I was considering adding a News page that would have a link in the top menu (HOME INFO DOCS ISSUES NEWS ...) when I was
release manager.
Other projects put the news on the main page: https://httpd.apache.org/
Regardless, I think we should move it to the our apache.org site instead of
GitHub.
+1
Lab Testing:
- Docker build - Could not figure out how to get all components to build at once
- build/build.sh on CentOS 6 - all components built successfully
- Upgraded Traffic Monitor (2.2.0.d7e588 -> 2.2.0.6ea850)
- Could pull up UI and it connects to all cache servers
- Upgraded
+1
On 03/01/2018 10:41 AM, Dave Neuman wrote:
Hey All,
After a great discussion amongst the Apache Traffic Control PPMC, reviewing
the graduation checklist[1], updating the podling status page[2], and
updating the project website to ensure the whimsy podling website checks
pass[3], I would
On 01/22/2018 10:01 AM, sebb wrote:
On 22 January 2018 at 14:48, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
The Apache Traffic Control team is proud to announce the release of Apache
Traffic Control 2.1.0 (incubating).
More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at:
The Apache Traffic Control team is proud to announce the release of Apache
Traffic Control 2.1.0 (incubating).
More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at:
http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/
The release artifacts can be downloaded here:
/95689e3c01a601a6c5ff8873785d8728c2eb2f95b040a9fbcb159d7f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
On 19 January 2018 at 13:47, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
Hello,
It would appear RC3 has passed the IPMC vote. I'll do the release today.
Regards,
Hank
On 2018-01-17 17:01, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 (bin
Hello,
It would appear RC3 has passed the IPMC vote. I'll do the release today.
Regards,
Hank
On 2018-01-17 17:01, Phil Sorber wrote:
> +1 (binding). After having fought with docker for a bit I was able to build
> packages. Sig and hashes check out as well. We should work
,
Hank Beatty hbea...@apache.org
On 01/02/2018 09:39 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 2.1.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
On 01/08/2018 03:25 AM, Henk P. Penning wrote:
Hi Dan,
regarding
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/trafficcontrol/2.0.0-incubating/
Please use extension .md5 instead of .md5sum ;
this is required :
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
://trafficcontrol.apache.org/downloads/index-new.html
I'm working on removing the 1.8.1 links now.
Thanks,
Hank
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Hank Beatty wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:17:59 +0100
From: Hank Beatty <hbea...@a
in:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/trafficcontrol/KEYS
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Hank Beatty hbea...@apache.org
Hello,
This vote has passed with +6. Putting together the IPMC email now.
Thanks everyone.
Hank
On 12/20/2017 05:14 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
+1
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC3
The vote i
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC3
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3
+1 PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Changes since 2.0.0:
On 12/06/2017 04:14 AM, Henk P. Penning wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, Hank Beatty wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:49:03 +0100
From: Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org>
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: dev@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic C
On 12/05/2017 06:31 PM, sebb wrote:
On 5 December 2017 at 16:49, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 2.1.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Inc
Yes, of course. How does Friday 11/17 or Monday 20/17 sound?
On 11/14/2017 04:09 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
Hey Hank,
It looks like you have the votes you need to pass, but can you leave it
open a little longer for those of us that haven't gotten a chance to test
yet?
Thanks,
Dave
On Tue, Nov 14,
Yes. Steve Malenfant signed it. Unfortunately, it looks like he is not in the "circle of trust" in the KEYS file. Does
that matter?
On 11/14/2017 02:47 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) wrote:
I’m +1 as well
Checked out:
- signatures/checksums (Hank is your key signed yet?)
- licenses
- build
10, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC1
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least 3 +1 PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package b
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC1
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3
+1 PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Changes since 2.0.0:
This vote has failed. There will be a new RC when the issues have been resolved.
Thanks,
Hank
On 10/23/2017 04:01 PM, Hank Beatty wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC1
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3
+1 PPMC votes are cast
end up in this
changelog? I know theres a bunch more that went into 2.1 that isn’t in this
list.
Should we make sure that every PR/Issue is assigned a milestone before its
merged?
On Oct 26, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Phil this is very nice.
Both of t
(efriedri) wrote:
Do PRs/issues that don’t have a milestone assigned still end up in this
changelog? I know theres a bunch more that went into 2.1 that isn’t in this
list.
Should we make sure that every PR/Issue is assigned a milestone before its
merged?
On Oct 26, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Hank Beatty
://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/tools/changelog.pl
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:52 AM Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote:
You guys mean like this?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/master/misc/changelog.pl
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:39 AM Hank Beatty <h
Release Notes associated with this release? 1,337 changes and
the link above will only display 250 of them.
Steve
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC1
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v2.1.0-RC1
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3
+1 PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Changes since 2.0.0:
Hello Everyone,
I have finished my first pass of the open bugs that could possibly apply
to 2.1. We have reduced the count from 110 to 80! There are some of
these that already have PRs open. I plan on starting to go through these
today. If anyone has time to test/review another's PR and merge
It looks like this one is ready to be merged. Can someone please take a
look at this PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/360?
