Re: [jira] [Updated] (TOMEE-662) Support aliases on resources

2013-04-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi guys shouldn't we remove the version = trunk? it doesn't mean anything and doesn't help to identify when it was fixed. wdyt? *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn:

Re: [jira] [Updated] (TOMEE-662) Support aliases on resources

2013-04-14 Thread David Blevins
Wanted to bring it up for discussion before we announce it to the world. Didn't notice it until reviewing the notes. Good concept, but the term alias isn't accurate and overlaps awkwardly with the existing provider concept. Also seems like there's some sort of multiple inheritance thing

Re: [jira] [Updated] (TOMEE-662) Support aliases on resources

2013-04-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
About aliases: just a way to bind the exact same resource to multiple name, not the same stuff as providers - you bind the same reference About my mail: was just about trunk version in jira, not this particular jira Le 15 avr. 2013 05:00, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : Wanted