[Bug 68677] no support for enviroment variables/request attributes

2024-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677 dub...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from

Buildbot failure in on tomcat-11.0.x

2024-02-26 Thread buildbot
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure) Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/954 Blamelist: remm Build Text: failed compile (failure) Status Detected: new failure Build Source Stamp: [branch main] 14eafaa620b900fc7d73f7a88035117ad5dd40f7

[Bug 68677] New: no support for enviroment variables/request attributes

2024-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677 Bug ID: 68677 Summary: no support for enviroment variables/request attributes Product: Tomcat Connectors Version: 1.2.49 Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal

Buildbot success in on tomcat-11.0.x

2024-02-26 Thread buildbot
Build status: Build succeeded! Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/955 Blamelist: remm Build Text: build successful Status Detected: restored build Build Source Stamp: [branch main] eb38a8416732f34a0fe7522a2012681d569e0fb0 Steps:

(tomcat) branch main updated: Remove old javadoc

2024-02-26 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 14eafaa620 Remove old javadoc 14eafaa620 is described

(tomcat) branch 10.1.x updated: Remove old javadoc

2024-02-26 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push: new 3d665c04d3 Remove old javadoc 3d665c04d3 is

(tomcat) branch 9.0.x updated: Remove old javadoc

2024-02-26 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new ce631eebd7 Remove old javadoc ce631eebd7 is

(tomcat) branch main updated: Explain the Java 22 check

2024-02-26 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new eb38a84167 Explain the Java 22 check eb38a84167 is

(tomcat) branch 8.5.x updated: Remove old javadoc

2024-02-26 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new 4e288be9c9 Remove old javadoc 4e288be9c9 is

(tomcat) branch 9.0.x updated: Explain the Java 22 check

2024-02-26 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new a3255b5e93 Explain the Java 22 check a3255b5e93 is

(tomcat) branch 10.1.x updated: Explain the Java 22 check

2024-02-26 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push: new ed83bb9fbf Explain the Java 22 check ed83bb9fbf

Re: FFM in Tomcat 10.1

2024-02-26 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi all, > > Sounds very good overall but would be great to not do it at the cost to > break tomcat IDE support maybe - current status since it uses a single > module and not all IDE support to compile supackages with different target >

Re: FFM in Tomcat 10.1

2024-02-26 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le lun. 26 févr. 2024 à 13:16, Rémy Maucherat a écrit : > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Sounds very good overall but would be great to not do it at the cost to > > break tomcat IDE support maybe - current status since it uses a single > >

[PR] Remove duplicate cipher element from unimplemented set in TesterOpenSSL.java [tomcat]

2024-02-26 Thread via GitHub
dsoumis opened a new pull request, #699: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/699 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe,

svn commit: r67585 - /release/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/

2024-02-26 Thread schultz
Author: schultz Date: Mon Feb 26 13:14:12 2024 New Revision: 67585 Log: Remove old releae artifacts. Removed: release/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional

Re: JDK 22 Release Candidates & Virtual Threads pinning heads-up

2024-02-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, On 2/20/24 03:05, David Delabassee wrote: Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update! The first JDK 22 Release Candidates builds are now available [1]. At this stage, only P1 issues will still be evaluated. And with the JDK 22 General Availability set for March 19th, it is

svn commit: r67586 - /release/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.18/

2024-02-26 Thread schultz
Author: schultz Date: Mon Feb 26 13:14:51 2024 New Revision: 67586 Log: Remove old release artifacts. Removed: release/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.18/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional

Re: Tomcat 8.5.99 artifacts not in Maven central

2024-02-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 2/22/24 15:11, Mark Thomas wrote: On 22/02/2024 20:03, S. Ali Tokmen wrote: Dear Tomcat development team The Tomcat 8.5.99 artifacts not in Maven central. Is this normal? No. I've just checked and they weren't promoted from the staging repository. I've just done that. They

Re: [PR] Remove duplicate cipher element from unimplemented set in TesterOpenSSL.java [tomcat]

2024-02-26 Thread via GitHub
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #699: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/699#issuecomment-1964139328 @markt-asf Any chance this was a copy/paste error that should be corrected in a different way (e.g. there is actually a missing cipher)? -- This is an automated message from

Re: FFM in Tomcat 10.1

2024-02-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
Rémy, On 2/23/24 08:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I would like to propose backporting the OpenSSL FFM support to Tomcat 10.1. Java 22.0.0 should be released on March 19, and the next Java LTS should still have no problem targeting Java 11. As a result, there should be no negative impact to

Re: [PR] Remove duplicate cipher element from unimplemented set in TesterOpenSSL.java [tomcat]

2024-02-26 Thread via GitHub
markt-asf commented on PR #699: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/699#issuecomment-1964191235 @ChristopherSchultz I don't think so. We'd see test failures if that were the case. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[PR] Attempt to protect against asynchronous thread safety violations [tomcat]

2024-02-26 Thread via GitHub
markt-asf opened a new pull request, #700: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700 Providing this as a PR as it isn't strictly a Tomcat bug or Tomcat's problem to solve. That said, we do see some asynchronous bug reports and this might help highlight application issues early and

Re: [PR] Attempt to protect against asynchronous thread safety violations [tomcat]

2024-02-26 Thread via GitHub
rmaucher commented on PR #700: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700#issuecomment-1964127701 Anywhere else can also be similarly synced, then. I don't think it is a good idea to insert random thread safety safeguards in addition to what the specification mandates. Time for a

Re: [PR] Attempt to protect against asynchronous thread safety violations [tomcat]

2024-02-26 Thread via GitHub
markt-asf commented on PR #700: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700#issuecomment-1964174647 Fair point. The complicating factor is that there are so many entry points that a non-container thread could use. A complete solution would need to, effectively, wrap the

Re: [PR] Attempt to protect against asynchronous thread safety violations [tomcat]

2024-02-26 Thread via GitHub
rmaucher commented on PR #700: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/700#issuecomment-1964203702 I feel ok with this sort of thread safety additions [there could be a lot !] if they have a system property to enable them. Then it becomes useful as a way to detect problems, although I

Re: FFM in Tomcat 10.1

2024-02-26 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 2:25 PM Christopher Schultz wrote: > > Rémy, > > On 2/23/24 08:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose backporting the OpenSSL FFM support to Tomcat 10.1. > > > > Java 22.0.0 should be released on March 19, and the next Java LTS > > should still