Fwd: svn commit: r1612434 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x: container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/config/ maven/ maven/tomee-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/maven

Sorry but -1000 Best way to leak processes and kill a CI machine (we did it) It is good to hang in this case since it shows explicitely the issue if there is one -- Message transféré -- De : Date : 22 juil. 2014 00:45 Objet : svn commit: r1612434 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee

tomee trunk & cxf

Hi FYI I almost have a cxf 3 integration on trunk but need to create few geronimo spec jars, start our javaee-api 7 jar and cleanup some dependencies to be able to push it (but openejb-cxf-rs and openejb-cxf builds with tests all green). Will wait few days to see if we can get a green build befor

Fwd: svn commit: r1612398 - in /tomee/tomee/trunk: ./ maven/tomee-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/maven/plugin/AbstractTomEEMojo.java tomee/tomee-util/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/util

if ("-1".equals(tomeeVersion)) { final String version = OpenEjbVersion.get().getVersion(); -tomeeVersion = (Integer.parseInt(Character.toString(version.charAt(0))) - 3) + version.substring(1, version.length()); +tomeeVersion = "1" + version.substring(1,

Fwd: svn commit: r1612383 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x: maven/tomee-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/maven/plugin/AbstractTomEEMojo.java tomee/tomee-util/src/main/java/org/apach

then we should make keystore configurable Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: 2014-07-21 20:58 GMT+02:00 Subje

Re: tomcat 8.0.x in TomEE

Awesome! Niki Dokovski | @nickytd On 21.07.2014, at 20:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi > > yes, > > basically when all is green and 1.7 released it would be one of the first > tasks to do > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > Lin

Re: tomcat 8.0.x in TomEE

Hi yes, basically when all is green and 1.7 released it would be one of the first tasks to do Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-07-21 19:25 GMT+02:00 Nik

Re: TomEE 2.0.0

Thanks guy. :) -- Daniel Cunha (soro) Sent from my cell phone. Em 21/07/2014 14:00, "Romain Manni-Bucau" escreveu: > yes basically all is done in 1.7 and is relevant will be (is) in 2.x. The > opposite is already not true. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannib

tomcat 8.0.x in TomEE

Hi are there any plans of getting Tomcat 8 in the trunk branch of TomEE ? Current Tomcat 8 is still considered to be a beta but it gets more and more stable with each release. Best Regards Niki Dokovski | @nickytd

Re: TomEE 2.0.0

yes basically all is done in 1.7 and is relevant will be (is) in 2.x. The opposite is already not true. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-07-21 18:30 GMT+0

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1612260 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x/container/openejb-core/src: main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/stateless/ main/java/org/apache/openejb/util/ test/java/org/apache/op

:) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-07-21 18:51 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht : > Sure, I didn't just choose to add a lock for no reason. I removed the lock >

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1612260 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x/container/openejb-core/src: main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/stateless/ main/java/org/apache/openejb/util/ test/java/org/apache/op

Sure, I didn't just choose to add a lock for no reason. I removed the lock now and replaced the hashmap with a concurrent one, so it'll bite us if it doesn't like it ;) Andy. On 21/07/2014 15:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: previous lock? well this part shouldn't lock at all IMO Romain Mann

Re: TomEE 2.0.0

Hi Daniel, Sort of. Right now we are working towards a green build on the buildbot - And it has made sense to merge what we can so far. This is no guarantee for the future though. Trunk = TomEE 2.0.x and OpenEJB 5.0.x Once 1.7.x is released then 2.0.x will break away, far to far to be mergea

TomEE 2.0.0

Hello guys, trunk == 2.0.0? All update on 1.7.x merged to 2.0.0? -- Daniel Cunha (soro) Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1612260 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x/container/openejb-core/src: main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/stateless/ main/java/org/apache/openejb/util/ test/java/org/apache/op

previous lock? well this part shouldn't lock at all IMO Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-07-21 15:50 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht : > The previous lock was

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1612260 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x/container/openejb-core/src: main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/stateless/ main/java/org/apache/openejb/util/ test/java/org/apache/op

The previous lock was inconsistent, half internal and half external - So rather than remove the lock/synchronization entirely without knowing the consequences it was better to ensure the lock was consistent. Andy. On 21/07/2014 15:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi Andy Why is this lock needed

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

good catch! Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-07-21 15:13 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht : > StatelessInstanceManagerPoolingTest - I have it, and how obvious th

Fwd: svn commit: r1612260 - in /tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x/container/openejb-core/src: main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/stateless/ main/java/org/apache/openejb/util/ test/java/org/apache/openej

Hi Andy Why is this lock needed? this should be fine since updates are only during deployment. If not I'm tempted to fix it instead of adding a lock Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://gi

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

StatelessInstanceManagerPoolingTest - I have it, and how obvious these things are when you find them! :-D javax.ejb.ConcurrentAccessTimeoutException in the threads due to 100ms timeout - It's not checked, and so explode is/was not always called. Andy. On 21/07/2014 13:22, Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

- -- Andy Gumbrecht http://www.tomitribe.com agumbre...@tomitribe.com https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/failling-deltaspike-fullstack-tp46705

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

hehe, now I think to it you are surely right ;) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-07-21 13:19 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro : > Which channel? That was ma

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

Which channel? That was maybe the reason :p -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > well the point is we shouldn't end the method without ensuring all thread > are done. join is brutal but th

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

well the point is we shouldn't end the method without ensuring all thread are done. join is brutal but the most sure way to do so. Main issue on this test is buildbot since locally it fails very very rarely (got it once watching tv on the computer during the build ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

+1 Side note: I have been looking at the 'sometimes' failing StatelessInstanceManagerPoolingTest. The issue is not the Thread.join, I tried the same fix but does not work - If we join on each thread then we get a better chance, but only due to forcing threads to run sequentially and timing.

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

1.7 is affected as well, we just have luck sometimes since this code is the same. (depend test ordering for some of them but code was clearly wrong) I mainly focused on trunk since it showed some bugs of the 1.7 we can't see while we don't run tests against java 7. All are fixed excepted this one

Re: failling deltaspike-fullstack

Looks like we are having issues with examples and I was wondering why suddenly. Regarding Apache DS fullstack example, I can give that a try if Andy does not have time. Well, while trunk is important, I think we must focus on the branch until it gets released. Jean-Louis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro h

Re: TomEE 1.7.0 blockers

Cool thx Mark -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > tomee-1.7.x branch builds fine. > Sample app works fine. > Will test with a few production apps today. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > On Sunda