On 07/07/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
As was written early in this my thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Coding-Guidelines%2C-encodings%2C-keywords-td23662661.html
(http://markmail.org/thread/d6dsgrsfvnuzclt7)
there are problems with Subversion
On 16/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 16 19:34:49 2009
New Revision: 794798
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=794798view=rev
Log:
More GSOC work from Xie Xiadong
Initial implementation of RemoteHost and RemoteAddr filters.
Added:
On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
think it should be all in order now
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
There are some differences between the source archives and the SVN tag:
In SVN, but not in source archive:
On 22/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 22 14:29:09 2009
New Revision: 796739
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796739view=rev
Log:
Restore the @Overrides. Eclipse on my Mac wasn't configured right. Sorry for
the noise.
The
On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
think it should be all in order now
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
Eclipse and Findbugs show the following warnings for the non-test code:
Description ResourcePathTypeLocation
Class is a
On 02/07/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 2 17:35:26 2009
New Revision: 790693
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790693view=rev
Log:
break out javadoc into its own target
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/build.xml
On 02/07/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 2 17:08:50 2009
New Revision: 790684
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790684view=rev
Log:
Add some doco, make shared variables volatile
Modified:
On 01/07/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 1 13:19:15 2009
New Revision: 790155
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790155view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43343
Port of r656751, r778523, r778524, r784453
On 29/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jun 29 17:38:21 2009
New Revision: 789392
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789392view=rev
Log:
Remove all usage of GPL or LGPL downloads
On 30/06/2009, rj...@apache.org rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Jun 30 13:26:10 2009
New Revision: 789714
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789714view=rev
Log:
Separate statistics counter lock in FastAsyncSocketSender
from inherited DataSender lock to reduce
On 30/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:15:28 2009
New Revision: 789883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789883view=rev
Log:
Apply patch by sebb from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47458
Store db
On 29/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jun 29 17:38:21 2009
New Revision: 789392
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789392view=rev
Log:
Remove all usage of GPL or LGPL downloads.
+1, thanks.
Use H2 for test database (EPL1.0) as it can
On 27/06/2009, Xie Xiaodong xxd82...@gmail.com wrote:
But how could ThreadLocal be shared among all AccessLogValve instances on
the same server? After all, each thread access ThreadLocal has its own.
Another point, based on the java doc of ThreadLocal, maybe private
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Cleaned up and fixed.
The release is located here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Exactly the same path
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Cleaned up and fixed
When testing with Derby on Java 1.6.0 I get the following error:
[junit] Running org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test.StarvationTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test.StarvationTest
[junit] AbandonedObjectPool is used
(org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.abandonedobjectp...@1d6096)
On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Cleaned up and fixed.
The release is located here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Exactly the same path names were used previously; I assume you are
referring to the following versions of the files:
On 22/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jun 22 11:58:07 2009
New Revision: 787211
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=787211view=rev
Log:
Fix a couple of Eclipse warnings
Modified:
On 22/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
in the spirit of trying to get my poop right,
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Looks a lot better.
the binary releases contain everything in individual jar files (including
source references for IDEs)
Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
662:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
Not sure this double-checked looking offers any benefit ;-)
On 19/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
662:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
Not sure this double-checked looking offers any benefit ;-)
Line
create a new Date
unecessarily.
2009/6/19 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 19/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
662
On 19/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Jun 19 15:05:04 2009
New Revision: 786532
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786532view=rev
Log:
Correct per sebb/markt
Sorry, but this is still incorrect.
The NOTICE is now:
This product includes
On 19/06/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Jun 19 16:16:16 2009
New Revision: 786569
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786569view=rev
Log:
correction
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/NOTICE
Modified:
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are
available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is:
Did you mean 4.1.40?
Also,
On 19/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are
available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
According to the release
On 19/06/2009, kkoli...@apache.org kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Fri Jun 19 18:57:59 2009
New Revision: 786631
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786631view=rev
Log:
Add two more implementations for the second test.
a) using a single ThreadLocal instead of
On 19/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 19 20:21:53 2009
New Revision: 786653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786653view=rev
Log:
Switch to ThreadLocal where possible. This removes all the syncs apart from
those related to accessing
On 18/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
I think this needs to be volatile ?
