No 1.5.2 quickly and preparing 1.6.0 for the upcoming weeks (let's say in
February or so)
2013/1/21 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
guys, does it mean we release both 1.5.2 and 1.6.0 at the same time?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
Yep, +1, go ahead
(+ TCK i guess)
Jean-Louis
2013/2/13 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Hi guys,
seems we all agreed on the fact trunk is the future 1.6.0 and the 1.5.2
will be a branch from 1.5.1 tag
so can we switch versions on trunk + jira?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter:
Do you mean fork=branch ?
2013/3/5 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
We waited a lot for the 1.6.0 release
The main issue is xbean (Mark will run OWB release soon, David can release
sxc).
Any objection if we fork it?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau
+1
Jean Louis
Le 18 mars 2013 15:34, AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com a écrit :
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-javaee-api-6-0-5-tp4661574p4661597.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
Jean-Louis
2013/3/24 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
+-0
tomee seems to have gotten some fixes but arquillian got some regressions
(-1 for ports etc...)
basically for prod it works and for test you can still use the old version
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau
I'm generally in favor of such a cleaning to avoid tons of unused code to
maintain.
Svn is there to help us restore in case we need it.
Thanks for doing that
2013/3/28 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org
Dear commiters,
I was checking the stateless code a bit and I couldn't help to do some
Hi Alex,
The vote should be closed in my opinion.
David is the one who opened it so he's the one to count and publish
officially the result.
Then, he just have to promote binaries on nexus and perform some minors
official stuff.
Finally, it's just a matter of some hours to sync everything.
Hey hey we are actually together in Paris. I can promote binaries if needed
by Monday if David is busy.
Thanks Mark for voting.
Le 30 mars 2013 18:23, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Late +1 from here.
I think David is currently on the road between a few conferences.
Maybe Romain
What's the question exactly?
Woodstox is for parsing XML.
As per some CXF users list exchanges, it looks like Woodstox is the more
secure. Is that your concern?
Can we get rid of the one we are currently using?
What the impacts/benefits?
2013/4/2 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Hi,
Right!
David did not promoted the binaries as far as I can see on Nexus.
@David, any reason?
2013/4/3 Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.com
still no 1.5.2 official release ?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:14 PM, AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
wrote:
Late I know. But +1 from me.
Was
/tomee/tomee-1.5.2/
Should hit the mirrors soon.
-David
On Mar 31, 2013, at 7:18 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vote passes with 8 +1s and 1 +0.
+1s:
Alan Cabrera
Daniel Haischt
David Blevins
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jeff Genender
Thiago
-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok, I will take the dowload page into account.
I will also update Jiras (see David's comments before)
Finally, I gonna try to prepare a blog post for the annoucement.
Expected by the end of the day.
Jean-Louis
2013/4/8 dsh daniel.hais
Hi,
Just added missing stuff as required by
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
I also managed to refactor a bit the website in order to make it
more maintainable.
Hope I did not break anything. In case, please ping.
There is still work to do, but ...
--
Jean-Louis
.
-David
On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Just added missing stuff as required by
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
I also managed to refactor a bit the website in order to make it
more maintainable.
Hope I did not break anything
Looks good to me. Thanks.
Just one word missing maybe
we're doing everything we can do *TO *deliver you more TomEE
2013/4/23 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Crafted up this post for announcing the 1.5.2 release:
-
Bonjour Eric et bienvenue ;-)
All contribution even if no internal code is always welcome.
I would say that it's really appreciated at the moment cause we need it.
It's also a good to get into the project and maybe also push some patches.
Anyway, I have to check how to manage properly
Hey guys,
did someone already committed David's patch?
If not, I can do that.
Thanks David anyway.
Jean-Louis
2013/4/3 David Salter davidmsal...@me.com
I've attacked a patch to JIRA OPENEJB-1306 Validation: EJB's cannot be
declared as final -
Same here, someone already committed?
JLouis
2013/5/10 David Salter davidmsal...@me.com
Hi,
I've just submitted a patch to JIRA for OPENEJB-1294 that validates
classes with the @StatefulTimeout annotation on them.
