Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.4

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.4 release is now available for voting. > > The major changes compared to the 8.5.3 release are: > > - Correct a regression in the embedded packaging > > - Add the ability to control the degree

buildbot success in on tomcat-8-trunk

2016-07-11 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-8-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-8-trunk/builds/676 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

[Bug 59813] Infinite loop behavior on circular relations of Class-Path entries in Manifest.MF file

2016-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59813 Violeta Georgieva changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

svn commit: r1752217 - in /tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/tomcat/util/scan/StandardJarScanner.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2016-07-11 Thread violetagg
Author: violetagg Date: Mon Jul 11 21:08:12 2016 New Revision: 1752217 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1752217=rev Log: Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59813 Ensure that circular relations of the Class-Path attribute from JAR manifests will be processed correctly.

svn commit: r1752216 - in /tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/tomcat/util/scan/StandardJarScanner.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2016-07-11 Thread violetagg
Author: violetagg Date: Mon Jul 11 21:01:11 2016 New Revision: 1752216 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1752216=rev Log: Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59813 Ensure that circular relations of the Class-Path attribute from JAR manifests will be processed correctly.

Re: Get help to begin bug fixing

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Thomas
On 10/07/2016 07:14, manori priyadarshani wrote: > Hi, > I am a beginner to bug fixing and I built tomcat .Could you please > help me to select easy bug. Welcome to the Tomcat developer community. Generally, it is best to work on something you find interesting. It is much easier to motivate

Should the RequestDispatcher decode the provided path?

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Thomas
This was triggered by a thread on the users list. [1] Tomcat does not, and hasn't as far back as at least 4.1.x, decoded the path provided in the call to getRequestDispatcher(path). I think this might be incorrect. My logic for this is as follows. The servlet spec is clear (see 9.1.1) that path

svn commit: r1752212 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/tomcat/util/scan/StandardJarScanner.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2016-07-11 Thread violetagg
Author: violetagg Date: Mon Jul 11 20:00:21 2016 New Revision: 1752212 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1752212=rev Log: Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59813 Ensure that circular relations of the Class-Path attribute from JAR manifests will be processed correctly.

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-apr (in module tomcat-8.0.x) failed

2016-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
/target/objenesis-2.5-SNAPSHOT.jar -Dexamples.sources.skip=true -Dcommons-daemon.jar=/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/daemon/dist/commons-daemon-20160711.jar -Dtest.openssl.path=/srv/gump/public/workspace/openssl-1.0.2/dest-20160711/bin/openssl -Dexecute.test.nio=false -Dhamcrest.jar

[Bug 59832] SLS/TLS 8.5.3 upgrade from 8.0.32 using NIO2 encoding

2016-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 --- Comment #5 from Steve Mekkelsen Madden --- Created attachment 34029 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34029=edit email response being attached Attached email response back, should have just

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-nio2 (in module tomcat-8.0.x) failed

2016-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
/apache-commons/daemon/dist/bin/commons-daemon-20160711-native-src.tar.gz -Dexamples.sources.skip=true -Dbase.path=/srv/gump/public/workspace/tomcat-8.0.x/tomcat-build-libs -Djdt.jar=/srv/gump/packages/eclipse/plugins/R-4.5-201506032000/ecj-4.5.jar -Dtest.relaxTiming=true -Dcommons-daemon.jar=/srv

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-bio (in module tomcat-8.0.x) failed

2016-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
/daemon/dist/bin/commons-daemon-20160711-native-src.tar.gz -Dexamples.sources.skip=true -Dbase.path=/srv/gump/public/workspace/tomcat-8.0.x/tomcat-build-libs -Djdt.jar=/srv/gump/packages/eclipse/plugins/R-4.5-201506032000/ecj-4.5.jar -Dtest.relaxTiming=true -Dcommons-daemon.jar=/srv/gump/public

[Bug 59832] SLS/TLS 8.5.3 upgrade from 8.0.32 using NIO2 encoding

2016-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko --- > I've had conversations already on the users email Thread: http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/2kkotx5miulpkr2d "SSL/TLS 8.5.3 upgrade from 8.0.32 using NIO2 url encoding

Re: Gump failures

2016-07-11 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Mark, Am 05.07.2016 um 14:27 schrieb Mark Thomas: The Gump failures we are seeing are due to the tests taking more than an hour to run. I've looked through the logs and I don't see any obvious culprits although a second pair of eyes wouldn't hurt. I've made a few changes to the test

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.4

2016-07-11 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2016-07-06 11:42 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.4 release is now available for voting. > > The major changes compared to the 8.5.3 release are: > > - Correct a regression in the embedded packaging > > - Add the ability to control the degree of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.4

2016-07-11 Thread Huxing Zhang
Hi The proposed 8.5.4 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.4 [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.5.4 [ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.4 No test case failure. Examples ok. Our test app works fine.

[Bug 59832] SLS/TLS 8.5.3 upgrade from 8.0.32 using NIO2 encoding

2016-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 --- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat --- The problem is that nobody understood what you were saying or saw what was wrong in the user list, so it's the same here. Please provide a simple test case (no XML framework please) so we