In (GetDateBenchmarkTest)
+private long currentMillis = 0;
Same for (in TimeDateElementBenchmarkTest)
+private Date currentDate = null;
Of course - since
On 18/06/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
I think this needs to be volatile ?
In (GetDateBenchmarkTest)
+private long currentMillis = 0;
Same for (in TimeDateElementBenchmarkTest
On 19/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
So now that we've clarified that NOTICE and LICENSE covers the entire
release as an entity,
No idea what you mean by that, but anyway:
As I have written several times before, the NOTICE file is incorrect.
This applies to the
On 17/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Sebb, I can't find anything that is broken. All your concerns seem
invalid
to me.
Please revisit, especially the NOTICE files
The copyright year in the NOTICE files in the binary archive is still
2008; surely it should be 2009?
The connectors/NOTICE file in the source archive is wrong.
There are no NOTICE files for the jasper and servletapi directory sub-trees.
It would be better to have a single NL file at the top of
On 16/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jun 16 11:17:26 2009
New Revision: 785164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785164view=rev
Log:
Update exclusion list for EOL filtering
Modified:
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jun 16 11:17:26 2009
New Revision: 785164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785164view=rev
Log:
Update exclusion list
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
There were enough issues to re-roll the release. For the record, I tried
and failed on several machines to recreate the problem sebb saw so I can
only assume it was a local JVM issue.
I've just realised that it might be due to trying to install without
Admin privileges
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
The candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
According
On 16/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Sebb, I can't find anything that is broken. All your concerns seem invalid
to me.
Please revisit, especially the NOTICE files.
Filip
sebb wrote:
On 15/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote
On 15/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Sebb, thanks for the feedback.
sebb wrote:
Apart from the problems with NL files etc that have already been
mentioned, I found the following:
==
The changelog.html file refers to Tomcat JDBC Connection Pool
*v1.0.5
On 12/06/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:38:29 2009
New Revision: 784083
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784083view=rev
Log:
Implement alias resources. Key features:
- configured at the context level in the same way as the other
Apart from the problems with NL files etc that have already been
mentioned, I found the following:
==
The changelog.html file refers to Tomcat JDBC Connection Pool
*v1.0.5-beta* which looks wrong.
==
The documentation for the Interceptors appears to be incorrect.
For example:
The code
On 02/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Martin Dubuc wrote:
What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially
released?
that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be
released.
I've not seen the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail ?
On 25/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/24 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ]
On 21/05/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
There are quite a lot of public mutable static fields in the current
Tomcat6 codebase.
Such fields can allow malicious or accidental changes to occur, so
should be avoided as far as possible.
[And if a class
Here are a few more missing properties:
svn ps svn:eol-style native java/javax/el/LocalStrings_es.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native java/javax/servlet/LocalStrings_es.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native
java/org/apache/catalina/ha/LocalStrings_es.properties
svn ps svn:eol-style native
There are quite a lot of public mutable static fields in the current
Tomcat6 codebase.
Such fields can allow malicious or accidental changes to occur, so
should be avoided as far as possible.
[And if a class has public mutable static fields it's generally
impossible to make it thread-safe.]
The
/tomcat/lite/LiteTestHelper.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
modules/tomcat-lite/test/org/apache/tomcat/test/watchdog/WatchdogHttpClient.java
On 21/05/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 21.05.2009 23:29, sebb wrote:
Here are a few more missing properties:
svn ps svn:eol
On 22/05/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.05.2009 01:07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Guys fix your svn configuration. ;)
This happens to me all the time, as I move between machines very often.
Why is the ~/.subversion/config a
On 22/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, all!
Are there any Coding Guidelines that we ought to follow,
or is our project on our own there?
I am interested in clarifying the following question:
What is the character encoding for our sources.
Our build scripts
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.
All jars should ideally have NL files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.
The EXE fails to install the following file:
RELEASE-NOTES
It also fails to install RUNNING.txt
There are two Tomcat lists in svn-authorization:
tomcat-pmc
tomcat-watchdog
The tomcat-pmc list appears to be the standard list for giving
access to the normal Tomcat SVN development directories, and does not
seem to have anything to do with the Tomcat PMC.