The validation issues a warning if a non @Stateless bean (@Stateful,
Hi all,
Out of curiosity, who plans to go to JAX London this year (28th - 30th
October, 2013)?
Would be great to try to get together in London.
--
Jean-Louis
and
attending a conference for the day after?
My current thinking is... no effing way... but if anyone else is doing the
http://dublinmarathon.ie/ we could have a get together at the finish line!
On 30 July 2013 13:48, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Out of curiosity
Thanks Andy. Maybe we should forward to infra, dunno if others projects
already faced that.
JLouis
2013/9/24 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
Just deleted the first ever spam I have seen on JIRA! Looks like we're in
for
a spate of it :-(
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
Welcome Timitribe and well done David.
JLouis
2013/9/25 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl
Hi Dave and all,
As you may have noticed, I've been quiet for so long that I almost
lost track of the project. I however noticed that you were too much
silent to the extend that I thought you resigned.
Hey guys,
Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please,
whatever it is (work or not).
All information are available on the other thread.
JLouis
2013/11/8 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due
It does work for me. Only compiled on my Mac.
+1
JLouis
2013/11/12 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
OK, I have a single test failing:
testWithTransaction(org.superbiz.injection.tx.MoviesTest) Time elapsed:
0.285 sec ERROR!
javax.ejb.EJBException: The bean encountered a
Here is my +1
Only ran a full build locally.
JLouis
2013/11/12 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green.
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for the feedback
Would you give it a try with the other set of binaries and let us know?
The vote is currently opened so feel free to vote as well.
Thanks,
JLouis
2013/11/13 Bjorn Danielsson bjorn-apa...@lists.cuspycode.com
For whatever it's worth, my application works fine
David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE.
As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday.
If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday morning.
JLouis
2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
+1
updated my test suite - works fine
Of course.
AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday
or so.
JLouis
2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
@jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass
Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com a écrit
:
David has been out
Thanks David, here is my +1
JLouis
2013/11/17 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Ok, TCK clean so far.
Maven Repo:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/
Binaries:
- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/
Tag:
-
Hi,
there is a git mirror available, but read only AFAIR. For the moment, the
only valid referential for TomEE is svn.apache.org
JLouis
2013/11/20 Abhijit Sarkar social...@outlook.com
Sorry if this's been asked before, has moving the code to GitHub been
considered?
--Abhijit
--
So much feedback. That's awesome.
vote is going to close. David is currently sleeping, but he should do that
after i guess.
JLouis
2013/11/20 Bjorn Danielsson bjorn-apa...@lists.cuspycode.com
+1
Switched from EclipseLink to OpenJPA in my app and did a quick test.
Fixed a bug in my own code
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for joining and giving such a great feedback.
JLouis
2013/11/20 Ivan St. Ivanov ivan.st.iva...@gmail.com
Hello Tomee contributors,
I would like to say *Hi *to all of you. I hope that we will make Tomee a
great server!
Regards,
Ivan
--
Jean-Louis
Guys,
I plan to move the trunk to 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT.
The objective is to deliver a 1.6.0 maintenance release by the end of this
year.
In that release, there are small fixes:
- security issue fixed by Andy
- Rest undeploy/deploy issue
To name a few important ones.
I would like also to include the
Yet another big release :)
2013/11/24 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Closed the 1.6.0 version number in jira.
Here's a preview of our JIRA-generated Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320version=12324263
Some cleanup necessary,
Everyone,
The Apache TomEE PMC is pleased to announce Mark Struberg has accepted our
invitation to become a committer on the project.
Join me to welcome Mark!
Congrats and Thanks Mark.
--
Jean-Louis
Hi Thiago,
I committed 2 possible related changes.
First ...
svn ci -m Add a salt when initializing the Random
src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/client/RandomConnectionStrategy.java
svn ci Envoi
src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/client/RandomConnectionStrategy.java
Transmission des données .-m
://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/12/3 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Did not get time to dig into, was just my first feeling. Could you
elaborate a bit more?
Not sure I understood the extension issue?
