Re: Examples Missing README Files

Hi, Thank you. I don't have the permission to update the assignee, so I ask a JIRA admin to assign ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2393 to me (username: Bogdan Stirbat). Thanks, Bogdan În lun., 11 feb. 2019 la 17:12, César Hernández Mendoza < cesargu...@gmail.com> a scris:

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Then just upgrade? About the "not needed", it depends but not an issue by itself AFAIK. Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 17:37, Ivan Junckes Filho a écrit : > This is how it is showing up in components, schemas. But with a lot of not > needed properties as this class has only telefone, mensagem and

Re: MicroProfile Integration in Plus and Plume

Great! Thanks for the update. Send the PR when ready and I’ll be happy to test it and merge it! Cheers, Roberto > On 11 Feb 2019, at 14:16, j4fm wrote: > > Hey Roberto, progress so far... the JAX-RS issue you referenced a few > messages ago was solved with my filter enhancement. But

Re: My experience trying to find TCK failing test so far

I opened this PR https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/pull/9 to: 1) fix a typo in pom.xml 2) rollback to tomee and openejb 8.0.0-snapshot because that facilitates local debug and testing while trying to fix tests. 3) Removed from ./runtest shellscript the implicit -U flag for mvn. This was

Re: Examples Missing README Files

Thank you Bogdan, I reviewed +1 TOMEE-2372, can some of the committers please move forward this PR and it's corresponding JIRA. > Can I pick https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2393 ? Sure, go ahead. If you don't have JIRA permission to update the assignee, can som of the JIRA admins

Re: MicroProfile Integration in Plus and Plume

Hey Roberto, progress so far... the JAX-RS issue you referenced a few messages ago was solved with my filter enhancement. But actually found it was having the reverse affect for some requests (as in it was passing them down the chain when they were valid CXF requests - this was just about

Re: How can I help?

Thank you Salomon, +1, I reviewed the PR. Can some of the committers please move forward this PR and corresponding JIRA ticket. El vie., 8 feb. 2019 a las 15:48, Salomon () escribió: > Hi guys, > I just added PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/391 for >

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

One thing I saw happening too, is when I add the annotation below it doesn't get added to openapi. @RequestBody(content = @Content(schema = @Schema(implementation = Sms.class))) Is that because it is under development? On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:38 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Yes Ivan,

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Yes Ivan, array mapping is in progress. In the meantime you can define your schema to ensure you control it and the implicit representation does not depends on the way the impl parses it - which can not match your underlying mapper. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Hi Ivan, no the mapping can need some polishing to become mainstream (cause it is not openapi role to reimplement all mappers logic) but the annotation mapping is done. This one can depend the companions this annotation has, some will imply it gets ignored but AFAIK TCK test that and we pass them.

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

No I didn't, I will have a look. thanks On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Did you test on the snapshot? we got some enhancements about it. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

"In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Hey guys, I think there is an issue with parameters as the "in" property is required by the spec and is not showing up. This affects swagger-ui as it doesn't replace uf by the actual value. Anyone aware of this issue? { "openapi": "3.0.1", "paths": { "/test/{uf}": { "get": {

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Hi Ivan, Did you test on the snapshot? we got some enhancements about it. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: @OpenAPIDefinition not working

It didn't seem to work for me adding the property to system.properties. Any ideas what I am doing wrong? On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:21 AM Roberto Cortez wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Yes Romain is right, you should set openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application = > false and it should work. We had to set that for

Re: "In" parameter not being populated OpenAPI

Looks like it is fixed in the master, but when I get the lib and add to tomee it shows some bad behavior with the schemas. [image: image.png] On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > No I didn't, I will have a look. thanks > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM Romain