I think all the other lists with -pmc
compile.source=1.5 yet there are several references to features
which require Java 1.6+
On 01/05/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
I was thinking to create a release, (I know I dropped the ball on the last
one), to gather feedback on the code itself.
There have been
On 20/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Looks like we need to run native2ascii over a quite a few French and
German files.
Surely the ISO-8859-1 (Latin-1) character set supports most accents in
Latin languages, so there should be no need to use Unicode escapes
On 20/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 20/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Looks like we need to run native2ascii over a quite a few French and
German files.
Surely the ISO-8859-1 (Latin-1) character set supports most
On 17/04/2009, Kirk True k...@mustardgrain.com wrote:
Hi all,
I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi.
The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it
chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries.
AFAIK it
On 12/04/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 10/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm generally against this find bugs 'may be bugs' issues.
is there an actual bug here
On 14/04/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 14 22:16:53 2009
New Revision: 764985
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=764985view=rev
Log:
Fix secondary issue reported as part of bug47013
Which says:
req.setQueryString(Constants.PRECOMPILE +
On 09/04/2009, jfcl...@apache.org jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Apr 9 16:32:04 2009
New Revision: 763726
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763726view=rev
Log:
Add the Tcp code... Still need the code in httpd-trunk to test it.
Added:
On 10/04/2009, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm generally against this find bugs 'may be bugs' issues.
is there an actual bug here?
Reported bug, no. Bugs uses could hit, yes. Hence why this is in trunk
and not being proposed for backport.
Are
On 09/04/2009, jfcl...@apache.org jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Apr 9 13:00:21 2009
New Revision: 763635
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763635view=rev
Log:
Move the multi logic to MultiCastSender with
the idea to TCP sockets and a list of proxy too.
On 07/04/2009, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.19/
Hashes and sigs look OK, though I only checked the main archives.
There's a packaging problem with the source archives.
I would expect the .zip
On 29/03/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 29.03.2009 19:02, sebb wrote:
On 29/03/2009, rj...@apache.orgrj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Mar 29 14:17:16 2009
New Revision: 759694
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759694view=rev
Log
On 23/03/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
Since it's a new variable,
define new
Has pool been released yet?
one can make it private now without
breaking anything.
Every little helps.
On 23/03/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com
On 23/03/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Mar 23 12:07:36 2009
New Revision: 757381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757381view=rev
Log:
expose the poolname through a public method, this will allow one to retrieve
the actual connection
/ch0002425/quotes
sebb wrote:
On 23/03/2009, fha...@apache.org fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Mar 23 12:07:36 2009
New Revision: 757381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757381view=rev
Log:
expose the poolname through a public method
On 13/03/2009, mt...@apache.org mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Mar 13 07:25:50 2009
New Revision: 753147
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=753147view=rev
Log:
Use inplace rewrite of dot part. We are safe to do that cause sessionid is
allocated for every request
On 13/03/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/03/2009, mt...@apache.org mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Mar 13 07:25:50 2009
New Revision: 753147
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=753147view=rev
Log:
Use inplace rewrite of dot part. We are safe
On 11/03/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Mar 11 19:12:03 2009
New Revision: 752584
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=752584view=rev
Log:
Add missing XML Schemas for Java EE Deployment Descriptors
Unlike the existing schemas, these files are
On 11/03/2009, rj...@apache.org rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Mar 11 21:33:54 2009
New Revision: 752629
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=752629view=rev
Log:
Formally fix JavaDoc.
The JavaDocs are more like dummies though.
Modified:
On 11/03/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Hi Sebb,
On 10.03.2009 21:33, sebb wrote:
On 10/03/2009, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Hi all,
version 1.2.28 of mod_jk is approaching its release. A code snapshot
(revision 752124) is available
On 10/03/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Hi all,
version 1.2.28 of mod_jk is approaching its release. A code snapshot
(revision 752124) is available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.28-dev/
The NOTICE file is non-standard, as it
On 01/03/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Mar 1 12:47:54 2009
New Revision: 749019
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=749019view=rev
Log:
Provide an option to use httpOnly for session cookies. Disabled by default.
...