JLouis
2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
The 3rd
Small update: finally got an answer on Tomcat mailling list. Tomcat 7.0.48
should be opened next week.
Jean-Louis
2013/11/25 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com
+1 Works for me
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
Guys,
Remember Romain doing some changes in the client part in order to make the
serialization pluggeable.
He broke somehow the compatibility and Andy did some fixes by introducing
the property *openejb.client.protocol.version* (
http://tomee.apache.org/properties-listing.html) .
It looks like
rmannibu...@gmail.com
Hi
Was tested (and is used) by at least 2 users + we have a test for it
(itests - LegacyTest iirc)so would need more details
Le 9 déc. 2013 13:17, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com a écrit :
Guys,
Remember Romain doing some changes in the client part in order
The TomEE Maven plugin is still moving forward with more new features.
Enhanced lightweight http serveur to support servlet deployments. Useful
for testing.
2013/12/10 Bjorn Danielsson bjorn-apa...@lists.cuspycode.com
User experience of out-of-the-box performance is better in general.
For
...but not an
elegant solution
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/12/18 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Thanks a lot Andy for summarizing the whole story
Thx Fernando. Committed for you.
Up on the staging website
http://tomee.staging.apache.org/installation-drop-in-war.html
Should hit the final repo soon.
Thanks again.
Jean-Louis
2014/1/5 Fernando Scherrer (fernando.scher...@gmail.com)
anonym...@apache.org
Clone URL (Committers only):
Hi Ivan,
Apologize for the late answer.
First of, happy new year.
- any committers can assign the Jira to you. But I need your Jira ID to
find you and add you as a contributor.
- you can just create a patch file for the changes and attach it to the
Jira.
Someone can review it and commit it for
how I can create the patch file for you
to review. Otherwise, here is my commit in github:
https://github.com/ivannov/tomee/commit/f0c0b486a0254b7b01b0bb6b46bb39f87d126efc
.
Cheers,
Ivan
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Apologize
request: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2
I would appreciate if you tell me how to create the patch myself :)
Thanks,
Ivan
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ivan,
The JIRA is affected to you now and I added you as a contributor
No no no, we must release the 1.6.1.
I've been out so to be honest, I haven't got time to follow the activity
for a week or so.
Is there something we are waiting for?
Otherwise, I should be able to give it a try.
So definitely +1
JLouis
2014/1/19 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Hi
He he thanks then.
Le 8 févr. 2014 08:11, agumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com a écrit :
I kind of guessed, but thought it would be rude not to answer. I happened
to
have it local so just updated and built it. No problems.
--
View this message in context:
Hello guys,
There is a security issue (DoS) on Tomcat 7/8 (all versions included).
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/201402.mbox/%3c52f373fc.9030...@apache.org%3E
I will move the trunk to the latest 7.0.51 that fixes the issue.
But I was rendering if there is any request or
With even it's even simpler I guess.
JLouis
2014-02-17 14:33 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Andy
please revert it since it was the first version of the code we had in
tomee jaxrs integration and needed to be refactored to match real
needs. If your issue is with
+1 no worries, we all do that.
But we should avoid ;-)
We also don't always write document, but we should ;-)
We don't always write tests, but we should ;-)
All the same because, we start we something and finally go into other
things, because no time, because something else is more funny.
+1, go ahead with a security page.
2014-02-18 1:26 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
we are all up to date normally
Le mardi 18 février 2014, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit
:
Hey All,
I've been chatting with security@ about what our requirements are
+1 looks good.
Just regarding the latest digit, was wondering is we could use instead:
su1, security update 1
sec01, security 01
The latest one is the more commonly used.
JLouis
2014-02-19 18:08 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com:
So as I mentioned in the security reporting
Agree with the possible more work, but it should be hopefully for us, isn't
it?
I mean, the main goal is to have limited changes so that customers/users
are confident in upgrading.
So, if more work for us, but less for users, the target is achieved IMHO.
JLouis
2014-02-19 21:54 GMT+01:00
Did not got it locally yesterday.
Lemme give it a try again.
