On 3/15/2012 6:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/03/2012 17:42, Filip Hanik Mailing Lists wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/reports/servers/
Attached is a patch that leverages the Tomcat WebSocket API with
minimalistic changes and uses that to implement WebSockets in Tomcat
6.0.x
On 3/14/2012 8:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/03/2012 10:15, Johno Crawford wrote:
On 8/03/2012 9:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/03/2012 09:12, Johno Crawford wrote:
What's next / left on the TODO list Mark? Anything I can help out with?
Porting the generic HTTP upgrade followed by the
On 3/2/2012 2:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
You can't register on a selector using another thread.
Bingo. That explains it. Is that documented anywhere?
I'm not sure if the java.nio documentation says it, I think it does. The Selector object is not thread safe. trying to manipulate
interestops and
On 3/1/2012 5:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/03/2012 11:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2012 21:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2012 18:53, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/28/2012 11:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
You may also be able to help with some problems I am having getting
non
I have a draft patch [1] that seems to fix this. A similar change would
be required for the Comet part of Poller.processKey()
Thoughts and/or comments? Not knowing the NIO code very well, there
might be a better way to achieve the same result that I haven't seen.
Mark
[1]
Mark, what buffer size are you referring to increase for the web socket tests
to all pass?
Filip
On 3/1/2012 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/03/2012 15:03, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I have a draft patch [1] that seems to fix this. A similar change would
be required for the Comet part
I see, MessageInbound has hard coded receive buffers. Got it
Filip
On 3/1/2012 10:13 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark, what buffer size are you referring to increase for the web socket tests
to all pass?
Filip
On 3/1/2012 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/03/2012 15:03, Filip Hanik
On 2/28/2012 11:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
You may also be able to help with some problems I am having getting
non-blocking behaviour between messages with NIO. I'm not 100% clear
what is happening yet, but I think it is something like:
- HTTP GET (with upgrade request
On 3/1/2012 11:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/03/2012 18:27, fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Mar 1 18:27:56 2012
New Revision: 1295724
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295724view=rev
Log:
Allow the examples to configure the buffer on the fly
Guess you beat me to it.
/1/2012 11:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/03/2012 18:01, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Alright, now that I'm all squared away with Autobahn and test cases
running. Is there a specific unit test you have to produce this behavior?
That would help me for digging through it.
Assuming you are running
Thanks for that John, I'll fix that too.
Filip
On 3/1/2012 4:42 PM, Johno Crawford wrote:
On 2/03/2012 12:05 AM, fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Mar 1 23:05:51 2012
New Revision: 1295978
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295978view=rev
Log:
Fix WebSocket's non
[+1] Released
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 2/28/2012 11:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2012 16:58, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/28/2012 4:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
WebSocket is working with good performance and passing all Autobahn
tests on BIO, NIO and APR.
Currently, all three connectors using blocking IO throughout so
On 2/16/2012 2:12 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Do not send attachments to this mailing list ever!
The world could implode!!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 2/17/2012 8:55 AM, Francis Galiegue wrote:
While AccessLogValve is the subject...
Any chance we can do away with the default, unparseable timestamp
format? With Apache, it is allowed to specify the timestamp using
strftime(3)-like format, I'd like to be able to do the same with
Tomcat's
/01/2012 22:04, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm looking for a better reason for this change. What was the reasoning
behind this limitation, as it breaks years of compatibility.
Workaround is to point docBase to a directory.
The reasoning was that the documentation said one thing (that WARs
I'm looking for a better reason for this change. What was the reasoning behind
this limitation, as it breaks years of compatibility.
Workaround is to point docBase to a directory.
best
Filip
On 3/11/2011 11:40 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Mar 11 18:40:13 2011
New
No grudge held :)
I'm just bringing it up since very many files have been reformatted for the sake of formatting. And when tracing down a problem, I, and I
suspect others too, often use SVN history to figure out what and how changed. So a formatting change that makes satisfies a personal
On 12/2/2011 10:11 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/12/2 Christopher Schultzch...@christopherschultz.net:
All,
This may be a waste of time, but it's worth suggesting IMO.
We have lots of users who try to upgrade between major versions of
Tomcat by simply installing the new Tomcat somewhere,
On 9/7/2011 11:48 AM, Anand, Amit (Contractor) wrote:
All,
Kinda new to tomcat but have a couple quick questions which came up regarding
CVE-2011-3109 (Bug 51698).
