What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released?
If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/?
Martin
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 13:22 -0400, Martin Dubuc wrote:
What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released?
If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/?
Martin Dubuc wrote:
What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released?
that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be
released.
If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
On 02/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote:
Martin Dubuc wrote:
What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially
released?
that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be
released.
I've not seen the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail ?
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Ok, so with one exception, all voted stable,
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 17:02 +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
of the tgz sources archive.
Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
archive are
2009/5/24 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] Stable
I do
2009/5/24 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
On 25/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/24 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] Stable
I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
of
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
-
To
Just clarification: The tgz is broken. Assuming that is fixed,
I see no problems and the actual *codebase* is
[X] Stable
On May 20, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] Broken
On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote:
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Rémy
Observations
-src.tar.gz - hashes match, key in WOT (more sigs would be
On 22.05.2009 15:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
2. i18n resources are still corrupted. There is a patch already in the
STATUS file to fix this. Was an issue in 6.0.18 so this is a bug that
has not been fixed rather than a regression.
But only for the tarball source distribution, right? I checked some
On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Looks OK :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Rémy
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.
All jars should ideally have NL files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.
The EXE fails to install the following file:
RELEASE-NOTES
It also fails to install RUNNING.txt
[X] Stable
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Rémy
On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Please stay tuned, I can test and vote tomorrow.
Thanks
[X] Broken
On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote:
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.
All jars should ideally have NL files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.
The EXE fails to install the following
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Rémy
The tgz archive of the sources is broken.
Some of
22 matches
Mail list logo