Jean-Louis
2014-02-20 2:27 GMT+01:00 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org:
Hi Jean-Louis,
It looks like the BeforeAppInfoBuilderEvent class breaks the build.
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.543
Should be better now.
JLouis
2014-02-20 8:22 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Did not got it locally yesterday.
Lemme give it a try again.
Jean-Louis
2014-02-20 2:27 GMT+01:00 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org:
Hi Jean-Louis,
It looks like
Hi devs,
As we agreed on the process to set up on top of the security maintenance
and vulnerability management, let's give it a try.
Created a branch and merge all tomcat 7.0.52 related changed.
Gonna push a first set of snapshot binaries
--
Jean-Louis
+1
Le 29 mars 2014 06:01, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org a écrit :
+1
On Mar 29, 2014 12:59 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Very valid. In fact you reminded me of another topic of potentially
moving the examples out to their own repo.
Posted on that in another
Hi devs,
Everything looks good with Tomcat 7.0.52 which fixes the CVE raised on
Tomcat (related to Commons file upload).
Do we stick with that version or do we do the Tomcat 7.0.53 upgrade that
fixes some regressions introduced in Tomcat 7.0.52?
If yes, that should not be a big deal, otherwise
Hi devs,
As discussed heavily, the security maintenance release to fix the Tomcat
CVE 2014-50.
According to our discussions and decisions summarized here
https://tomee.apache.org/security/index.html
we will start the release process.
Special thanks to Jon who has worked heavily to prepare
Hi devs,
now that the security maintenance release 1.6.0.1 is ongoing, time to look
in the upcoming months. Here are some thoughts on a possible roadmap.
- Apache TomEE 1.6.0.1 (now)
Security maintenance release 1.6.0.1 -- Cf. previous mails on the dev@list.
- Apache TomEE 1.7.0 (next week,
?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-04-07 21:59 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Hi devs,
now that the security maintenance release
Forgot a big big thank you to Romain as usual. He's always so active and
efficient that we sometimes forget to highlight his high valuable
contribution.
Thanks Romain.
2014-04-07 21:50 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Hi devs,
As discussed heavily, the security maintenance
://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-04-07 22:42 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
1.6.1: totally opened question, much more for users in order to have a
better compatibility insurance ;-) Not sure
Hi devs,
Seen some messages on IRC from Andy. Looks like you are having troubles
creating and sending a new set of binaries.
Giving a try now. The build is starting and deploying to a new staging 1007.
As usual, I cleaned up all my Maven repo, so that I'm sure. The counter
part is that it takes
not sure
2014-04-11 11:03 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com:
Yes, I think it is a signing issue and the repo rejecting. Not sure how
the first build went through if that's the issue though?
--
--
Andy Gumbrecht
http://www.tomitribe.com | agumbre...@tomitribe.com
--
Thanks Daniel for this interesting and accurate answer.
2014-04-11 21:09 GMT+02:00 dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'd suppose that the OpenSSL version used by APR depends on the OpenSSL
version provided by the underlying OS too. Additionally that yet doesn't
say anything about the
-1
I'm sorry Andy, not your fault at all. We probably missed them last time,
but we can't leave that again.
I've seen some ASF headers missing
container/openejb-concurrency-utilities-ee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/concurrencyutilities/ee/factory/ManagedThreadFactoryImplFactory.java
heartbleed and even if it
affects only apr users - which are numerous actually).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-04-14 7:48 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis
ant -f rat.xml
Le 14 avr. 2014 10:38, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com a écrit :
What was the command you used to locate the missing headers?
Andy.
On 14/04/2014 07:48, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
-1
I'm sorry Andy, not your fault at all. We probably missed them last time,
but we
of the box, deploying the same EJB JAR
into 2 different webapps must work.
If users still want to bind legacy names, never mind they can just activate
the property in the system.properties file.
WDYT?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http
+1, supporting both is fine
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
Andy added a sample for datasource versioning sample. I helped a bit
to make
.
But definitely, users can still activate the binding with a simple property.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
No
legacy stuff is not specified at all
;-)
--
Andy Gumbrecht http://www.tomitribe.com
TomEE treibt Tomitribe!