On 13/02/2009, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Hi,
On 12.02.2009 18:06, Petr Sumbera wrote:
Hi all,
From Tomcat tar archive I get:
ls -l apache-tomcat-6.0.18/conf/tomcat-users.xml
-rw--- 1 tomcat staff 1107 Jul 21 2008
On 15/01/2009, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 15 05:49:53 2009
New Revision: 734706
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=734706view=rev
Log:
Remove unused imports idnetified by Eclipse
Modified:
Tomcat trunk has quite a few Java files without the correct AL headers:
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/NioX509KeyManager.java
modules/bayeux/java/org/apache/tomcat/bayeux/HttpError.java
modules/bayeux/test/org/apache/cometd/bayeux/samples/BayeuxStockTicker.java
AFAICT, the following SVN property settings are missing from tomcat-trunk:
svn ps svn:eol-style native TOMCAT-7-RELEASE-PLAN.txt
svn ps svn:eol-style native
java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/SimpleCoordinator.java
svn ps svn:eol-style native
On 06/12/2008, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there has to be a way to automate this, since I'm a frequent offender, is
there some SVN script we could do?
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt
If you are
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tarball and other packages are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is:
[X] Broken
The sigs and hashes don't agree with their targets, except
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tarball and other packages are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is:
[X] Broken
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tarball and other packages are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tarball and other packages are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
Sorry, just discovered the problem.
The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243.
I'll know next time...
Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have
to use
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had network troubles during the upload and I had to retry several times.
I thought it completed without error but it looks like
apache-tomcat-4.1.39-LE-jdk14.exe got
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tarball and other packages are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
I just ran RAT on the source archive.
There are a lot of source files
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tarball and other packages are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
However, there are several binary files that are different:
connectors/jni/native/os/win32/logmessages.bin
connectors/procrun/bin.../tomcat*.exe
This suggests a packaging error - perhaps these bin files were
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tarball and other packages
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas
I happened to spot the following in ssl.c:
static int jbs_gets(BIO *b, char *out, int outl)
...
int l = (int)strlen(J2S(o));
if (l outl) {
strcpy(out, J2S(o));
ret = outl;
}
...
return ret;
It looks a bit odd to me - I would have expected it to return l rather
than outl.
However, I've
On 18/11/2008, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
I happened to spot the following in ssl.c:
static int jbs_gets(BIO *b, char *out, int outl)
...
int l = (int)strlen(J2S(o));
if (l outl) {
strcpy(out, J2S(o));
ret = outl;
}
...
return ret;
It looks
This is a follow-on from Bugzilla 46209 -
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46209.
Findbugs reported several instances of protected static fields that
were not final.
For example,
ConnectionPool:
protected static Log log = LogFactory.getLog(ConnectionPool.class);
Firstly,
On 15/11/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Nov 15 04:59:01 2008
New Revision: 714246
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=714246view=rev
Log:
Update KEYS with changes from 6.0.x (Remy updated his key)
Are there any releases signed with the old
On 11/11/2008, Anton Khitrenovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We are using IPlanet 6.1 web server, that is based on Catalina 4.1
container. Recently we've run into strange exceptions on Catalina level.
After examining stack trace and relevant code, I see that the problem
originates
On 05/11/2008, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 00:32 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
Yes: is there any reason to not do it?
It does not look actually useful, and I could forget about it (meaning a
lot of wasted time).
Perhaps you could do something like we do for
On 29/10/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:41:09 2008
New Revision: 709018
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=709018view=rev
Log:
Add asynchronous log handling, feature not yet complete. Need to figure out
when to stop the logger
On 09/10/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mark, you are right.
The mime extension is not working on a case insensitive basis. Now my
Tomcat 5.5 does byte serving with the web.xml portion below:
mime-mapping
extensionpdf/extension
On 07/10/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Oct 7 12:10:51 2008
New Revision: 702587
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=702587view=rev
Log:
EG confirmed that attribute values should be fully escaped, including any
EL. Note this does not fix
On 29/09/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 29/09/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ThreadLocals and container classloader environments need careful handling
to avoid memory leaks.
I would have thought that was a good reason to keep the class - one
BTW, Commons LANG has a thread-safe FastDateUtils which can be used
for formatting (but not parsing) dates.
Not sure why you did not just fix DateTool - e.g. by using ThreadLocal
(or indeed synchronizing the use of DateFormats) - rather than fixing
all calls to DateTool.
Or maybe I've
301 - 400 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
