Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-12-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Rainer Jung wrote: Mark Thomas schrieb: According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Any more votes for 4.1.39? We still need another +1 to do the release. Mark - To

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-12-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Mark Thomas schrieb: According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-25 Thread Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Mark

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Mark Thomas schrieb: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: I meant where to find the tag directory for the release 4.1.39. It is in your inbox. Look at the svn commit messages. Which all seem to be against trunk, i.e. not a tag. I meant the

[VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Cheers, Mark - To

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [X] Broken The sigs and hashes don't agree with their targets, except

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [X] Broken

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [X] Broken The sigs and hashes don't agree with their

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had network troubles during the upload and I had to retry several times. I thought it completed without error but it looks like apache-tomcat-4.1.39-LE-jdk14.exe got corrupted during the upload. The MD5 and sig is correct.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: Sorry, just discovered the problem. The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243. I'll know next time... Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have to use hexadecimal format and prefix the id with 0x (note zero, not the letter

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: Sorry, just discovered the problem. The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243. I'll know next time... Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have to use

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had network troubles during the upload and I had to retry several times. I thought it completed without error but it looks like apache-tomcat-4.1.39-LE-jdk14.exe got

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ I just ran RAT on the source archive. There are a lot of source files that

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ I just ran RAT on the source archive. There are a lot of

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: However, there are several binary files that are different: connectors/jni/native/os/win32/logmessages.bin connectors/procrun/bin.../tomcat*.exe This suggests a packaging error - perhaps these bin files were incorrectly formatted to correct the line-endings? Looks like. I'll

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: However, there are several binary files that are different: connectors/jni/native/os/win32/logmessages.bin connectors/procrun/bin.../tomcat*.exe This suggests a packaging error - perhaps these bin files were

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are available here:

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tarball and other packages are

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 19/11/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19/11/2008,