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
On April 18, 2014 9:37:36 AM CEST, Jean-Louis Monteiro
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com wrote:
Hi,
Just to be clear.
The legacy binding does not affect neither TCK
add .diff instead of .patch should be enough
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
patch -p0 6.patch
Oops that's a git patch and then you need a good
I mean
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/6.diff
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com wrote:
add .diff instead of .patch should be enough
The consensus is there.
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-1182
Thanks everyone.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tommy Tynjä to...@diabol.se wrote:
Sounds like a good
Indeed
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:35 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote:
Another perspective on this matter:
Returning to Heartbleed, one thing conspicuously missing from the
downshouting
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:50 AM, helio frota 00h...@gmail.com wrote:
I think 3.0.5 should by now be the entry level version, especially due to
this - http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-0253
+1
Hello guys,
Please check this page
http://cxf.apache.org/security-advisories.html
The 4 latest ones have been discovered recently, so we should plan a
1.6.0.2 soon if we are also using CXF vulnerable binaries, isn't it?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http
+1 for 1.7.0 if everything is ready for Java 8
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
seems consistent
side note: we should release 1.7.0 too - it is due for weeks
to achieve?
Regards
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:37 PM, LEBOULANGER Aurélien
aurelien.leboulan...@3ds.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to get all libraries available at runtime (in tomEE/lib)
with only one declaration
?
openejb.check.classloader=true
openejb.check.classloader.verbose=true
Can be regular system properties or added to the system.properties file.
Jean-Louis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:54 AM, aurelien.leboulanger
aurelien.leboulan
No way, we support java 6 runtime and we have to till we want to get
certified.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
no doubt at all actually. JVM 8
Thanks
Le 12 mai 2014 05:29, agumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.com a écrit :
Thanks Daniel,
Was kind of leaning on the 'Commit-Then-Review, Consensus Gauging through
Silence' to get this out, but now we're happy!
That brings us to:
+1's
Jean-Louis Monteiro (PMC)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Andy
Thanks Andy.
Build and tck all green.
All other legal stuff as well.
So here is my +1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:08 AM, helio frota 00h...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
---
http
It should not be synchronized again.
Apache mirror and all stuff takes a bit of time to get synchronized.
Apologize for that.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Chuck Davis cjgun...@gmail.com wrote:
Click
Thanks so much Andy
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Andy Gumbrecht agumbre...@tomitribe.comwrote:
Apache TomEE 1.6.0.2 Released!
Apache TomEE is happy to announce the security related release of Apache
Sorry, I fixed that.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.orgwrote:
Oh... Java 7 feature...
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/RuntimeException.html
Yes, it's for backward compatibility ;-)
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.orgwrote:
Hey, no problem!
One other thing. It looks like we are using our own deprecated code
Done
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.orgwrote:
So...
@SuppressWarnings( deprecation )
on it. :O)
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
jlmonte
lol
probably cause I'm receiving commit mails from the 9th
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.orgwrote:
Oh... I guess the mail server is still trying to catch up. :)
[]s
+1 works fine for me.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
a quick message to try to normalize a bit commit messages (I blame
nobody that's for me
be good to clean it up and get everyone to take a fresh look.
-David
On May 16, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com wrote:
+1 works fine for me.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri
.
Would be great to right a doc page with the different loading choice
tomcat-juli and this latest one on our website, so that users can know
depending on the version they are using.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11
Parabéns
Joao Luis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:56 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
How did the talk go, Daniel?
Congratulations, btw
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http
No issue, just something to do ;-)
Always great to write somewhere so that we don't forget
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
we handle these one so
that's what Andy did with the latest javaee-api jar I think.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
btw, we should think about removing the el-api from our javaee-api
el-api has been removed already, but don't know if it has been in the good
one.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
We have a Tomcat flavor of the javaee-api jar
Thanks Chamil, the overall size as well, less than 50 MB for the web
profile.
The startup time, I mean to be ready to work with all specifications of the
web profile.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Chamil
1 - 100 of 1110 matches
Mail list logo