Questions:
Any timeline to when stable release of 6.0.34 is supposed to be released?
Just follow this list. That's the best
Thank you!
On 8/26/2011 7:31 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/8/25 Konstantin Kolinkoknst.koli...@gmail.com:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1157874view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51583
1) I think that because of this change the while (con != null)
+1
On 8/25/2011 8:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Subject says it all.
Here is my +1 to start this off.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 8/15/2011 6:34 AM, Ҷï wrote:
/**
* Server socket acceptor thread.
*/
protected class Acceptor implements Runnable {
/**
* The background thread that listens for incoming TCP/IP connections
and
* hands them off to an appropriate processor.
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.19 Stable
On 7/14/2011 3:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.19 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.19/
The svn tag is:
On 7/10/2011 6:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Filip,
On 07.07.2011 23:40, fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:40:05 2011
New Revision: 1144061
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1144061view=rev
Log:
Include jdbc-pool into tomcat release.
Added:
feel free to commit the fix
On 7/10/2011 2:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I tested the jdbc-pool building, which is part of the release right now.
The manifest contains patterns of the form @@VERSION@@, e.g.
org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool;version=@@VERSION@@;
go ahead add it in, if you add in a flag to toggle the behavior, and the flag is defaulted to today's behavior. you're safe, and you give
users an option
Filip
On 7/10/2011 1:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I implemented an addition to DeltaManager which allows to filter which
session attributes
On 7/7/2011 5:55 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/7/8fha...@apache.org:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:40:05 2011
New Revision: 1144061
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1144061view=rev
Log:
Include jdbc-pool into tomcat release.
Added:
tomcat/trunk/res/maven/tomcat-jdbc.pom
1)
On 6/20/2011 8:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/20/2011 03:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 20.06.2011 15:41, Mladen Turk wrote:
In general all commands except those that start a Tomcat (and thus
deploy webapps etc.) should not use that type of params. They should go
into CATALINA_OPTS. Everything
I'd like to suggest that we include tomcat-jdbc.jar in the 7.0.15 release.
DBCP will still be the default, but allows users to configure an alternative
fairly easily without downloading separate libraries.
It's easy to include in the build process, the jar is very small, so it doesn't
bloat
On 6/3/2011 10:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/06/2011 17:07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd like to suggest that we include tomcat-jdbc.jar in the 7.0.15 release.
DBCP will still be the default, but allows users to configure an
alternative fairly easily without downloading separate
hi Philippe, open a bugzilla item
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Tomcat%20Modules
Add your patch there, and I will happily take a look
thanks for contributing
Filip
On 5/24/2011 8:31 AM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
Hello,
I have implemented for Ofbiz a port of DBCP Local
+1 sounds good
Filip
On 5/18/2011 7:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases.
Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync
(every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a commit
hook would
-1 for this change. 0 means infinite (no timeout)
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/Socket.html#setSoTimeout%28int%29
Filip
On 5/16/2011 1:31 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon May 16 07:31:23 2011
New Revision: 1103633
URL:
(readTimeout,TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+}
Filip
On 5/16/2011 3:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/05/2011 16:24, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
-1 for this change. 0 means infinite (no timeout)
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/Socket.html#setSoTimeout%28int%29
The problem
on most OS:es there is a single lock for accepting new connections, so a better
default is 1 for acceptor thread count.
there is no performance gain in multiple threads, none that I was ever able to
detect.
Filip
On 5/12/2011 2:32 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
On 5/9/2011 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
fan-tastic! Thank you!
On 5/5/2011 9:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/05/2011 16:17, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Here is what I propose, and you'll see that it's pretty much inline with
what you suggest.
a) add in a flag that lets keep alive be turned off during concurrency
+1
Filip
On 5/5/2011 10:00 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All open bugs (apart from 49683 which should probably be re-classed as
an enhancement) have been fixed in trunk, the BIO changes have been
applied and recent enhancement requests (with patches) have been applied.
