Hi Konstantin,
Since you are going on vacation, should we not expect 7.0.55 until some
point after you return?
Thank you very much for your answer.
Andrew
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2014-07-11 1:05 GMT+04:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm receiving
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test-bio has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #14 from Andy Wang ---
Sorry I didn't mention this in my original bug report, but we didn't simply
just see memory growth. I wouldn't have been worried if it was just that and
it stabilized. The issue is that in a 32-bit envir
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test-bio has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test-nio2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/277
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Sta
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #13 from Andy Wang ---
MaxMemFree does bring memory down slightly every once in a while, but the
memory growth overall continues on an upward trend.
I'm calling it a "leak" because
a) on a 32-bit process, the process eventuall
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test-nio has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test-nio has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/188
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Tested patch v2. The message looks good.
Committed in trunk and tc7.0.x. It will be in 8.0.11 and 7.0.55.
( r1611506 r1611509 )
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 17 23:13:05 2014
New Revision: 1611509
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1611509
Log:
Fix http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Write an error message to Tomcat logs if container background thread exits
unexpectedly.
It is backport of r1611506 from tomca
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 17 23:04:58 2014
New Revision: 1611506
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1611506
Log:
Fix http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Write an error message to Tomcat logs if container background thread exits
unexpectedly.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Created attachment 31827
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31827&action=edit
2014-07-18_tc8_56724_v2.patch
Second version.
It just adds logging and sets "thread = null;" t
2014-07-14 4:08 GMT+04:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
>>
>> Thus far on the Mapper issues
>
> The current progress:
>
All known mapper issues are fixed both in Tomcat 8 and Tomcat 7.
Reloading wait time issue (BZ 56713) is an enhancement request. I
think we may postpone it, until there is some evidence
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Jung ---
As far as I understand this is not really a leak, but a high memory use. Memory
allocated during a request is not freed but available for use during the next
request. If you want to free high memory whic
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56717
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 17 22:38:15 2014
New Revision: 1611496
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1611496
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56717
Allow repeated Mapper.addHost() calls for the same host. E.g. if the host has
been implicitly added by addContextVersion() ca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Jung ---
@Joe: never mind, based on the dev@apr conversation I can now see it is in
r821471.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 17 22:34:53 2014
New Revision: 1611495
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1611495
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56717
Fix duplicate registration of MapperListener during repeated starts of embedded
Tomcat.
Properly unregister it when Tomcat st
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #10 from Andy Wang ---
Couple of more datapoints.
Committed heap stabilized out at 35684k with:
worker.tomcat1.connection_pool_timeout=0
or with
worker.tomcat1.connection_pool_timeout=900
worker.maintain=900
With just
worker.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #9 from Andy Wang ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #2)
> The call mod_jk makes to ap_rflush looks fairly innocuous. That call is also
> made in ws_write if the request is for headers only (e.g. a HEAD request).
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Jung ---
Thanks for sharing Joe.
Are you referring to any of those two?
r821471 | sf | 2009-10-04 09:37:28 +0200 (Sun, 04 Oct 2009) | 3 lines
core, mod_deflate, mod_sed: Reduce memory usage by reusing bucket
br
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56739
Bug ID: 56739
Summary: Error response body generated only occasionally
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.9
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: n
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 17 20:59:03 2014
New Revision: 1611475
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1611475
Log:
Fix "No context found:" warnings from Mapper.addWrappers() ->
findContextVersion() during context startup.
If context has not been started yet, its "AFTER_START" lifecycle event will
co
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56710
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jul 17 20:50:46 2014
New Revision: 1611472
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1611472
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56710
Do not perform wrapper mapping if context is being reloaded,
as such mapping is useless and may fail unexpectedly.
Let mapper
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #7 from Andy Wang ---
Is there a particular submission that can be backported? Or is it something
more complicated than that? It'll be a while before we can get our customers
onto 2.4 unfortunately.
--
You are receiving this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56725
--- Comment #10 from mardkra...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #9)
> I was referring to the discontinuity observed between these two lines of the
> "client server" logs:
>
Yes, it was an exception on the "cli
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #6 from Joe Orton ---
Server version: Apache/2.2.27 (Win32)
this is a 2.2 bug. It's fixed in 2.4.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #5 from Andy Wang ---
I should have mentioned. This is reproducible with Apache 2.2.22 with APR
1.4.5
and 2.2.24 with APR 1.4.6.
I don't recall the exact mod_jk versions from those releases and can get those,
but the same beh
Konstantin,
On 7/17/14, 7:58 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-07-15 23:43 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz :
>> Mark,
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> We have had situations /in production/ where a "single thread" has
>> triggered an OOME .. in a particular case, that thread was trying to
>> pull an unbounded s
GitHub user labes opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/12
fix: MethodParameters_attribute's parameters_count is only 1 byte long
JDK 8 specification, 4.7.24 "The MethodParameters Attribute"
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se8/html/jvms-4.html#jvm
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56725
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to mardkrause from comment #8)
> The first set of logs are the access logs (via configuring the
> AccessLogValve) on the "server server" aka "receiving server". These were
> requested b
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Andy Wang from comment #3)
> I was able to reproduce this both with my own mod_jk as well as with the
> mod_jk binary build from apache.org.
>
> The APR I used to build mine was the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56725
--- Comment #8 from mardkra...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #6)
> What code handles the PUT to these URLs? Are you using Tomcat's WebDAV
> servlet, or something else? If it's something else, then you might wa
Author: violetagg
Date: Thu Jul 17 12:00:15 2014
New Revision: 1611335
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1611335
Log:
Drop the tag in order to get additional fixes.
Removed:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_55/
-
To unsubscribe, e-
2014-07-15 23:43 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz :
> Mark,
>
> (...)
>
> We have had situations /in production/ where a "single thread" has
> triggered an OOME .. in a particular case, that thread was trying to
> pull an unbounded set of results back from a database query and cache
> them in a local
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56726
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56725
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56334
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c.lu...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56731
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56736
marko asplund changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marko.aspl...@gmail.com
--
You ar
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56736
Bug ID: 56736
Summary: IllegalStateException after calling
AsyncContext.dispatch
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
St
44 matches
Mail list logo
