We're also using TC 3.3 on our production systems and are switching to TC 5.5.
The memory penalty is real but you'll be using up to date and actively
maintained stuff with TC 5.5.
Also you could try to reduce the AJP13 / HTTP 11 threads and remove
some JMX Listeners
2006/4/19, Abhi Karmos <[EMAI
BTW, memory leak in Tomcat 3.2 are more than likely.
The question will be, why still using deprecated and no more supported code ?
When I visit the IBM Rochester Labs, in 2001, I recommanded some IBMer
to switch to Tomcat 3.3.x, which is the Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 RI and is
pretty fast and stable.
And what about a tcnative which will build against a static APR ?
Many Linux distributions still have APR 0.9 and as such we need to
modify the Makefile to be able to use a static APR build by hand.
>2006/4/14, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The patch is fine, but I'm actually looking for
And what about a JVM launching others JVMs ?
>From an admin point of vue, only one job/process to start / stop and
monitor, so more simple.
>From a developper point of vue the differents JVM could have the
isolation level required.
2006/4/7, Paul Speed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Reinhard Moosau
2006/4/7, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2006/4/6, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This thread started (for whatever reaso
Very interesting stuff
My german is too bad but from what I could see it seems a good candidate.
Could this works be ported back into ASF Tomcat 5.5.x ? Or better
included in ASF Tomcat ?
>2006/4/7, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey,
>
> Java/JSP and Tomcat for german hoster is a very ba
2006/4/6, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> This thread started (for whatever reason) on the private list as part of
> an unrelated discussion. The point is to see what could be improved to
> make Tomcat more suitable for shared hosting, which is a very nice goal,
> but unfortunately wi
2006/4/6, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jess Holle wrote:
> > Henri Gomez wrote:
> >>
> > We recently saw a customer run into this limitation in that all of their
> > headers, etc, would not fit in the first 8K.
> >
> > Waiting for a new AJP
2006/4/6, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Just take a look at the AJP protocol documentation :
> >
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/common/ajpv13a.html
> >
> > Packets sent from the server to the container begin with 0x12
6, KARNATI, SRINIVASA R [AG/1000] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:57 AM
> >>To: Tomcat Developers List
> >>Subject: Re: configurabl
well client and server should be in phase about the buffer size and
the better way to accomplish that will be via AJP13 extensions (ie
AJP14), with connect time negociation datas like packet buffer size :)
2006/4/5, KARNATI, SRINIVASA R [AG/1000] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >>-Original Messag
+1
2006/3/17, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1 for that,
>
> I can made my tests at weekend.
>
> Regards
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 17.03.2006 um 12:37 schrieb Mladen Turk:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There is quite large list of fixed bugs for mod_jk
> > from the 1.2.15:
> >
> > #37469: Fix shared memo
Yes EBCDIC is everywhere, even on IBM OS/400 (I5/OS) where using each
day at ... work
2006/3/16, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>
> >> One of the patches I need to get TC working with JSP in EBCDIC is the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> Any comments?
> >>
> >
> > Yes. Fix your clock. You live in t
2006/3/16, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 6:40 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Tomcat v5.5.16 Stabil
7;t find apr static link command for MAC OS X. At MAC OS X
> the tcnative library´suffix must be jnilib instead dylib. How I can
> change this?
>
> peter
>
>
>
> Am 16.03.2006 um 15:15 schrieb Henri Gomez:
>
> > 2006/3/16, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
&
2006/3/16, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> >
> > We could comment how to build an APR 1.2.2 ready for static inclusion
> > (easy).
> > But the configure/makefile of tcnative should be adapted
> >
>
> You have the commit r
2006/3/16, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > There is also something to add in tcnative, the support of static link with
> > APR.
> >
> > Many Linux distributions still provided Apache 2.0.x and APR 0.9.x and
> > as such people
There is also something to add in tcnative, the support of static link with APR.
Many Linux distributions still provided Apache 2.0.x and APR 0.9.x and
as such people couldn't use tcnative against APR 0.9.x.
2006/3/16, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And for the majority of u
And for the majority of users the 1.1.1 sources are useless, they want
and use 1.1.2 binaries provided by Mladen :)
2006/3/16, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > Hola,
> > The one thing I don't want to do is repackage 5.5.16. The do nothing
> > option is viable, as is just
[X] Stable (no major issues)
> > [X] Stable (no major issues)
> > [ ] Beta (at least one major issue: please provide details)
> > [ ] Alpha (multiple significant issues: please provide details)
>
>
Well with a tcnative build against APR 1.2.2, one time dynamically and
another time statically it works.
It recall me the old time of mod_webapp where APR was not available.
In many distributions, including Suse, Apache 2.0.x is bundled and as
such only APR 0.9.x is available.
Could we try to mo
Sure, so in this case it's the JNI side, initialize(), which should be
more verbose ?
TCN_IMPLEMENT_CALL(jboolean, Library, initialize)(TCN_STDARGS)
{
UNREFERENCED_STDARGS;
if (!tcn_global_pool) {
if (apr_pool_create(&tcn_global_pool, NULL) != APR_SUCCESS) {
return JNI
no problem
2006/2/28, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Because of the critical AJP bugfix found and fixed earlier today, would
> it be possible to plan releasing a new 5.5.16 build soon ?
>
> Sorry for the trouble (once again ...).