I am about to start the
On 5/3/2011 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Summary
---
While trying to align the documentation for maxConnections with the
actual implementation a couple of performance issue have been identified
with the BIO connector. All bar one of these have been fixed. A fix
needs to be agreed for
On 5/4/2011 9:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/05/2011 16:17, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 5/3/2011 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
In a similar fashion, we can also craft a test run that will yield a
substantial improvement over the old implementation in throughput.
So there is a test case
On 5/3/2011 10:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2011 20:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/04/2011 22:51, Tim Whittington wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/04/2011 10:50, Tim Whittington wrote:
Is what's actually going on more like:
APR: use
On 4/21/2011 8:00 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/04/2011 16:27, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 4/18/2011 4:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/04/2011 10:13, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:25 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Apr 16 22:25:28 2011
New
On 4/21/2011 3:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/04/2011 21:00, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Here are some thoughts on the implementation
Thanks for the feedback.
1. |com.sun.security.jgss.initiate is not needed
This definition is not needed in jaas.conf. Tomcat is not a client in
this case
On 4/21/2011 1:02 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
+int firstReadTimeout;
+if (queueTime= standardTimeout) {
+// Queued for longer than timeout but there might be
+// data so use shortest possible timeout
+
On 4/20/2011 10:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The new code is better than the old. You are welcome to try and improve
it further although I don't think there is much more scope for
improvement given the performance figures I am seeing.
My suggestion here would be to:
1. When a JAR file has been
Here are some thoughts on the implementation
1. |com.sun.security.jgss.initiate is not needed
This definition is not needed in jaas.conf. Tomcat is not a client in this
case, it's a server accepting tickets.
the .initiate is only for clients that request a Kerberos ticket from the KDC.
The
On 4/18/2011 4:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/04/2011 10:13, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:25 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Apr 16 22:25:28 2011
New Revision: 1094069
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1094069view=rev
Log:
Fix
On 4/7/2011 7:14 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/4/8 Filip Hanik - Dev Listsdevli...@hanik.com:
On 3/29/2011 2:05 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
+ * @param certs The gssContext processed by the {@link
Authenticator}.
+ */
+public Principal authenticate(GSSContext gssContext);
+
+
On 4/8/2011 2:50 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
The input buffer is 8k by default (max header size), so this could be
significant with a large maxConnections.
significant in 1990 maybe :) even with 20k connections, this be a drop in the
ocean compared to memory usage for today's applications
On 4/6/2011 3:51 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
b) Check the input buffer at the end of the loop in
Http11Processor#process() and process the next request if there is any
data in the input buffer.
- No Increase in memory requirements.
- Fixes issue 3
- Pipelined requests will get
On 3/29/2011 2:05 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
+ * @param certs The gssContext processed by the {@link Authenticator}.
+ */
+public Principal authenticate(GSSContext gssContext);
+
+
we can continue to add methods and changing the interface, or we can do what
most other systems do
yes
On 4/7/2011 1:32 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
While reading the code for jasper.compiler.Compiler on an unrelated
errand, I noticed that the removeGeneratedFiles and
removeGeneratedClassFiles methods contain this code:
} catch (Exception e) {
// Remove as much
Canceled. Not enough votes.
Filip
On 3/3/2011 12:24 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Source and Binary Packages
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.1.0.1/
Tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tags/JDBC_POOL_1_1_0_1/
Documentation
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool
namingResources.cleanupNoClose
couldn't you implement a closeMethod=close in theResource element, that
way the name of the method is configurable.
Filip
On 3/8/2011 3:15 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Mar 8 22:15:34 2011
New Revision: 1079575
URL:
On 3/10/2011 6:57 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Verified... This seems enough, imo, to warrant a Broken...
not sure how this is broken :)
The connection has been cancelled ie, removed for being abandoned. So you should not be able to use it anymore. There is a question if
this should return a SQL
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3507
Filip
On 3/10/2011 5:12 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/3/3 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
On 02/03/2011 20:57, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I wanted to throw out an idea of an alternative or complementary way to
handle our STATUS.txt files
On 3/9/2011 11:57 PM, Eiji Takahashi wrote:
Hi developers.
I encountered the same issue, too.
I got following exception.
an exception is expected if the connection has been abandoned.
it's tricky, one can always throw a SQLException, which leads to a problem, what if a method is called that
On 03/05/2011 09:49 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
And what about jdbc pool on Maven Central ?
