Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Hello: Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 plus preview binaries are successful, both in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or OpenEJB packages). Now our pressure is people asking when TomEE 1.6.0 will officially be accessible from the TomEE download page. Thanks, Alex. On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.comwrote: Jean-Louis: I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our QA development teams to test ASAP and report any issue. I'll keep you updated Thanks, Alex On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote: Hey guys, Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please, whatever it is (work or not). All information are available on the other thread. JLouis 2013/11/8 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb bigger due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make the shaded OpenJPA jar. Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to fail, so determination is required. Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get non-bloated zips up. -David On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom. See OPENJPA-2335 I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn. It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might have been a good reason for those changes. I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday. I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and OpenJPA immediately after that. I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch. Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and get some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build. Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that really only starts once we have a build to try. -David -- Jean-Louis
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
FYI (unrelated but still). Currently running the 'real' openjpa-2.3.0 release tasks Wish me luck... LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com To: dev@tomee.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 20:31 Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 Hello: Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 plus preview binaries are successful, both in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or OpenEJB packages). Now our pressure is people asking when TomEE 1.6.0 will officially be accessible from the TomEE download page. Thanks, Alex. On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.comwrote: Jean-Louis: I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our QA development teams to test ASAP and report any issue. I'll keep you updated Thanks, Alex On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote: Hey guys, Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please, whatever it is (work or not). All information are available on the other thread. JLouis 2013/11/8 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb bigger due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make the shaded OpenJPA jar. Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to fail, so determination is required. Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get non-bloated zips up. -David On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom. See OPENJPA-2335 I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn. It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might have been a good reason for those changes. I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday. I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and OpenJPA immediately after that. I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch. Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and get some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build. Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that really only starts once we have a build to try. -David -- Jean-Louis
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Good luck Mark! Thks if not obvious! Le 11 nov. 2013 20:50, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit : FYI (unrelated but still). Currently running the 'real' openjpa-2.3.0 release tasks Wish me luck... LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com To: dev@tomee.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 20:31 Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 Hello: Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 plus preview binaries are successful, both in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or OpenEJB packages). Now our pressure is people asking when TomEE 1.6.0 will officially be accessible from the TomEE download page. Thanks, Alex. On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.comwrote: Jean-Louis: I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our QA development teams to test ASAP and report any issue. I'll keep you updated Thanks, Alex On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote: Hey guys, Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please, whatever it is (work or not). All information are available on the other thread. JLouis 2013/11/8 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb bigger due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make the shaded OpenJPA jar. Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to fail, so determination is required. Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get non-bloated zips up. -David On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom. See OPENJPA-2335 I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn. It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might have been a good reason for those changes. I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday. I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and OpenJPA immediately after that. I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch. Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and get some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build. Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that really only starts once we have a build to try. -David -- Jean-Louis
Re: [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-108)
Had 12 TCK failures in this build I think due to my OpenJPA build. Mark is now publishing OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries to Nexus for an vote. I'll try rerolling with that version. If that works and TCK is clear, I'll put the vote. -David On Nov 9, 2013, at 6:38 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: The release tools need work, but this build is good and running the TCK now. Maven Repository: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-108/ Staged Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-108/tomee-1.6.0/ Source Branch: - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.6.0/ The Legal tool I wrote appears to not be working, so we'll have to do this on manually on that. I did check and there appeared to be no significant binary changes between 1.5.2 and 1.6.0. Give these binaries a swift kicking, so when we vote we know things are good. The goal is to close the vote on the 72 hours mark once it starts. That will hopefully be very soon. -David
[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ Tag: - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing to make up for their lost time. :) -David
[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go. Maven Repo: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ Binaries: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ Tag: - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing to make up for their lost time. :) -David
