and we're likely to break it for you, and we'll
> have to figure out why. It'll just be more painful for everyone to do new
> things in Perl.
>
> You can also convert Perl endpoints to Go yourself, as you need to modify
> them, if you like. Just be sure to coord
Hi Nir and all,
Do you know when will the full GO version of Traffic Ops be ready in the master
branch? The reason I raise this question is that we are starting to implement
this feature, and if some of the APIs involving this feature are still in Perl
and will not be ported to GO very soon,
irect location when there is no available cache in a DS.
—Eric
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:43 AM, John Shen (weifensh) <weife...@cisco.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We are planning to add a Last-resort routing feature to Traffic Control.
It will make
- such a
plugin would be statically compiled into the TR “jar"
[John] Yes, this is true.
—Eric
> On Jun 23, 2017, at 10:49 AM, John Shen (weifensh) <weife...@cisco.com>
wrote:
>
> Traffic Router currently support Coverage Zone File based ro
Traffic Router currently support Coverage Zone File based routing and
Geolocation based routing. We are planning to add another type of routing
selection logic. Since this part of code will not be put into open source code,
we are considering how to integrate the new routing selection code into
Thanks Jan!
Best regards,
John
On 14/04/2017, 10:25 PM, "Jan van Doorn" <j...@knutsel.com> wrote:
I don’t see an issue, provided you make it backwards compatible, and it
looks like you are.
Rgds,
JvD
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 12:04 AM, John She
Currently TO supports only one custom access log file by configuring the
"LogFormat" and "LogObject" parameters for "logs_xml.config". We have a
requirement to support multiple custom access log files. As ATS does support
this, we are planning to extend "LogFormat"&"LogObject" on TO, and add
hat might appear in one's CZF.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:12 AM, John Shen (weifensh)
> <weife...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > Thank you for the detail. I am wond
es to the log because it'll be identical in most CZF
hit cases.
Thanks,
Thanks,
Jeff
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:02 AM, John Shen (weifensh)
<weife...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I have just tried the getClosestCacheLocation() logic. It appears the CZF
> matched lat/lo
Hi Jeff,
I have just tried the getClosestCacheLocation() logic. It appears the CZF
matched lat/long does come from CZF, but the lat/long of the “closest” Cache
Groups is from the configuration by Ops. This means to calculate the distance
from the matched CG and “closest” CG, the source
10 matches
Mail list logo