core. The mergeinfo should be only on the root of the project. Noticed it when reviewing commit e-mail for r1333177 Modified:

buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2012-05-03 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2949 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-trunk-test (in module tomcat-trunk) failed

2012-05-03 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project tomcat-trunk-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[Bug 53186] New: JIoEndpoint LimitLatch will leak if setsockopt is called on a closed socket on Solaris

2012-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 53186 Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org Summary: JIoEndpoint LimitLatch will leak if setsockopt is called on a closed socket on Solaris Severity:

[Bug 53186] JIoEndpoint LimitLatch will leak if setsockopt is called on a closed socket on Solaris

2012-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de --- There might be some relation to BZ53173 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Duplicate String values

2012-05-03 Thread Christopher Schultz
Konstantin, On 5/1/12 11:04 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: On 4/28/12 8:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: I am OK with your proposal, but I do not expect much savings from getting rid of those duplicates. Does YouKit show some estimates? It did, but I closed it long ago so I'll have to

[Bug 53186] JIoEndpoint LimitLatch will leak if setsockopt is called on a closed socket on Solaris

2012-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186 --- Comment #2 from parker0phil parker.p@gmail.com --- Yep looks like a different instance of the same problem to me, didn't find that in my search. (In reply to comment #1) There might be some relation to BZ53173 -- You are