DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43687] New: - after repeated authentication tomcat again sends page with login form instead of protected static resource

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43687] - after repeated authentication tomcat again sends page with login form instead of protected static resource

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43687] - after repeated authentication tomcat again sends page with login form instead of protected static resource

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Delays in mod_jk

2007-10-24 Thread Larry Reisler
We are running JBOSS 4.21GA(Tomcat 6.0.10) with mod_jk 1.25 on Apache 2.2.x, and have run into something of a performance issue. We have the system setup so that threads on mod_jk and tomcat timeout after 10 minutes (an heuristic which has been discussed in some of the documentation) using

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43690] New: - SSL Problem

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43690] - SSL Problem

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Catalina Ant JMX?

2007-10-24 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Paul, please open a bug! Peter Am 23.10.2007 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Shemansky: While browsing the project, I noticed that there is an unused separation of Catalina Ant JMX resources. If this was unintended, a possible cleanup patch is attached. tomcat-unused-property-patch.txt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43692] New: - Catalina Ant JMX is currently unused, and seems unnecessary.

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43692. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43692] - Catalina Ant JMX is currently unused, and seems unnecessary.

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43692. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r588000 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-24 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 24 13:10:18 2007 New Revision: 588000 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588000view=rev Log: added in proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38131] - WatchedResource does not work if app is outside webapps

2007-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38131. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: svn commit: r588000 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-24 Thread Lucas Galfaso
Hi all, I do not know what each of you actually thinks about this bug, but I would hardly consider this a must have, nor a show stopper (thing that I thought was the case for the next tomcat 6.0.x tag.) If every known bug with a patch is been considered, then I would like to propose

Re: svn commit: r588000 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-24 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 20:39 -0300, Lucas Galfaso wrote: Hi all, I do not know what each of you actually thinks about this bug, but I would hardly consider this a must have, nor a show stopper (thing that I thought was the case for the next tomcat 6.0.x tag.) I feel a bit like you. I was