Title: Message Title
There's 1 new edit on this page
Servlet TCK 5.0
Mark Thomas edited this page
Here's what changed:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64541
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
Interesting.
How are you setting the limit for the JAXP entity expansion... via the system
property "jdk.xml.entityExpansionLimit"?
What's the security justification for the setting of "1" and not,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64541
Bug ID: 64541
Summary: Parsing of mbeans-descriptor.xml files throw errors on
server startup
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.104
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Le 16/06/2020 à 10:02, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> Thoughts?
I'd prefer the status-quo and keep "master", I've always understood this
as the 'master record' (I know it might be historically wrong) and I
haven't seen evidences it has ever offended or deterred anyone from
contributing.
If there is a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64540
--- Comment #1 from rotty3000 ---
While making this change we also have to do an initial pass over the metadata
to make sure it's all still minimally correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
On 19/06/2020 14:38, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 6/9/20 08:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 08/06/2020 22:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> I think that's enough for now. So the questions are:
>>>
>>> 1. Does anyone really want Tomcat to be worried about this stuff?
>>> I know the
On 19/06/2020 15:02, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to refactor a bit and move BaseEncryptionManager and
> associated code out of the EncryptInterceptor class. Where would be a
> good place to put it?
>
> Some potential candidates:
>
> org/apache/catalina/util
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I'd like to refactor a bit and move BaseEncryptionManager and
associated code out of the EncryptInterceptor class. Where would be a
good place to put it?
Some potential candidates:
org/apache/catalina/util
org/apache/catalina/security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/9/20 08:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/06/2020 22:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> I think that's enough for now. So the questions are:
>>
>> 1. Does anyone really want Tomcat to be worried about this stuff?
>> I know the answer is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64540
Bug ID: 64540
Summary: switch from bndwrap task to bnd task
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
rotty3000 commented on pull request #303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/303#issuecomment-646637527
@markt-asf did I miss any other changes you wanted to see?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/16/20 04:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside
> the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git
> branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name
12 matches
Mail list logo