https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30450
--- Comment #2 from sey yseu...@daum.net 2011-12-21 08:04:49 UTC ---
It does not always occur.. very rarely.
We use 5.0.28.. I see this bug somedays ago.(In reply to comment #1)
I can't reproduce your error using 5.0.28.
--
Configure
Two cents from a side
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Sylvain Laurent
sylvain.laur...@m4x.org wrote:
On 20 déc. 2011, at 12:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
Where I disagree is on whether a switch to Maven lowers that barrier to
entry. I agree it lowers it for folks that already know Maven but don't
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30450
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2011-12-21
09:11:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
It does not always occur.. very rarely.
We use 5.0.28.. I see this bug somedays ago.(In reply to comment #1)
I can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173968#comment-13173968
]
Morten Haraldsen commented on MTOMCAT-110:
--
Hi again, I thought I should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173968#comment-13173968
]
Morten Haraldsen edited comment on MTOMCAT-110 at 12/21/11 9:27 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173968#comment-13173968
]
Morten Haraldsen edited comment on MTOMCAT-110 at 12/21/11 9:35 AM:
On 21/12/2011 07:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
This is Tomcat 3.3 (jakarta-tomcat-33.xml in Gump).
It is odd that this failed.
I suspect because the connectors are shared between 3.3.x, 4.1.x and
5.5.x and r1221282 removed the following method:
public void setHeaders(MimeHeaders headers)
I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174031#comment-13174031
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-110:
--
lovely :-)
But from where parameter
2011/12/21 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 21/12/2011 07:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
This is Tomcat 3.3 (jakarta-tomcat-33.xml in Gump).
It is odd that this failed.
I suspect because the connectors are shared between 3.3.x, 4.1.x and
5.5.x and r1221282 removed the following method:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174088#comment-13174088
]
Morten Haraldsen commented on MTOMCAT-110:
--
Yes, something like:
-logger slf4j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174088#comment-13174088
]
Morten Haraldsen edited comment on MTOMCAT-110 at 12/21/11 1:28 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173968#comment-13173968
]
Morten Haraldsen edited comment on MTOMCAT-110 at 12/21/11 1:29 PM:
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Dec 21 13:34:54 2011
New Revision: 1221719
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221719view=rev
Log:
[MTOMCAT-111] Make extract directory configurable
Modified:
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Dec 21 13:35:07 2011
New Revision: 1221720
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221720view=rev
Log:
document default value .extract
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat7-war-runner/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/maven/runner/Tomcat7RunnerCli.java
Modified:
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Dec 21 13:35:20 2011
New Revision: 1221721
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221721view=rev
Log:
fix test on hardcoded .extract as now it's a configurable value tru cli
Modified:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed MTOMCAT-111.
Resolution: Fixed
done.
please test with last SNAPSHOT.
Make extract directory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174092#comment-13174092
]
Hudson commented on MTOMCAT-111:
Integrated in TomcatMavenPlugin #76 (See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
Bug #: 52380
Summary: com.businessobjects.wp.om.OMReportElementContainer
(Error: INF)
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.20
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Dec 21 17:23:03 2011
New Revision: 1221816
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221816view=rev
Log:
[MTOMCAT-110] Support Slf4j bridge logger.
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat7-war-runner/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/maven/runner/Tomcat7Runner.java
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Dec 21 17:23:22 2011
New Revision: 1221817
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221817view=rev
Log:
feature to add extra resources in the exec war: log4j configuration files
Added:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed MTOMCAT-110.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Assignee: Olivier Lamy
committed.
please try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174238#comment-13174238
]
Hudson commented on MTOMCAT-110:
Integrated in TomcatMavenPlugin #77 (See
I'm just following up on this issue as I did not see any responses from the
community. Can anyone help out here?
(See attached file: JSF20EL.war)
Instructions for reproducing this issue are in the previous email attached
below.
Thanks for your time and help,
Regards,
Paul Nicolucci
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--
There hasn't been any activity on this thread for a little while.
I don't recall any significant arguments one way or the other for using
Nexus or scp+rsync.
Since Jean-Frederic has switched all the Maven artifact release scripts
to use Nexus, I intend to do the following:
- See what happens
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174289#comment-13174289
]
Brad Giaccio commented on MTOMCAT-108:
--
@Keith what Repository are you looking in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174300#comment-13174300
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MTOMCAT-108:
--
Author: markt
Date: Wed Dec 21 19:25:03 2011
New Revision: 1221841
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221841view=rev
Log:
Ignore a couple of plug-in config files
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/.gitignore
Modified: tomcat/trunk/.gitignore
URL:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Dec 21 19:25:43 2011
New Revision: 1221842
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221842view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52293
Correctly handle Context.antiResourceLocking when HOst.unpackWARs=false
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Dec 21 19:29:08 2011
New Revision: 1221845
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221845view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52293
Correctly handle the case when antiResourceLocking is enabled at the Context
level when unpackWARs is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52293
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-12-21 19:29:10 UTC ---
Fixed in trunk and will be included in 7.0.24 onwards.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
Author: markt
Date: Wed Dec 21 19:31:38 2011
New Revision: 1221846
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221846view=rev
Log:
Proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52293
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-12-21 19:31:43 UTC ---
Proposed for 6.0.x
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52365
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Hello,
I have started some stuff here: https://github.com/olamy/tomcat70.
* sources have been to appropriate modules.
* I'm now working on some test which fail (some tests need webapp examples)
* distro not yet done.
* repackaging of dbcp pool, commons-logging is done using shading technology
* I
Hi all,
I just discussed with Olivier about that.
I will help OSGiing Tomcat. I would like to enhance Pax Web to be able
to support both Jetty (as currently) and Tomcat using OSGi service selector.
I plan to push the OSGi changes tomorrow on the Olivier's github.
Regards
JB
On 12/21/2011
On 12/21/2011 09:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I have started some stuff here: https://github.com/olamy/tomcat70.
We must at least create 7.1.x branch for such a crucial change.
Otherwise no one will be able to apply custom patches to the exiting code base.
BTW, Oliver, it looks really
On 21/12/2011 21:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/21/2011 09:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I have started some stuff here: https://github.com/olamy/tomcat70.
We must at least create 7.1.x branch for such a crucial change.
I'm not sure we need a new branch if the end result is going to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174425#comment-13174425
]
Keith Corbin commented on MTOMCAT-108:
--
My bad, I was looking at the old repo
On 12/21/2011 10:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/12/2011 21:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/21/2011 09:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I have started some stuff here: https://github.com/olamy/tomcat70.
We must at least create 7.1.x branch for such a crucial change.
I'm not sure we need a
On 21/12/2011 21:57, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/21/2011 10:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/12/2011 21:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/21/2011 09:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I have started some stuff here: https://github.com/olamy/tomcat70.
We must at least create 7.1.x branch for such a
On 12/21/2011 11:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/12/2011 21:57, Mladen Turk wrote:
In essence no packages will be able to change the version
unless he rewrites the .spec or debian files from scratch thought.
Ouch. That is argument for only doing this in trunk, if we do it at all.
Right. Up
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52293
Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28037|1 |0
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52293
Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28034|1 |0
45 matches
Mail list logo
