DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40316.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40316.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42347.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:29:43 2008
New Revision: 609751
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609751view=rev
Log:
Comment reformatting.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.h
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.h
URL:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:36:53 2008
New Revision: 609756
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609756view=rev
Log:
We already sync (jk_lb_pull) retries from shm to
the lb worker before, so no need to use the shm here.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:41:44 2008
New Revision: 609757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609757view=rev
Log:
Remove retries element from service struct, because
we don't use it.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:51:15 2008
New Revision: 609760
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609760view=rev
Log:
Refactor retries, remove from service and jk_worker,
move into ajp worker instead, because we don't actually
use it in the other jk workers.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42347.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:41:44 2008
New Revision: 609757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609757view=rev
Log:
Remove retries element from service struct, because
we don't use it.
I don't get it.
This copy was intentionally made so we can pass the
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jan 7 13:11:26 2008
New Revision: 609778
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609778view=rev
Log:
minor fixes
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/ThroughputInterceptor.java
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jan 7 13:25:23 2008
New Revision: 609784
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609784view=rev
Log:
start the cluster JMX impl
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/jmx/
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/jmx/ClusterJmxHelper.java
Modified:
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jan 7 13:52:49 2008
New Revision: 609790
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609790view=rev
Log:
reformat, no change, so that the upcoming changes and corrections of mbean
files can be easily read
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 7 15:15:59 2008
New Revision: 609803
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609803view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 43743. Correctly handle nest tag files packaged in a jar.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Parser.java
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 7 15:28:48 2008
New Revision: 609805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609805view=rev
Log:
Propose fix for 43743.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43742.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:41:44 2008
New Revision: 609757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609757view=rev
Log:
Remove retries element from service struct, because
we don't use it.
I don't get it.
This copy was intentionally made so
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43741.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Jan 7 16:04:46 2008
New Revision: 609813
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609813view=rev
Log:
votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43636.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Rainer Jung wrote:
Does that make sense for you?
Yes it does. The most important is that if
there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied
from lb worker.
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Does that make sense for you?
Yes it does. The most important is that if
there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied
from lb worker.
In fact we don't copy (this is not new), because the retries for an lb
has a different functional meaning
25 matches
Mail list logo