Github user powerYao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/dd401de453cd9503dd4f32e10e1f01e920754fd3#commitcomment-22352750
look like nothing is work
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user powerYao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/9b3dc6eb9baf00050ca486fa3d6227a6dd6af1af#commitcomment-22352684
look like good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61137
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.0.20 |unspecified
Target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/30/17 4:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>>> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always
>>> have to have a wrapper for it.
>>
Author: violetagg
Date: Wed May 31 17:17:46 2017
New Revision: 1797076
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1797076=rev
Log:
Correct the requirement for the minimum Java SE version in Application
Developer's Guide. Issue reported via comments.apache.org.
Modified:
Hi all,
On 5/31/2017 1:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 31/05/17 04:07, Coty Sutherland wrote:
I've been thinking about things that we could do for Tomcat to help
bring in new contributors and to be more appealing to new developers.
https://helpwanted.apache.org/
I would like to offer the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58837
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Hauser ---
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Secure_Headers_Project#csp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59179
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Hauser ---
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Secure_Headers_Project#hpkp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61137
Svetlin Zarev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61134
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
It was intentional but I can see that it might look awkward in this particular
instance. I don't mind it but I'm not going to object of the change is reverted
for this one case. I would ask
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46284
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 31/05/17 04:07, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking about things that we could do for Tomcat to help
> bring in new contributors and to be more appealing to new developers.
> Right now we have http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html which has
> a few bullet points and
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/05/17 13:55, Katya Todorova wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Looking at javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagLibraryInfo, uri and prefix
> fields
> > are declared final while according to the spec and tomcat documentation
> > they
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61137
Bug ID: 61137
Summary: TagLibraryInfo uri and prefix fields should not be
final
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: Mac OS X
16 matches
Mail list logo