Thanks,
Hank
Forwarded Message
Subject: [jira] [Created] (TC-187) Update delivery service makes SSL
keys invalid
Date:
There is a PR
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/294) open for
this one. Can someone review and merge and backport if acceptable?
Thanks,
Hank
Forwarded Message
Subject: [jira] [Created] (TC-157) Failed to restart tomcat in Traffic
Router when
Does anyone know if this has been fixed? If not, are we planning in
fixing it for 2.1?
Thanks,
Hank
Forwarded Message
Subject: [jira] [Created] (TC-151) Delivery Service XML IDs should be
limited to lower-case letters
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:10:41 + (UTC)
From:
Does anyone know if this has been fixed? If not, are we planning in
fixing it for 2.1?
Thanks,
Hank
Forwarded Message
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (TC-118) Traffic Ops should get it's name
from some confioguration when generating CrConfig
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:00:01
the TC database, and next to get in are
the tenancy based access control enforcement - for users as well as
delivery services.
We expect it to be fully in master within 2 weeks.
Thanks,
Nir
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
Good Morning,
I am
Hi Dave,
I would like to volunteer.
Thanks,
Hank
On 07/05/2017 03:38 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
Hey All,
Now that 2.0 has officially passed the project and IPMC vote (YAY!), it's
time to start thinking about 2.1. I don't think we have identified a
release manager for the 2.1 release yet, would
I'm unable to access these.
Traffic Ops: private filters
Traffic Ops API: private filters
Traffic Router: private filters
Traffic Monitor: private filters
Traffic Portal: private filters
Traffic Stats: don't have access
Traffic Analytics: private filters
Also, don't these become unusable once
I started a Traffic Control Client in python.
You can find it here:
https://github.com/hbeatty/traffic-control-python
Still needs a lot of work!
Thanks,
Hank
On 06/14/2017 11:35 AM, Scrimo, Robert (Contractor) wrote:
All,
I would like to add a Python Traffic Ops Client to the
.
thanks! Dan
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
postinstall might still be broken:
Password for database server admin:
Re-Enter Password for database server admin:
Download Maxmind Database? [yes]:
Download Maxmind Database?: yes
===/opt/traffic_o
postinstall might still be broken:
Password for database server admin:
Re-Enter Password for database server admin:
Download Maxmind Database? [yes]:
Download Maxmind Database?: yes
===/opt/traffic_ops/app/conf/cdn.conf===
Generate a new secret? [yes]:
Generate a new secret?: yes
Do we care if the documentation is up to date before we cut a release?
Especially since this requires postgresql 9.6 and that is not mentioned
on the install page.
http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/docs/2.0.x/admin/traffic_ops_install.html
On 06/05/2017 02:16 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
+1
On 05/18/2017 04:32 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
In
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
Dave
mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
that thread if you are not
-1 for a manual changelog - doing a compare between branches/commits in
github is relatively simple.
+1 for a scripted changelog -
https://github.com/skywinder/github-changelog-generator - There is even
a list of alternatives:
+1
On 05/17/2017 10:51 AM, Dave Neuman wrote:
While at ApaceCon, a few of us attended a talk about navigating the
incubator where we were informed that "full" Github is now available for
podlings. This gives us the ability to use github issues, to use github
wiki, to assign PRs, to add tags to
If you are looking for a load testing tool you might try http://locust.io
On 05/11/2017 11:22 AM, Burak Sarp wrote:
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; }
Hi all,
Hi Naama,
I like the idea of making Access Control hierarchical.
I came up with some questions I thought we might think about:
1. Do the tenants become the equivalent of the "groups" we are using today?
2. In your example, can there be children of 'Company C'?
3. Some of the APIs currently
+1
Looks like only licenses were changed.
On 02/17/2017 03:07 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC11). I apologize for the
confusion on RC10 -- we had a glitch in our tagging process. RC11 is
identical to RC10, but we decided to redo the process
+1
On 02/16/2017 01:50 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10
This corresponds to git:
Hash:
On 01/19/2017 02:22 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
It also appears the issue I brought up about Traffic Ops not working with
Riak 2.1.4 hasn't been addressed.
We agreed, I think on email but maybe on slack, that we would document the
Riak issue in release notes and fix it in the next release. Do you
On 01/19/2017 02:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
Thanks, Hank..I don't think the double-license or double-use
will have any impact, but thanks for pointing those out.I'll get
that fixed in master. Still -1?
-dan
That was just an FYI.
* traffic_ops/app/lib/Schema/Result/SteeringView.pm
* License is in twice
* use strict and use warnings is also in twice
It also appears the issue I brought up about Traffic Ops not working
with Riak 2.1.4 hasn't been addressed.
-1
On 01/13/2017 03:57 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
Hello All,
47 matches
Mail list logo