Mark,
On 7/1/21 03:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/06/2021 23:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I don't believe I have any BZ karma at all, but this user has
duplicated old comments and inserted spam URLs into the comment
stream. Can someone kill this stuff?
Yes. Felix or I can do it. I've
On 30/06/2021 23:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I don't believe I have any BZ karma at all, but this user has duplicated
old comments and inserted spam URLs into the comment stream. Can someone
kill this stuff?
Yes. Felix or I can do it. I've just removed it.
Please don't duplicate
All,
I don't believe I have any BZ karma at all, but this user has duplicated
old comments and inserted spam URLs into the comment stream. Can someone
kill this stuff?
-chris
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the
extension
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
--- Comment #11 from jullieverma ---
Since this is at best an enhancement, it can be considered fixed in Tomcat 8
which includes a rewrite valve that can easily do this sort of matching.
Documentation available here: https://www.callandys.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
jullieverma changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://cutt.ly/Bmo9ZOE
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
--- Comment #5 from Karl Peterbauer k...@peterbauer.cc ---
I think both the Servlet spec and Tomcat's implementation are quite
unfortunate. Patterns like '*.jsp' or '*.my.txt' closely resemble the venerable
UNIX glob style pattern matching,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
--- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org ---
As an enhancement, it should be fine to say the rewrite valve should be used.
It is a generic solution that can take care of any matching scenario, but it
would be bad to add tiny
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Benjamin Plocek sm...@benjaminplocek.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Benjamin Plocek sm...@benjaminplocek.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net ---
This is probably a spec-clarification question, really: does * match a dot? Is
it greedy-matching? If it behaves like a Perl-compatible RE .* (or really any
RE .*),
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Plocek sm...@benjaminplocek.com ---
Ok, but then it would be great, to get any kind of a feedback when deploying
the application. When I use an invalid pattern like '/*.jsp' the server also
complains. But when I
17 matches
Mail list logo