I want to, but it needs to pass a release first
Filip
2011/3/4 Filip Hanik - Dev Listsdevli...@hanik.com:
Where do we stand with publishing Tomcat jars/artifacts to a Maven
repository.
I see that
ping! jdbc-pool needs a bit vote tlc
On 03/03/2011 12:24 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Source and Binary Packages
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.1.0.1/
Tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tags/JDBC_POOL_1_1_0_1/
Documentation
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc
On 3/5/2011 5:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/03/2011 23:46, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Not in here
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/tomcat/catalina/
what am I missing?
Couple of things.
The artifact IDs were changed for Tomcat 7 so you need to look here:
http
On 3/5/2011 7:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.10 Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 03/04/2011 01:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/03/2011 00:33, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Got it. It doesn't seem to be published to
https://repository.apache.org/ nor to ibiblio
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/tomcat/catalina/
Does it mean we're
On 03/04/2011 12:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/03/2011 17:56, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 03/04/2011 01:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/03/2011 00:33, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Got it. It doesn't seem to be published to
https://repository.apache.org/ nor
Thanks, I will get this taken care of, and reroll.
Filip
On 3/2/2011 8:21 PM, sebb wrote:
On 2 March 2011 22:09, Filip Hanik - Dev Listsdevli...@hanik.com wrote:
Source and Binary Packages
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.1.0.0/
tomcat-juli.jar has NOTICE and LICENSE files, but
I'll cancel this vote, get all the NOTICE and LICENSE files correct, as well as
the tag matching the jars.
best
Filip
On 3/2/2011 3:09 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Source and Binary Packages
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.1.0.0/
Tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat
Source and Binary Packages
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.1.0.1/
Tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tags/JDBC_POOL_1_1_0_1/
Documentation
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/jdbc-pool.html
The proposed 1.1.0.1 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha -
Where do we stand with publishing Tomcat jars/artifacts to a Maven repository.
I see that the mvn-pub.xml has been updated, but I don't see where the source
JARs are generated from.
best
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 3/3/2011 1:25 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/3/3fha...@apache.org:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Mar 3 19:20:38 2011
New Revision: 1076736
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1076736view=rev
Log:
Add missing files and license header
Add NOTICE/LICENSE to all JAR files
Added:
On 3/3/2011 5:25 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/3/4 Filip Hanik - Dev Listsdevli...@hanik.com:
Where do we stand with publishing Tomcat jars/artifacts to a Maven
repository.
I see that the mvn-pub.xml has been updated, but I don't see where the
source JARs are generated from.
Are you
I wanted to throw out an idea of an alternative or complementary way to handle our STATUS.txt files, and this solution can apply to our CTR
branches as well.
The solution would be http://www.reviewboard.org/
If there is an interest, I can spend some time configuring an instance for one of our
On 3/2/2011 2:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 02/03/2011 20:57, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I wanted to throw out an idea of an alternative or complementary way to
handle our STATUS.txt files, and this solution can apply to our CTR
branches as well.
The solution would be http
Source and Binary Packages
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.1.0.0/
Tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tags/JDBC_POOL_1_1_0_0/
Documentation
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/jdbc-pool.html
The proposed 1.1.0.0 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha -
On 2/28/2011 5:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/03/2011 00:16, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/28/2011 4:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It isn't clear to me if you are voting -1
on the above commit, and the following commits. r1074675
Understood and agree those commits are broken. I'll get
On 2/27/2011 4:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/02/2011 20:16, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The simplest solution is, would be to use an individual selector.
Register the socket and issue a select() on the thread you are running on.
If you want to use a shared selector (like NIO does for reads
[X] Broken - do not release
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1074675view=rev
Are not completely correct implementations as they don't
- support a timeout correctly
- dont account for when a write is needed on the selector
- they potentially
a trust store, then this
valve, must make sure that the validation actually has taken place.
Filip
On 2/28/2011 11:06 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/27/2011 4:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/02/2011 20:16, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The simplest solution is, would be to use
On 2/28/2011 11:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2011 18:11, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
[X] Broken - do not release
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1074675view=rev
Are not completely correct implementations as they don't
- support
On 2/28/2011 12:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2011 18:45, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/28/2011 11:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/02/2011 18:11, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
[X] Broken - do not release
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1075030view=rev
http://svn.apache.org
be backed out. The solution is quite simple,
and it does not involve modifying the connectors.