>
> Rémy
>
>
+1 (please)
2006/2/23, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sounds very great
>
> +1
>
> many thanks and now I can start very relaxed to my short journey :-)
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 23.02.2006 um 18:25 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
>
> > Sounds like there is a consensus amongst folks. So to summari
2006/2/21, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > No. Bill gave a wrong answer. He ignored in the fact that
> java.io.tmpdirand
> > javax.servlet.context.tempdir are equivalent in implementation in
> Tomcat,
> > and that to be compliant, Tomcat has to make java.io.tmpdir writable.
>
>
> File.c
A solution could be to implement on the client side an AJP 1.3 protocol
2006/2/10, Prabhu Baskaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi All,
> I wanted to run Socket server program which wud act as a connection to
> another client application which wud provide data from the database...(sort
> of like a clie
+0
PS: Don't have time to work on the iSeries port ;(
2006/2/8, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> There was lots of changes for Tomcat Native that needs a
> new tag and release bump.
> 1. IPV6 support fix
> 2. Bind fix
> 3. sendb(b) fixes
>
> I would like to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_2 l
Did you take a look at jpackage projet www.jpackage.org for prebuild
tomcat 5 Rpms ?
http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=2772
2006/1/31, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bob Herrmann wrote:
> > seems you need both "ant1.5" and "ant1.5" to compile tomcat 5.0
> >
>
> Come one :)
> I think you hav
What about using JMeter ?
Also your test should be from a different computer, may be with 2/3
clients computers against one single server.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
+0
2005/12/23, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Am 23.12.2005 um 20:28 schrieb Yoav Shapira:
>
> > Hi,
> > Are people ready for a 5.5.15 release? I'd specifically like to know
> > that the showstoppers in 5.5.13 and 5.5.14, e.g. the clustering issue
> > just mention
2005/12/22, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 12/22/05, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Less class loaded - and less classes/features you need to worry when
> > > setting up and maintainig is what I meant by footpri
> I didn't do any real benchmark, but the single-jar 5.5 should be as
> fast on startup as 3.3.
good
> Less class loaded - and less classes/features you need to worry when
> setting up and maintainig is what I meant by footprint - Jetty is
> around 0.5M I think.
what's the expected class/size f
2005/12/22, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Well memory is not the only point, faster start and less class to be
> > loaded is also very important for me. In my company we're still using
> > Tomcat 3.3.2 on our production servers (iSerie
2005/12/22, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Well a Tomcat will a small memory footprint is also very interesting for me
> > :)
>
> How is Tomcat memory usage large ? Personally, I would think it's
> extremely reasonable given the f
gt; work fine. But I have a feeling I'm the only one interested in this
> > :-). Removing more features to make it really minimal is quite simple,
> > but requires testing and a bit of work. I don't think we need any new
> > code - just small adjustments and different p
al set of valves to have a TCK-accepted container. Modules ==
> > jdbc authenticators, load balancing, ssl, jk, even APR, and anything
> > that could be eventually released or upgraded independently.
> >
> > Costin
> >
> >
> > On 12/21/05, Henri Gomez <
> Sorry, so far nobody has had the sense to propose returning to the good old
> TC 3.3 Interceptors ;-). It looks like Evolution is here to stay.
I don't know if Interceptors would be a good solutions but I'd really
like to have something similar to Apache modules.
--
2005/12/21, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For Servlet 2.5, the highlights are:
> Requires 1.5 as minimum Java version.
> Needs to support Annotations (probably the biggest project).
> Some minor changes to Sessions to support Portlets.
> A couple of really minor changes to 'web.xml' p
+1
Appart the JSP 2.1, TC 6.0 changes will be in which areas ?
>2005/12/21, Tim Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +0
>
> (+1 - if I can realign my day job duties to free up time to help more :( )
>
> -Tim
>
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Besides adding support for Servlet 2.5 which does not se
Well why so much noise about NIO/APR ?
If some want to experiment APR or NIO, why can't they do their works
on some sort of incubations projets and when stable enough give us
benchmarks results.
Benchmarks/tesings should give us information on :
stability, speed, memory usage, IO usage and of co
For now APR support is automatically detected and eventually used.
So no problem for me to have APR and NIO.
2005/11/19, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List"
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 20
Thanks :)
2005/11/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Author: remm
> Date: Mon Nov 14 07:19:03 2005
> New Revision: 344145
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=344145&view=rev
> Log:
> - Try to delete.
>
> Removed:
> tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/connectors/
> tomcat/current/tc5.5.
oups, bad eclipse manipulation.
Could an admin remove the connectors, container and jasper dirs I
created under tomcat/current/tc5.5.x ?
Sorry for that.
2005/11/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Author: hgomez
> Date: Mon Nov 14 06:42:56 2005
> New Revision: 344135
>
> URL: http://svn
so the dynamic mapping is the solution, and it seems that's why
original jk developpers decided to handling JkMount by hand.
2005/10/30, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/29/05, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > using AJP or HTTP or WHATEVERP prot
using AJP or HTTP or WHATEVERP protocol you want, the current need for
me in my production systems is to be able to add / remove a tomcat
machine to a LoadBalancing farm without having to restart the Apache 2
web server.
A WEB admin (I work with them each days) would like to add / remove a
tomcat
AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new
systems and new webapps.
That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp
behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and
it's sad.
How could it be accomplished, may be via a master tomcat wh
601 - 647 of 647 matches
Mail list logo
