On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 11:28 +0800, Yan Wu wrote:
But this machine I get in hand isn't a standard Alpha platform. There
are some different assembly instructions from the standard EV6. To my
surprise, OOo could run on such an experimental machine.
Sounds really interesting :-). You could still
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:08 +0800, Yan Wu wrote:
Hi,
I got a error when building testtools on Alpha EV6 platform as following:
/bin/bash: line 1: 15238 Segmentation error
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:}/home/office/ooo_OOO330_m12_src/solver/330/unxlngaxp.pro/lib
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 16:24 +0800, Yan Wu wrote:
/bin/bash: line 1: 26597 Bus error
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:}/home/cs2c/wuyan/ooo_OOO330_m12_src/solver/330/unxlngmips.pro/lib
/home/cs2c/wuyan/ooo_OOO330_m12_src/solver/330/unxlngmips.pro/bin/uno
-ro uno_services.rdb
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 11:13 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 28/06/2010 23:16, Ben Engbers wrote:
I have a laptop running Fedora 12 and tred to build the latest version
of OpenOffice.
...
Can anyody help me in building OpenOffice 3.2.1?
Thanks,
Ben
configure: error: Library
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 19:09 +0900, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi
At module reportbuilder, massively parallel build breaks for OOO320_m1, m2,
DEV300_m61
I cannot say something definitely but I (sometimes) encountered and FBSD's
QATindy
has also reproduced my breakage.
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 16:09 +0530, abeesh k k kappiri wrote:
hai all
when building OOO310_m19 from tcsh under fedora 8 pyhon version 2.5
dmake fails as showing the following messages
/var/oo_new/OOO310_m19/solver/310/unxlngi6.pro/lib/python/site.py:150:
Warning: 'with' will become a
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 13:19 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:11:32PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
you'd have to convert that to
ant_minver=1.7.1
No, please not.
...
No need to force ant 1.7.1 on anyone (which might not even have 1.7.1 yet)
The current check
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:31 +0900, Takashi Ono wrote:
Hi all,
I think if there exist recent changes in files being deleted in a integration
of a cws,
they should be automatically warned to RE. Is it considered in the standard
of
procedures?
The background is i#105542. The file
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 20:15 +0200, Sophie wrote:
- Not enough bots or optimized builds bots to have more capacity for
building install sets.
This was particularly miserable coming up to the feature freeze. I think
there were 80+ hour waiting times on builds on the solitary windows
bot :-(
-
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 10:13 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 15:57 +0100, Rüdiger Timm wrote:
Your 'cws rebase -m whatever should have written a file named
REBASE.CONFIG_DONT_DELETE to that directory. Do you see such a file at
/home/kyoshida/ooo/koheidatapilot02 ?
No,
10 matches
Mail list logo
