[VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Mark Thomas
The modules aren't really part of Tomcat 7. They should really be in a separate svn location. They'll also need tomove to a separate Bugzilla project. [ ] +1 Move them. [ ] 0 Move them, leave them. Don't mind. [ ] -1 Don't move them. I am happy to do the admin to make these moves happen. Mark

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/05/2010 13:25, Mark Thomas wrote: The modules aren't really part of Tomcat 7. They should really be in a separate svn location. They'll also need tomove to a separate Bugzilla project. [X] +1 Move them. [ ] 0 Move them, leave them. Don't mind. [ ] -1 Don't move them. Mark

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 05/19/2010 02:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: [X] +1 Move them. Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Henri Gomez
The modules aren't really part of Tomcat 7. They should really be in a separate svn location. They'll also need tomove to a separate Bugzilla project. tomcat-lite and bayeux have no dependencies on Tomcat but jdbc-pool depends on tomcat_juli isn't it ?

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/05/2010 13:36, Henri Gomez wrote: The modules aren't really part of Tomcat 7. They should really be in a separate svn location. They'll also need tomove to a separate Bugzilla project. tomcat-lite and bayeux have no dependencies on Tomcat but jdbc-pool depends on tomcat_juli isn't it

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread sebb
On 19/05/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: The modules aren't really part of Tomcat 7. They should really be in a separate svn location. They'll also need tomove to a separate Bugzilla project. [ ] +1 Move them. +1 (non-binding) [ ] 0 Move them, leave them. Don't mind. [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Henri Gomez
tomcat-lite and bayeux have no dependencies on Tomcat but jdbc-pool depends on tomcat_juli isn't it ? It does, although I don't see that as an obstacle to mving it outside the Tomact 7 source tree. Nope. +1 - To

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Costin Manolache
Not sure I understand the motivation for moving. If you must do it - could you wait few days ? I have quite a few changes, need to fix few tests. Almost done with the work project, will start having 20% time again this week. On the move - mostly -1, I don't like tree fragmentation. On May 19,

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/05/2010 16:33, Costin Manolache wrote: Not sure I understand the motivation for moving. The modules aren't part of Tomcat 7 yet they get included in tags etc. Note that jdbc-pool already has a separate tags directory. If you must do it - could you wait few days ? I have quite a few

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
What are the release plans for bayeux, jdbc-pool, tomcat-lite? Will they be separate components with their own lifecycle and versioning? Certainly jdbc-pool is mature and can be moved like that. Will we do the same for bayeux and tomcat-lite? IIRC there were thoughts to include tomcat-lite as an

Re: [VOTE] Move tomcat/trunk/modules to tomcat/modules

2010-05-19 Thread Costin Manolache
IMHO we should use the modules/ directory as a place to move stuff out of tomcat 'core', or develop stuff that is optional and only benefits a subset of users. They can be included in a tomcat-all or extra download if ready, but they should be released independently. Tags are pretty cheap - not