[1]
setNeedClientAuth(true);
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/javax/net/ssl/SSLEngine.html#setNeedClientAuth(boolean)
best
Filip
On 2/25/2011 1:16 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This looks
On 2/28/2011 4:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It isn't clear to me if you are voting -1
on the above commit, and the following commits. r1074675
If you wish to do this, it should at least include:
1. input filters need to check if they retrieved the entire body
if only partial, why even attempt a
This looks like a CPU spinning handshake to me.
The operation handshake(true, true); returns an IO interest to be
registered with a selector.
If the client is slow here or misbehaving, you could end up in a end
less loop, and hence we can have introduced a very simple DoS
vulnerability here.
Wouldn't you build this into the logging framework, instead of one
specific component?
best
Filip
On 02/21/2011 08:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The ASF Sonar installation managed to generate 46GB of identical log
messages [1] today in the 8 hours it took to notice it was down.
While better
On 02/22/2011 12:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/02/2011 19:34, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Wouldn't you build this into the logging framework, instead of one
specific component?
You could, if you can find an efficient way to spot duplicate log
messages and then differentiate
On 02/17/2011 11:50 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
-build.properties
-includes
-output
done
thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
I will fix it. Reattempt is managed in the channel itself at a much lower level. That has always been the case. Adding reattempt here is
ambiguous, so I will readjust the interface to return void.
best
Filip
On 2/10/2011 3:36 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/2/9fha...@apache.org:
Author:
On 2/10/2011 6:04 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Servlet 3 standardizes file uploads. It contains the ability to limit on request size, pretty much the same as commons fileupload
supported for many years.
It seems when this conditions triggers the rest of the request inout stream is still drained at
I'm glad you commented, there should be no looping at all. It was a left over
from a previous proposal
fixed in r1068996
Filip
On 2/9/2011 2:35 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Wed Feb 9 09:35:16 2011
New Revision: 1068808
URL:
On 02/02/2011 12:37 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
[X] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 01/22/2011 11:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
hmm, it should probably throw the commented out channel exception
instead of simply bailing out with the flag set.
After all the timeout has not been reached, so the caller should not be
tricked into thinking that it has, since no one ever checks the
interrupted flag
Filip
On 01/26/2011
I'd opt for the default value to be true. I rather have usability than
spec compliance.
that's exactly what the STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE flag does, it opts for
usability,performance etc rather than spec compliance, and the default
value I believe is false on that flag.
Filip
On 01/21/2011
+1
On 1/20/2011 9:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The memory leak in the Tomcat 7 NIO connector [1] got back-ported to
6.0.x and included in 6.0.30. [2]
I have proposed the fix for 6.0.x. Given the severity I think we need to
approve the backport and start a 6.0.31 release asap.
Mark
[1]
On 1/20/2011 11:45 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jan 20 18:45:09 2011
New Revision: 1061451
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1061451view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
I'd prefer to stay CTR for a while. Chances are there are still much to be
fixed given all the changes that have taken place.
Filip
On 1/18/2011 11:41 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
Since Tomcat 7.0.x went stable, does that change the commit policy, or
are we still doing
can't you just create a directory, drop your jars in there, and in
conf/catalina.properties, configure the shared.loader property?
best
Filip
On 1/13/2011 9:05 AM, Juraj Burian wrote:
Hello folks,
I would like introduce new very simple extension of Tomcat.
In my opinion, many people must
roger that Rainer, thank you!
On 1/10/2011 1:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Filip,
On 10.01.2011 17:41, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50333
Filip Hanikfha...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
+1
Filip
On 1/4/2011 3:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this point?
Cheers,
Mark
-
On 1/4/2011 9:22 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I just see a new tag for jdbc-pool.
I'll be very happy to have such advanced pool on Tomcat but we need
some stable release (and of course artifact deployed to Maven
central).
So what's the status for it, and possible inclusion (as extra) in Tomcat 6.0.x
On 1/4/2011 12:27 PM, sebb wrote:
On 4 January 2011 18:37,fha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Jan 4 18:37:44 2011
New Revision: 1055137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1055137view=rev
Log:
No need to instantiate a new driver instance each time, simply reuse the one we
1 - 100 of 1185 matches
Mail list logo
