https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
Kevin Hale Boyes kcbo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcbo...@gmail.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Hale Boyes kcbo...@gmail.com ---
I've played around with basic.jspx from the examples webapp.
If you recall, it sets the content-type to be application/xhtml+xml.
When I add a script tag with an empty body the output
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Hale Boyes kcbo...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 33019
-- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33019action=edit
Patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Kevin,
On 8/17/15 5:27 PM, Kevin Hale Boyes wrote:
On 6 July 2015 at 14:15, bugzi...@apache.org
mailto:bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org mailto:ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 17 August 2015 at 15:43, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
If you want to propose this patch, please attach it to the BZ issue
directly, rather than replying to the message on the dev list.
Do I need to re-open the bug?
Kevin,
On 8/17/15 5:48 PM, Kevin Hale Boyes wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 15:43, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
If you want to propose this patch, please attach it to the BZ issue
directly, rather than replying to the message on the dev list.
Do I need to
On 6 July 2015 at 14:15, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
--- Comment #5 from jones...@oildex.com ---
Thanks for the input.
Regarding Content-Type: Jasper sets the content type in the generated source
file by itself, i.e:
response.setContentType(text/xml;charset=UTF-8);
I havent been able to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net ---
(In reply to jonesgav from comment #5)
We have also similar found issues with a self-closing form tag.
I'm pretty sure a form with no child elements is not legal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net ---
I'm not sure this is a Tomcat issue, but I'm not sure exactly how Tomcat does
its XML parsing, etc. I know that I've seen this problem with other
XML-oriented
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
--- Comment #2 from jones...@oildex.com ---
TAGX and JSPX only. Standard JSPs Tags don't seem to exhibit this.
Interestingly, JSP *Documents* having an extension of just jsp (rather than
jspx) don't seem to either.
Generated JSP(X)/Tag(X) =
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58095
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net ---
Do you have a test case? Is this .jspx or .jsp?
What does generated jsp mean?
Recommendation for suppressing the coalescing of the tags:
script type=text/javascript
13 matches
Mail list logo
